Background Deep learning (DL) reconstructions can enhance image quality while decreasing MRI acquisition time. However, DL reconstruction methods combined with compressed sensing for prostate MRI have not been well studied. Purpose To use an industry-developed DL algorithm to reconstruct low-resolution T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE) prostate MRI scans and compare these with standard sequences. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, participants with suspected prostate cancer underwent prostate MRI with a Cartesian standard-resolution T2-weighted TSE sequence (T2_C) and non-Cartesian standard-resolution T2-weighted TSE sequence (T2_NC) between August and November 2022. Additionally, a low-resolution Cartesian DL-reconstructed T2-weighted TSE sequence (T2_DL) with compressed sensing DL denoising and resolution upscaling reconstruction was acquired. Image sharpness was assessed qualitatively by two readers using a five-point Likert scale (from 1 = nondiagnostic to 5 = excellent) and quantitatively by calculating edge rise distance. The Friedman test and one-way analysis of variance with post hoc Bonferroni and Tukey tests, respectively, were used for group comparisons. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score agreement between sequences was compared by using Cohen κ. Results This study included 109 male participants (mean age, 68 years ± 8 [SD]). Acquisition time of T2_DL was 36% and 29% lower compared with that of T2_C and T2_NC (mean duration, 164 seconds ± 20 vs 257 seconds ± 32 and 230 seconds ± 28; P < .001 for both). T2_DL showed improved image sharpness compared with standard sequences using both qualitative (median score, 5 [IQR, 4-5] vs 4 [IQR, 3-4] for T2_C and 4 [IQR, 3-4] for T2_NC; P < .001 for both) and quantitative (mean edge rise distance, 0.75 mm ± 0.39 vs 1.15 mm ± 0.68 for T2_C and 0.98 mm ± 0.65 for T2_NC; P < .001 and P = .01) methods. PI-RADS score agreement between T2_NC and T2_DL was excellent (κ range, 0.92-0.94 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.98]). Conclusion DL reconstruction of low-resolution T2-weighted TSE sequences enabled accelerated acquisition times and improved image quality compared with standard acquisitions while showing excellent agreement with conventional sequences for PI-RADS ratings. Clinical trial registration no. NCT05820113 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Turkbey in this issue.

Background: The methylation status of Septin 9 (SEPT9) and short stature homeobox 2 (SHOX2) in circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) are validated pan-cancer biomarkers. The present proof-of-concept study aimed to investigate the potential and dynamics of quantitative SEPT9 and SHOX2 methylation in prostate cancer (PCa) patient tissue and ccfDNA during prostate biopsy as a diagnostic tool. Methods: The methylation patterns of SEPT9 and SHOX2 in prostate tissue were analyzed using The Cancer Genome Atlas data set (n = 498 PCa and n = 50 normal adjacent prostate tissue (NAT)). Next, dynamic changes of ccfDNA methylation were quantified in prospectively enrolled patients undergoing prostate biopsy (n = 72), local treatment for PCa (n = 7; radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy) as well as systemic treatment for PCa (n = 6; chemotherapy and 177-Lu-PSMA-therapy). Biomarker levels were correlated with clinicopathological parameters. Results: SEPT9 and SHOX2 were hypermethylated in PCa tissue (p < 0.001) and allowed discrimination of PCa and non-tumor prostate tissue (mSEPT9: AUC 0.87, 95%CI [0.82–0.92]; mSHOX2: AUC 0.89, 95%CI 0.84–0.94). SHOX2 methylation and mRNA levels were significantly higher in PCa tissue and increased with tumor stage and grade, as well as in patients suffering from biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. SEPT9 and SHOX2 ccfDNA methylation allowed distinguishing patients with localized and metastatic disease (p < 0.001 for both). In addition, methylation levels increased shortly after prostate biopsy only in patients with PCa (ΔmSEPT9: p < 0.001 and ΔmSHOX2: p = 0.001). Conclusions: The early dynamics of methylated SEPT9 and SHOX2 in ccfDNA allow differentiation between PCa patients and patients without PCa and is a promising marker for tumor monitoring in the metastatic stage to determine tumor burden under systemic therapy.

Background: The primary objective is to determine the proportion of men with suspected prostate cancer (PCA) in whom the management plans are changed by additive gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) guided prostate biopsy (PET-TB) in combination with standard of care (SOC) using systematic (SB) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy (MR-TB) compared with SOC alone. The major secondary objectives are to determine the additive value of the combined approach of SB + MR-TB + PET-TB (PET/MR-TB) for detecting clinically significant PCA (csPCA) compared to SOC; to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of imaging techniques, respective imaging classification systems, and each biopsy method; and to compare preoperatively defined tumor burden and biomarker expression and pathological tumor extent in prostate specimens. Methods: The DEPROMP study is a prospective, open-label, interventional investigator-initiated trial. Risk stratification and management plans after PET/MR-TB are conducted randomized and blinded by different evaluation teams of experienced urologists based on histopathological analysis and imaging information: one including all results of the PET/MR-TB and one excluding the additional information gained by PSMA-PET/CT guided biopsy. The power calculation was centered on pilot data, and we will recruit up to 230 biopsy-naïve men who will undergo PET/MR-TB for suspected PCA. Conduct and reporting of MRI and PSMA-PET/CT will be performed in a blinded fashion. Discussion: The DEPROMP Trial will be the first to evaluate the clinically relevant effects of the use of PSMA-PET/CT in patients with suspected PCA compared to current SOC. The study will provide prospective data to determine the diagnostic yields of additional PET-TB in men with suspected PCA and the impact on treatment plans in terms of intra- and intermodal changes. The results will allow a comparative analysis of risk stratification by each biopsy method, including a performance analysis of the corresponding rating systems. This will reveal potential intermethod and pre- and postoperative discordances of tumor stage and grading, providing the opportunity to critically assess the need for multiple biopsies. Trial registration: German Clinical Study Register DRKS 00024134. Registered on 26 January 2021.

Purpose: Additive systematic biopsy (SB) contributes to prostate cancer (PCA) detection in MRI-targeted biopsy (TB). However, the reasons for this are not yet clear. We compared the performance of TB, SB and the combined approach (CB) in biopsy-naive men to determine the added value of SB for tumor grading and spatial tumor distribution. Methods: Two hundred and fifty-nine men with PI-RADS 3–5 graded lesions who underwent CB were enrolled. Data were prospectively collected, and cancer detection rates (CDR) were compared at patient and lesion level. Gleason grade up- and down-grading from biopsy to prostatectomy specimens (n = 56; 21.6%) were determined. Clinically significant cancer (csPCA) was defined as Gleason grade ≥ 2. Results: CDR by CB based on PI-RADS categories 3, 4 and 5 for PCA were 24%, 72% and 98% and 17%, 64% and 96% for csPCA. CB detected more PCA and csPCA than TB (p < 0.001). However, TB showed higher efficiency, defined as CDR per biopsy core, for PCA and csPCA in PI-RADS 4–5 rated patients (p < 0.001). Concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy grading was highest in CB with misdiagnosis of csPCA in 25% of men. TB missed cancer attributed to the index lesion in 10.2% and underestimated csPCA in 7%. In these cases, 76% of csPCA were detected and 85% were upgraded to csPCA by SB in adjacent sectors. Conclusion: SB cannot be safely abundant without increased diagnostic uncertainty. When TB missed csPCA, SB detected it close to the MRI-target lesion. Therefore, perifocal biopsies could potentially replace 12-core SB with increased efficiency in taking manageable risks.

Purpose: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion targeted prostate biopsy (MR-TB) has emerged to the biopsy technique of choice for evaluation of patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCA). The study aimed to determine expected and experienced pain during MR-TB depending on patients’ psychological state. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 108 men with suspicion of PCA who underwent MR-TB. All patients completed self-reported validated questionnaires assessing pain, stress, self-efficacy, anxiety and study-specific questionnaires on expected and experienced pain before, during and after MR-TB. Patient characteristics and survey scores were obtained. Results: Overall, pain levels during MR-TB were low (mean 2.8/10 ± 2.5 Numerical Rating Scale, NRS). 10/86 (11.6%) participants reported severe pain (≥ 7/10 NRS). Pain correlated significantly with anxiety (r = 0.42), stress (r = 0.22) and pain expectancy (r = 0.58). High self-efficacy did not show increased pain resilience. Participants anticipated more pain than experienced during each step of MR-TB with significant differences concerning local anesthesia and core sampling (both p < 0.001), among others. Expectancy and actual pain did not match regarding severity and impact of the total amount of cores taken (p < 0.05). Independent predictors of increased pain at biopsy were prostate volume > 50 ml (p = 0.0179) and expected pain during rectal manipulation (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Pain during MR-TB can be positively influenced by reducing men’s anxiety, stress and pain expectancy. To meet the needs of the audience, clinicians should address concrete pain levels of each procedural step and consider special treatment for patients with prostate volume > 50 ml and men reporting on increased rectal sensitivity.

Objective: To evaluate the potential utility of antibody‐drug conjugates targeting trophoblast cell surface antigen‐2 (TROP‐2) in patients with primary penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC), patients with recurrence (REC cohort), and patient‐matched distant metastases (MET cohort), and to assess the potential use of TROP‐2 as a predictive non‐invasive biomarker in PSCC. Methods: A cohort comprising a PRIM ( n = 37), REC ( n = 5) and MET subcohort ( n = 7), with MET including lymph node and lung metastases, was analysed using quantitative real‐time PCR, ELISA and immunohistochemical staining with evaluation of H‐score. Results: TROP‐2 mRNA and serum protein levels were significantly increased in primary and recurrent PSCC compared to cancer‐free controls (both P < 0.001). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that most of the PRIM cohort ( n = 34/37, median H‐score 260, interquartile range [IQR] 210–300), as well as all patients in the REC (median [IQR] H‐score 200 [165–290]) and MET cohorts (median [IQR] H‐score 280 [260–300]) exhibited moderate to strong membranous TROP‐2 expression. Additionally, The H‐score (membranous TROP‐2 expression) was positively correlated with TROP‐2 mRNA ( ρ = 0.69, P < 0.0001, R ² = 0.70) and protein levels ( ρ = 0.86, P < 0.0001, R ² = 0.59), indicating its potential as a non‐invasive biomarker in PSCC. Conclusion: In summary, our results support further studies on TROP‐2 as a diagnostic and therapeutic target in primary, recurrent and metastatic PSCC.