Hee Seung Kim

Prof. Hee Seung Kim


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2019 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKSe Ik Kim
Se Ik Kim
JCJae Hyun Cho
Jae Hyun Cho
ASAeran Seol
Aeran Seol
YKYoung Im Kim
Young Im Kim
MLMaria Lee
Maria Lee
Yong Sang SongYong Sang Song
Yong Sang Song

1 January 2015 in Frontiers in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YHYoon-Hee Hong
Yoon-Hee Hong
MUMd Hafiz Uddin
Md Hafiz Uddin
UJUntek Jo
Untek Jo
BKBoyun Kim
Boyun Kim
JSJiyoung Song
Jiyoung Song
Yong Sang SongYong Sang Song
Yong Sang Song
Unfolded protein response (UPR) is crucial for both survival and death of mammalian cells, which is regulated by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nutrient depletion. In this study, we demonstrated the effect of ROS-accumulation, induced by β-phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC), on UPR mediated apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells. We used ovarian cancer cell lines, PA-1 and SKOV-3, with different p53 status (wild- and null- type, respectively). PEITC caused increased ROS-accumulation and inhibited proliferation selectively in ovarian cancer cells, and glutathione (GSH) depletion in SKOV-3. However, PEITC did not cause any effect in normal ovarian epithelial cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. After 48 h of PEITC treatment (5 µM), apoptotic cell death was shown to increase significantly in the ovarian cancer cells and not in the normal cells. The key regulator of UPR-mediated apoptosis, CHOP/GADD153 and ER resident chaperone BiP/GRP78 were parallely up-regulated with activation of two major sensors of the UPR (PERK and ATF-6 in PA-1; PERK, and IRE1α in SKOV-3) in response to ROS accumulation induced by PEITC (5 µM). ROS scavenger, N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC), attenuated the effect of PEITC on UPR signatures (P-PERK, IRE1α, CHOP/GADD153, and BiP/GRP78), suggesting the involvement of ROS in UPR-mediated apoptosis. Altogether, PEITC induces UPR-mediated apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells via accumulation of ROS in a cancer-specific manner.

7 May 2019 in Journal of Ovarian Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSe Ik Kim
Se Ik Kim
MLMaria Lee
Maria Lee
HKHee Seung Kim
Hee Seung Kim
HCHyun Hoon Chung
Hyun Hoon Chung
HKHak Jae Kim
Hak Jae Kim
Yong Sang SongYong Sang Song
Yong Sang Song
To evaluate impact of germline BRCA mutational status on prognosis in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. A total of 128 patients diagnosed with FIGO stage III-IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) between 2008 and 2017 and underwent BRCA1/2 gene testing at the time of or within two years from cancer diagnosis were included in this study. We compared patients’ clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes after primary treatment according to germline BRCA mutational status. Treatment-related factors that might affect patients’ survival outcome were also investigated. Germline BRCA1/2 mutations were observed in 51 women (39.8%). There were no differences in age and serum CA-125 levels at the time of HGSOC diagnosis, use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), extent of debulking surgery, and overall survival (OS) between the BRCA mutation and wild-type BRCA groups. In contrast, the BRCA mutation group displayed longer progression-free survival (PFS) (median, 22.9 vs. 16.9 months, P = 0.001). Multivariate analyses identified germline BRCA1/2 mutation as an independent favorable prognostic factor for PFS (adjusted HR, 0.502; 95% CI, 0.318–0.795; P = 0.003). In the wild-type BRCA group, patients who received NAC as the primary treatment had shorter PFS compared to those who received primary debulking surgery (PDS) (median, 14.2 vs. 16.9 months, P = 0.003). However, in the BRCA mutation group, PFS did not differ between the NAC and PDS groups (P = 0.082). In advanced-stage HGSOC, patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations have better prognosis with longer PFS than those lacking BRCA mutations. Prognosis after NAC was different according to the BRCA mutational status.

1 October 2019 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKSe Ik Kim
Se Ik Kim
MLMaria Lee
Maria Lee
SLSungyoung Lee
Sungyoung Lee
DSDong Hoon Suh
Dong Hoon Suh
HKHee Seung Kim
Hee Seung Kim
YKYong Beom Kim
Yong Beom Kim

21 May 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSe Ik Kim
Se Ik Kim
NKNayeon Kang
Nayeon Kang
SLSangseob Leem
Sangseob Leem
Jinho YangJinho Yang
Jinho Yang
HJHyunA Jo
HyunA Jo
Yong Sang SongYong Sang Song
Yong Sang Song
We aimed to develop a diagnostic model identifying ovarian cancer (OC) from benign ovarian tumors using metagenomic data from serum microbe-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs). We obtained serum samples from 166 patients with pathologically confirmed OC and 76 patients with benign ovarian tumors. For model construction and validation, samples were randomly divided into training and test sets in the ratio 2:1. Isolation of microbial EVs from serum samples of the patients and 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing were carried out. Metagenomic and clinicopathologic data-based OC diagnostic models were constructed in the training set and then validated in the test set. There were significant differences in the metagenomic profiles between the OC and benign ovarian tumor groups; specifically, genus Acinetobacter was significantly more abundant in the OC group. More importantly, Acinetobacter was the only common genus identified by seven different statistical analysis methods. Among the various metagenomic and clinicopathologic data-based OC diagnostic models, the model consisting of age, serum CA-125 levels, and relative abundance of Acinetobacter showed the best diagnostic performance with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.898 and 0.846 in the training and test sets, respectively. Thus, our findings establish a metagenomic analysis of serum microbe-derived EVs as a potential tool for the diagnosis of OC.

1 January 2017 in Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYanlin Luo
Yanlin Luo
HKHee Seung Kim
Hee Seung Kim
MKMiseon Kim
Miseon Kim
MLMaria Lee
Maria Lee
Yong Sang SongYong Sang Song
Yong Sang Song
Luo Y, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Mar;28(3):e36. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e36