Background: A clear patency benefit of a drug-eluting stent (DES) over bare metal stents (BMSs) for treating peripheral artery disease of the femoropopliteal segment has not been definitively demonstrated. The EMINENT study (Trial Comparing Eluvia Versus Bare Metal Stent in Treatment of Superficial Femoral and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery) was designed to evaluate the patency of the Eluvia DES (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA), a polymer-coated paclitaxel-eluting stent, compared with BMSs for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery lesions. Methods: EMINENT is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter European study with blinded participants and outcome assessment. Patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (Rutherford category 2, 3, or 4) of the native superficial femoral artery or proximal popliteal artery with stenosis ≥70%, vessel diameter of 4 to 6 mm, and total lesion length of 30 to 210 mm were randomly assigned 2:1 to treatment with DES or BMS. The primary effectiveness outcome was primary patency at 12 months, defined as independent core laboratory–assessed duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio ≤2.4 in the absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization or surgical bypass of the target lesion. Primary sustained clinical improvement was a secondary outcome defined as a decrease in Rutherford classification of ≥1 categories compared with baseline without a repeat target lesion revascularization. Health-related quality of life and walking function were assessed. Results: A total of 775 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with DES (n=508) or commercially available BMSs (n=267). Baseline clinical, demographic, and lesion characteristics were similar between the study groups. Mean lesion length was 75.6±50.3 and 72.2±47.0 mm in the DES and BMS groups, respectively. The 12-month incidence of primary patency for DES treatment (83.2% [337 of 405]) was significantly greater than for BMS (74.3% [165 of 222]; P<0.01). Incidence of primary sustained clinical improvement was greater among patients treated with the DES than among those who received a BMS (83.0% versus 76.6%; P=0.045). The health-related quality of life dimensions of mobility and pain/discomfort improved for the majority of patients in both groups (for 66.4% and 53.6% of DES-treated and for 64.2% and 58.1% of BMS-treated patients, respectively) but did not differ significantly. At 12 months, no statistical difference was observed in all-cause mortality between patients treated with the DES or BMS (2.7% [13 of 474] versus 1.1% [3 of 263]; relative risk, 2.4 [95% CI, 0.69–8.36]; P=0.15). Conclusions: By demonstrating superior 1-year primary patency, the results of the EMINENT randomized study support the benefit of using a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent as a first-line stent-based intervention for patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease attributable to femoropopliteal lesions. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02921230.

Purpose: The performance of self-expanding interwoven nitinol stent (Supera) in femoropopliteal interventions has been proven through trials with short lesions and with relatively low proportion of occlusions. There is limited evidence of Supera stent in long lesions. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical safety and efficiency of the Supera stent in the treatment of long femoropopliteal lesions (Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus [TASC] C/D) in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Methods: The STELLA SUPERA (STEnting Long de L’Artère fémorale superficielle par le stent métallique Supera) is a prospective, 2-center, single-arm study. Patients with symptomatic (Rutherford stages 2–6) de novo and TASC C/D lesions of the femoropopliteal segment were treated with Supera stent. The primary endpoint was the primary sustained clinical improvement at 12 months. Follow-up included clinical examination, duplex scan, and biplane X-ray up to 24 months. Results: Between December 2016 and October 2018, 48 symptomatic patients with 49 femoropopliteal lesions (TASC D = 32, 65%) were treated. The mean lesion length was 234 ± 123 mm, and 78% were total occlusion. The mean stented lesion length was 273 ± 127 mm. At 12 and 24 months, the primary sustained clinical improvement rate was 87.2% and 79.7%, respectively. The Rutherford category assessment was significantly improved at 24 months compared with baseline (p=0.02). At 24 months, the primary patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates were 77.9% and 86.9%, respectively. The ankle-brachial pressure index increased from 0.62 ± 0.15 at baseline to 0.93 ± 0.15 at 24 months (p<0.0001). There were no stent fractures at 24 months. Conclusion: The use of Supera stent in long lesions (TASC C/D) is a safe and effective endovascular alternative. These results reinforce the need for randomized clinical trials to assess the value of interwoven stents for long femoropopliteal lesions.