Allison J. Ouimet

Dr. Allison J. Ouimet

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2008 in Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RCRoger Covin
Roger Covin
AOAllison J. Ouimet
Allison J. Ouimet
PSPamela M. Seeds
Pamela M. Seeds
DDDavid J.A. Dozois
David J.A. Dozois

1 August 2009 in Clinical Psychology Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AOAllison J. Ouimet
Allison J. Ouimet
BGBertram Gawronski
Bertram Gawronski
DDDavid J.A. Dozois
David J.A. Dozois

1 November 2020 in Neurobiology of Stress
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NLN.F. Narvaez Linares
N.F. Narvaez Linares
VCV. Charron
V. Charron
AOAllison J. Ouimet
Allison J. Ouimet
PLPatrick R. Labelle
Patrick R. Labelle
HPHélène Plamondon
Hélène Plamondon
Since its development in 1993, the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) has been used widely as a psychosocial stress paradigm to activate the sympathetic nervous system and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPAA) stress systems, stimulating physiological functions (e.g. heart rate) and cortisol secretion. Several methodological variations introduced over the years have led the scientific community to question replication between studies. In this systematic review, we used the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) to synthesize procedure-related data available about the TSST protocol to highlight commonalities and differences across studies. We noted significant discrepancies across studies in how researchers applied the TSST protocol. In particular, we highlight variations in testing procedures (e.g., number of judges, initial number in the arithmetic task, time of the collected saliva samples for cortisol) and discuss possible misinterpretation in comparing findings from studies failing to control for variables or using a modified version from the original protocol. Further, we recommend that researchers use a standardized background questionnaire when using the TSST to identify factors that may influence physiological measurements in tandem with a summary of this review as a protocol guide. More systematic implementation and detailed reporting of TSST methodology will promote study replication, optimize comparison of findings, and foster an informed understanding of factors affecting responses to social stressors in healthy people and those with pathological conditions.

1 January 2005 in Behavioral Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Genaro Alfonso Coria-AvilaGenaro Alfonso Coria-Avila
Genaro Alfonso Coria-Avila
AOAllison J. Ouimet
Allison J. Ouimet
PPPablo Pacheco
Pablo Pacheco
Jorge ManzoJorge Manzo
Jorge Manzo
JPJames G. Pfaus, PhD
James G. Pfaus, PhD
Paced copulation induces conditioned place preference in female rats. The authors examined whether associating almond-scented males with paced copulation induces conditioned partner preference. The paired group received 4 paced copulations with almond-scented males and 4 nonpaced copulations with unscented males sequentially at 4-day intervals. The unpaired group received the opposite order of association, whereas the randomly paired group received random associations. A 4th group received a single pairing. On the final test, females were placed into an open field with 2 males, 1 scented and 1 unscented. Females in the paired group solicited the scented male more frequently, and most chose the scented male for their 1st ejaculation. Thus, an odor paired with paced copulation elicits conditioned partner preference in female rats.

27 May 2014 in Journal of Gambling Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Gioia BottesiGioia Bottesi
Gioia Bottesi
MGMarta Ghisi
Marta Ghisi
AOAllison J. Ouimet
Allison J. Ouimet
MTMichael D. Tira
Michael D. Tira
ESEzio Sanavio
Ezio Sanavio

1 September 2006 in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAdam S. Radomsky
Adam S. Radomsky
AOAllison J. Ouimet
Allison J. Ouimet
AAAndrea R. Ashbaugh
Andrea R. Ashbaugh
SLStefanie L. Lavoie
Stefanie L. Lavoie
CPChris L. Parrish
Chris L. Parrish
KOKieron P. O'COnnor
Kieron P. O'COnnor
The Vancouver Obsessional‐Compulsive Inventory (VOCI) and the Symmetry Ordering and Arranging Questionnaire (SOAQ) are self‐report measures that assess a wide variety of symptoms and features of obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD) including checking, contamination, obsessions, hoarding, “just right”, indecisiveness, and symmetry, ordering and arranging obsessions and compulsions. The original English versions of the VOCI and SOAQ have been shown to demonstrate excellent psychometric properties. The present study examined the reliability and validity of French translations of these measures in a non‐clinical sample, and also involved the collection of supplementary psychometric information about the English versions of the scales from a new sample. Volunteer undergraduate students completed questionnaire packages including the VOCI and SOAQ, as well as measures of obsessive‐compulsive, phobic and depressive symptomatology in their native language of either French or English. Results indicate that the French versions of the VOCI and SOAQ demonstrate similar and excellent psychometric properties to the English versions and that these measures are highly valid and reliable assessment tools for use in clinical and research applications in both languages.