Lymphoma patients are at greater risk of severe consequences from COVID-19 infection, yet most reports of COVID-19-associated outcomes were published before the advent of COVID-19 vaccinations and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). In this retrospective study, we report the real-world outcomes of 68 lymphoma or CLL patients who developed COVID-19 infection during the omicron surge in the US. We found that 34% of patients were hospitalized as a result of COVID-19 infection. The death rate due to COVID-19 was 9% (6/68) in the overall population and 26% (6/23) in hospitalized patients. During the preintervention COVID-19 era, the mortality rate reported in cancer patients was 34%, which increased to 60.2% in hospitalized patients. Thus, the death rates in our study were much lower when compared to those in cancer patients earlier in the pandemic, and may be attributed to modern interventions. In our study, 60% (18/30) of patients with serology data available did not develop anti-COVID-19 spike protein antibodies following vaccination. Most patients (74%, 17/23) who were hospitalized due to COVID-19 infection did not receive COVID-19 mAb treatment. Our results pointed to the importance of humoral immunity and the protective effect of COVID-19 mAbs in improving outcomes in lymphoma patients.

Advancements in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) have illuminated the disease’s molecular diversity, leading to a wide variation in the outcomes observed in MCL. Current prognostic risk scores are continuously revised to incorporate new updates in the mechanistic or biologic understanding of MCL. Nevertheless, key high-risk features of MCL associated with rapid disease progression and poor survival, such as TP53 mutations, complex karyotypes, and blastoid or pleomorphic morphologies, remain absent from available prognostic tools. The greater accessibility of genomic technologies, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), has enabled clinicians to identify specific genetic alterations that serve as prognostic signals and disease monitoring parameters, cultivating accurate risk profiling that is illustrative of MCL heterogeneity. Through an increased understanding of distinct MCL behaviors, novel therapies that mechanistically target disease biology, including Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors, BCL-2 inhibitors, ROR1 inhibitors, and bispecific T-cell engagers, have broadened the treatment armamentarium for relapsed/refractory MCL cases. These interventions, in addition to chemoimmunotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation mainstays, confer the individualization of treatment and improved survival outcomes. Further exploration of the considerable biological heterogeneity of MCL can enhance knowledge, management, and the treatment of this rare lymphoma subtype.

Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common diagnosed aggressive B-cell lymphoma, with poor outcomes in those who experience relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease. Landmark clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for patients with R/R DLBCL, though further exploration of real-world outcomes (RWOs) and safety data is warranted. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to collect patient and disease characteristics from patients with R/R DLBCL receiving CAR T-cell therapy for third-line treatment or beyond at the John Theurer Cancer Center as the standard of care. Results: We report on 82 patients with R/R DLBCL that successfully completed an infusion of an anti-CD19 CAR T-cell product at our institution. Best overall and complete response rates were 74.4% (95% CI, 64.9 to 83.8) and 67.1% (95% CI, 56.9 to 77.2), respectively. From the time of CAR T-cell infusion, median PFS was 26.5 months (95% CI, 8.6 months could not be estimated) and OS was not reached. Subgroup analyses revealed no statistical differences in outcomes by use of bridging therapy, Karnofsky performance status, transformed DLBCL status, and the type of CAR T-cell product used for this study. CAR T-cell therapy was well tolerated, with 58 patients (70.7%) experiencing cytokine-release syndrome and 17 patients (20.7%) experiencing immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. Conclusions: These results of RWOs in third-line patients with R/R DLBCL receiving anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy are comparable or superior to prior clinical trials and studies of RWOs, validating the strong efficacy and manageable toxicities of CAR T-cell therapy.

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a malignancy of skin-homing T cells associated with increased risk of second malignancies. CAR-T lymphoma is a mature T-cell malignancy arising in cancer patients treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. Because of its frequent cutaneous involvement, CAR-T lymphoma can mimic CTCL, which in turn can resemble cutaneous sequelae of oncologic therapies. Careful evaluation of these entities in cancer patients is therefore essential, yet little guidance exists regarding optimal methods of screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Clinicians managing CTCL in cancer patients should consider how oncologic treatment toxicities may overlap with CTCL treatment toxicities or affect patients’ risk for other skin cancers. Where possible, immune-boosting or at least immune-preserving treatments are preferred, with immune checkpoint inhibition emerging as an important option in selected patients. Patients with a history of CAR-T therapy and new, persistent skin findings should undergo careful work-up with molecular screening for lymphoproliferative processes. Presence of a CAR in lesional tissue can be suggestive but is not diagnostic of a CAR-T-associated malignancy. Treatment for any patient with a cutaneous T-cell or CAR-T lymphoma and a second cancer should be an interdisciplinary effort tailored to the patient’s specific medical history and molecular profile. Further research is needed to establish better evidence-based guidelines for treatment of these patient populations.