Linda J. Young

Dr. Linda J. Young


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 June 2011 in BMC Genomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLauren M McIntyre
Lauren M McIntyre
KLKenneth K Lopiano
Kenneth K Lopiano
AMAlison Morse
Alison Morse
VAVictor Amin
Victor Amin
AOAnn L Oberg
Ann L Oberg
SNSergey Nuzhdin
Sergey Nuzhdin
RNA-seq is revolutionizing the way we study transcriptomes. mRNA can be surveyed without prior knowledge of gene transcripts. Alternative splicing of transcript isoforms and the identification of previously unknown exons are being reported. Initial reports of differences in exon usage, and splicing between samples as well as quantitative differences among samples are beginning to surface. Biological variation has been reported to be larger than technical variation. In addition, technical variation has been reported to be in line with expectations due to random sampling. However, strategies for dealing with technical variation will differ depending on the magnitude. The size of technical variance, and the role of sampling are examined in this manuscript.

17 April 2007 in Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LYLinda J. Young
Linda J. Young
CGCarol A. Gotway
Carol A. Gotway

1 May 2015 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSChristina Staudhammer
Christina Staudhammer
Francisco J EscobedoFrancisco J Escobedo
Francisco J Escobedo
NHNathan Holt
Nathan Holt
LYLinda J. Young
Linda J. Young
TBThomas J. Brandeis
Thomas J. Brandeis
WZWayne Zipperer
Wayne Zipperer

1 October 2008 in Nursing Administration Quarterly
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LYLinda J. Young
Linda J. Young
Boards of nursing sponsor programs, including those for alternatives to discipline, for recovering nurses. These programs rely on worksite monitors who are oftentimes other nurses or supervisors of nurses, to work with recovering nurses when they return to practice. The skills of these monitors vary with respect to understanding the monitor role and recognizing traits in chemical dependency and relapse. To determine the degree of content value and the best teaching method for monitors to learn program content, 17 currently active worksite monitors participated in a study to evaluate content value to 2 groups, new and experienced monitors, and to select the best method to teach 4 content topics. Results showed that current content was valued without necessary additions and that group instruction in urban areas was preferred over one-to-one instruction. Implementation of study outcomes yielded that issues of confidentiality made group instruction unsatisfactory.

4 March 2008 in Statistics in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LYLinda J. Young
Linda J. Young
CGCarol A. Gotway
Carol A. Gotway
JYJie Yang
Jie Yang
Gregory D. KearneyGregory D. Kearney
Gregory D. Kearney
CDChris DuClos
Chris DuClos

4 January 2010
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
LYLinda J. Young
Linda J. Young
CGCarol A. Gotway
Carol A. Gotway