When the central nervous system (CNS) is the primary affected site in an initial attack of Behçet’s disease (BD), the differential diagnosis is particularly challenging. Some cases remain unclassified or qualified as probable neuro-Behçet’s disease (NBD). Several cytokines are involved in the immunopathogenesis of this disease; however, studies establishing the differential cytokine pattern between probable and definite NBD are scarce. Twenty-eight parenchymal NBD patients, diagnosed according to the International Consensus Recommendation (ICR) criteria and classified into definite (D-NBD; n = 17) and probable (P-NBD; n = 11), were sampled at their first neurological symptoms, and compared with healthy control subjects (n = 20). Oligoclonal bands (OCB) of IgG were detected by isoelectric focusing on agarose, and immunoblotting of matched serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sample pairs. T cell cytokines (INF-γ, IL-4, IL-17, and IL-10) and transcription factors related to Th1, Th2, Th17, and T regulatory populations (respectively T-bet, GATA-3, ROR-γt, and Foxp3) were studied by quantitative RT-PCR in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and CSF cells. Inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β were also analyzed. CSF OCB pattern 2 was present in only 1 out of 28 neuro-Behçet’s patients who belonged to the P-NBD group. Two D-NBD patients had OCB in CSF showing pattern 4. In the D-NBD CSF samples, IL-17 and IL-10 expressions were significantly elevated compared to P-NBD. Moreover, D-NBD patients had increased levels of T-bet/GATA-3 and ROR-γt/Foxp3 ratios compared to P-NBD. Furthermore, a significant increase of CSF IL-6 in D-NBD, compared to P-NBD and the controls, was found. In addition to the increased IL-6 level, the data obtained suggest the existence in D-NBD patients of a significantly disrupted balance between Th17 effector and T regulatory cells, as reflected by the enhanced ROR-γt/Foxp3 ratio. This could be considered as an additional criterion for definite neuro-Behçet’s disease.

Background. Immune response plays a crucial role in virus clearance during COVID-19 infection and underpins vaccine efficacy. Herein, we aimed to assess the immune response during COVID-19 infection and following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Methods. In this retrospective study, 94 confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit were categorized into unvaccinated patients (n = 50), including 33 deceased and 17 discharged patients, and vaccinated group (n = 44) with 26 deceased and 18 discharged patients. Records of patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to the ICU between March, 2021 and March, 2022 were gathered and analyzed. Result. The assessment of immune cell counts revealed a large rise of neutrophils associated to decrease number of lymphocytes in patients with COVID-19 infection. In dead patients, we detected a significant correlation between neutrophils and inflammatory parameters such as IL-6 and CRP. Moreover, analysis of immune cell count following vaccination did not reveal any significant difference. However, the most substantial result, herein, detected is the decrease level of IL-6 in vaccinated patients as compared to unvaccinated. The reduce level of IL-6 following vaccination is observed in discharged patients as compared to deceased. Regarding the level of mortality after vaccination, we showed that all patients who received the first dose were died (46.1%, n = 12) as compared to those who have received two doses (34.6%, n = 9) and the third dose of vaccine (19.23%, n = 3) ( ). Strikingly, studying the inflammatory parameters after each vaccine dose, we revealed a significant decrease of IL-6 level after the booster dose (third dose), especially in vaccinated discharged patients. Conclusions. Neutrophils combined with IL-6 and CRP can be very useful markers to predict disease severity in patients admitted to ICU. The decrease level of IL-6 in vaccinated group pointed out the impact of vaccination to prevent inflammatory cytokine release.

On March 13, 2021, Tunisia started a widespread immunization program against SARS-CoV-2 utilizing different vaccinations that had been given emergency approval. Herein, we followed prospectively a cohort of participant who received COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer BioNTech and Sputnik-Gameleya V). The goal of this follow-up was to define the humoral and cellular immunological profile after immunization by assessing neutralizing antibodies and IFN- γ release. 26 vaccinated health care workers by Pfizer BioNTech (n=12) and Sputnik-Gameleya V (n=14) were enrolled from June to December 2021 in Military hospital of Tunis. All consenting participants were sampled for peripheral blood after three weeks of vaccination. The humoral response was investigated by the titer of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies to S1 protein. The CD4 and CD8 T cell responses were evaluated by the QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 (Qiagen® Basel, Switzerland). Regardless the type of vaccine, the assessment of humoral and cellular response following vaccination showed a strong involvement of the later with expression of IFN-γ as compared to antibodies secretion. Moreover, we showed that people with past SARS-CoV-2 infection developed high levels of antibodies than those who are not previously infected. However, no significant difference was detected concerning interferon gamma (IFN-γ) expression by CD4 and CD8 T cells in health care worker (HCW) previously infection or not with COVID-19 infection. Analysis of immune response according to the type of vaccine, we found that Pfizer BioNTech induced high level of humoral response (91.66%) followed by Sputnik-Gameleya V (64.28%). However, adenovirus vaccine gave a better cellular response (57.14%) than mRNA vaccine (41.66%). Regarding the immune response following vaccine doses, we revealed a significant increase of neutralizing antibodies and IFN-γ release by T cells in patients fully vaccinated as compared to those who have received just one vaccine. Collectively, our data revealed a similar immune response between Pfizer BioNTech and Sputnik-Gameleya V vaccine with a slight increase of humoral response by mRNA vaccine and cellular response by adenovirus vaccine. It's evident that past SARS-CoV-2 infection was a factor that contributed to the vaccination's increased immunogenicity. However, the administration of full doses of vaccines (Pfizer BioNTech or Sputnik-Gameleya V) induces better humoral and cellular responses detectable even more than three months following vaccination.

Background. COVID‐19 is the major cause of serious acute respiratory complications, leading to strong perturbation of cytokine release and high levels of interleukin‐6. In this work, we assessed the efficacy and safety of Tocilizumab in Tunisian patients with severe COVID‐19. Materials and Methods. We enrolled in this retrospective study 255 critically ill patients in the intensive care unit of the military hospital of Tunis. These patients were categorized into a standard group (n = 148) and a Tocilizumab group (n = 107). Medical records were gathered and analyzed between September, 2020 and September, 2021. Results. No significant difference was detected in clinical and biological parameters at admission between the two studied groups. Interestingly, we revealed here a significant improvement in respiratory parameters as well as biological findings such as hemoglobin (p = 0.001), platelets (p = 0.005), CRP (p = 0.0001), fibrinogen (p = 0.0001), and creatinine (p = 0.002). Regarding the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and 28‐day mortality, we showed a significant decrease of these two parameters following 48 hr of drug administration (p = 0.0001, respectively). No significant difference between the two groups regarding complications except the renal failure and the need for renal replacement therapy, which are higher in the standard group as compared to patients treated with Tocilizumab (p = 0.02; p = 0.0001, respectively). Conclusions. Treatment with TCZ seems to be safe and effective in reducing the mortality rate in severe COVID‐19 patients.