David Taylor

Dr. David Taylor


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

42Years (1985-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2012 in Journal of Medical Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DTDavid Taylor
David Taylor
RMRoger D. Moon
Roger D. Moon
DMDarrell R. Mark
Darrell R. Mark
Stable flies, Stomoxys calcitrans (L.), are among the most damaging arthropod pests of cattle worldwide. The last estimate of their economic impact o

1 November 2013 in Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJeffrey G. Scott
Jeffrey G. Scott
CLCheryl A. Leichter
Cheryl A. Leichter
FRFrank D. Rinkevihc
Frank D. Rinkevihc
SHSarah A. Harris
Sarah A. Harris
CSCathy Su
Cathy Su
LZLudek Zurek
Ludek Zurek

1 January 2021 in Journal of Integrated Pest Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KRK Rochon
K Rochon
Jerome A. HogsetteJerome A. Hogsette
Jerome A. Hogsette
Phillip KaufmanPhillip Kaufman
Phillip Kaufman
POP U Olafson
P U Olafson
SSS L Swiger
S L Swiger
DTDavid Taylor
David Taylor
Stable flies, Stomoxys calcitrans (L.) are global pests of livestock, companion animals, and humans. These flies inflict painful bites and cause significant economic losses to producers by reducing livestock production. In addition, they have been associated with the mechanical transmission of several pathogens causing disease in animals. Management of this species is difficult because: 1) their developmental habitats are often ephemeral accumulations of decomposing vegetation, 2) they can exploit cultural practices in many agricultural and urban environments, and 3) the adults are highly mobile. An integrated pest management (IPM) approach is required to effectively manage stable flies, including integration of cultural, mechanical, physical, biological, and chemical control options. The challenges of stable flies in different animal commodities are discussed, and current and novel technologies for control are presented. Lastly, need for additional research to improve stable fly management methods are discussed.

19 September 2018 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Junwei Jerry ZhuJunwei Jerry Zhu
Junwei Jerry Zhu
SCSteven C. Cermak
Steven C. Cermak
JKJim Kenar
Jim Kenar
GBGary Brewer
Gary Brewer
KHKenneth F. Haynes
Kenneth F. Haynes
DTDavid Taylor
David Taylor
Hematophagous arthropods are capable of transmitting human and animal pathogens worldwide. Vector-borne diseases account for 17% of all infectious diseases resulting in 700,000 human deaths annually. Repellents are a primary tool for reducing the impact of biting arthropods on humans and animals. N,N-Diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET), the most effective and long-lasting repellent currently available commercially, has long been considered the gold standard in insect repellents, but with reported human health issues, particularly for infants and pregnant women. In the present study, we report fatty acids derived from coconut oil which are novel, inexpensive and highly efficacious repellant compounds. These coconut fatty acids are active against a broad array of blood-sucking arthropods including biting flies, ticks, bed bugs and mosquitoes. The medium-chain length fatty acids from C8:0 to C12:0 were found to exhibit the predominant repellent activity. In laboratory bioassays, these fatty acids repelled biting flies and bed bugs for two weeks after application, and ticks for one week. Repellency was stronger and with longer residual activity than that of DEET. In addition, repellency was also found against mosquitoes. An aqueous starch-based formulation containing natural coconut fatty acids was also prepared and shown to protect pastured cattle from biting flies up to 96-hours in the hot summer, which, to our knowledge, is the longest protection provided by a natural repellent product studied to date.

9 October 2015 in Journal of Insect Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JSJosé-Arturo Solórzano
José-Arturo Solórzano
JGJeremie Gilles
Jeremie Gilles
OBOscar Bravo
Oscar Bravo
CVCristina Vargas
Cristina Vargas
YGYannery Gomez-Bonilla
Yannery Gomez-Bonilla
DTDavid Taylor
David Taylor
Pineapple production in Costa Rica increased nearly 300-fold during the last 30 yr, and >40,000 hectares of land are currently dedicated to this crop. At the end of the pineapple cropping cycle, plants are chopped and residues incorporated into the soil in preparation for replanting. Associated with increased pineapple production has been a large increase in stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans (L.), populations. Stable flies are attracted to, and oviposit in, the decomposing, chopped pineapple residues. In conjunction with chemical control of developing larvae, adult trapping is an important control strategy. In this study, four blue-black fabric traps, Nzi, Vavoua, Model H, and Ngu, were compared with a white sticky trap currently used for stable fly control in Costa Rica. Overall, the white sticky trap caught the highest number of stable flies, followed by the Nzi, Vavoua, Model H, and Ngu. Collections on the white sticky trap increased 16 d after residues were chopped; coinciding with the expected emergence of flies developing in the pineapple residues. During this same time period, collections in the blue-black fabric traps decreased. Sex ratio decreased from >7:1 (females:males) 3–7 d after chopping to 1:1 at 24–28 d. White sticky, Nzi and Vavoua traps collected similar numbers of colonizing flies 3–7 d after residues were chopped. However, white sticky traps collected more flies once emergence from the pineapple residues began. Although white sticky traps collected more flies than fabric traps, they remain labor intensive and environmentally unsound because of their disposable and nonbiodegradable nature.

1 January 1996 in Medical and Veterinary Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DTDavid Taylor
David Taylor
ASAllen L. Szalanski
Allen L. Szalanski
RPRichard D. Peterson
Richard D. Peterson