Purpose: Smartphone addiction is prevalent among medical students, and there is a concern that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic fueled a rise in smartphone addiction. Earlier studies suggest a link between excessive smartphone usage and negative outcomes such as depression, stress, and reduced academic achievement. However, there is a dearth of both local studies in Saudi Arabia and studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic exploring the prevalence of smartphone addiction and its association with academic performance, depression, and perceived stress, which is the purpose of the current study. Methods: In 2021, a cross-sectional research project took place among medical students at King Saud University and the Vision Colleges located in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. An online self-administered questionnaire consisting of demographic variables, grade point average (GPA), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Perceived Stress Scale-4 (PSS-4), and the Smartphone Addiction Scale—Short Version (SAS-SV) was deployed. Results: Three hundred and fifteen students participated. Around 47.9% of students reported smartphone addiction, and the mean SAS-SV score was 32.31 ± 12.01 points. Both PHQ-9 and PSS-4 scores showed a significant positive correlation with the SAS-SV score (r = 0.216, p < 0.001 and r = 247, p < 0.001, respectively), while GPA did not (r = −0.027, p = 0.639). An adjusted analysis showed that the PSS-4 score was positively associated with the SAS-SV score (odds ratio (OR) = 1.206, p < 0.001), while the PHQ-9 score was not (OR = 102, p = 0.285). Conclusions: Smartphone addiction is prevalent among medical students and associated with perceived stress. Additional research is required to gain a deeper comprehension of this issue and to assess the success of intervention initiatives aimed at encouraging healthy smartphone usage, particularly in times of crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic.

As a result of the increasing global incidence of obesity and related diseases, this study aims to investigate the prevalence of obesity and its correlation with eating disorder (ED) screening among medical students to develop effective prevention strategies and provide better outcomes for these students. We conducted a quantitative analytical cross-sectional study at the College of Medicine at King Saud University between November 2023 and February 2024. A stratified random sampling technique was utilized, enrolling a net number of 415 participants. Participants were asked several questions, including demographic information, weight, height, and past medical history, and were given a validated screening tool for EDs. Participants’ mean age was 21.4 ± 1.67 years, and 17.6% were considered obese. The prevalence of positive screening for EDs was 27.7%; it was more common in females (p = 0.013) and those who earned more than 1000 SAR per month (p = 0.011). Female students also exhibited almost twice the odds of having EDs than males (AOR = 1.957; 95% CI = 1.218–3.146; p = 0.006). Furthermore, non-obese students showed decreased odds of having EDs compared with obese students by at least 48% (AOR = 0.517; 95% CI = 0.287–0.929; p = 0.027). Our study revealed a concerning prevalence of ED symptoms and obesity among medical students, suggesting profound implications. Therefore, multicenter studies are needed to assess the generalizability of the results and apply the findings to targeted national campaigns and interventions tailored specifically to medical students.

Background/aim: Medical students often face intense pressure to excel, which can lead to imposterism, characterized by persistent self-doubt and fear of being exposed as inadequate, alongside high levels of perfectionism. This study aims to assess the prevalence of imposterism and perfectionism among medical students in Saudi Arabia and explore their potential implications for student well-being. Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted between October and December 2024 among female medical students in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected via an online survey, which included demographic questions, the validated Arabic versions of the Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale (Ar-CIPS), the short form of the Big Three Perfectionism Scale (BTPS-SF), and the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES). Results: A total of 265 medical students (mean age 20.96 ± 1.44 years) participated. Most reported a monthly income of less than 2000 SR, and the majority had a GPA above 4.5. A 74.3% expressed moderate impostor experiences. The BTPS-SF revealed the highest scores in self-critical perfectionism, followed by narcissistic and rigid perfectionism. Higher impostor scores were significantly associated with greater perfectionism and lower self-efficacy (p < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, BTPS-SF scores positively predicted CIPS scores (β = 0.52, p < 0.001), whereas GSE scores predicted lower CIPS scores (β = −0.47, p = 0.001). Conclusions: This study revealed a high prevalence of impostor phenomenon and perfectionism among female medical students, with self-critical perfectionism being the most prominent. Imposterism was significantly associated with higher perfectionism and lower self-efficacy.

Background and aim: Patient satisfaction is a critical indicator of healthcare quality, shaping treatment adherence, continuity of care, and the allocation of resources. The Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS) is a brief, reliable tool that is widely used internationally, but no validated Arabic version currently exists. Therefore, this study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the SAPS into Arabic for use in primary care clinics. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional validation study at general practice clinics of a tertiary academic hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (June–August 2025). Consecutive Arabic-speaking patients aged 18–80 were recruited post-visit and completed a self-administered electronic survey including the Arabic Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (Ar-SAPS), PSQ-18, and PDRQ-9, as well as demographic and visit variables. Psychometric testing included internal consistency, test–retest reliability, construct validity, and factor analysis. Results: A total of 273 participants enrolled in our study. The Ar-SAPS demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.789; McDonald’s ω = 0.882) and moderate test–retest stability (ICC = 0.634, p < 0.0001). Factor analysis supported a primarily unidimensional structure, with the first factor explaining 60.2% of variance. Most inter-item correlations were moderate to strong, except for item 6. Convergent validity was supported by significant correlations with the Arabic PDRQ-9 (r = 0.623, p < 0.001, CI [0.532, 0.713]) and PSQ-18 (r = 0.662, p < 0.001, CI [0.531, 0.793]), confirming consistency with established measures of patient satisfaction. Furthermore, it demonstrated excellent discriminative ability, with areas under the curve of 0.965 for overall satisfaction and 0.955 for willingness to recommend. Conclusion: The Ar-SAPS is valid and reliable for use to assess patient satisfaction.

Background/objectives: Cognitive flexibility is the mental skill that allows a person to shift between different ideas or concepts and think about several concepts simultaneously. A commonly used tool to assess cognitive flexibility is the Cognitive Flexibility Scale (CFS). This study focused on translating and validating the CFS into Arabic, given the lack of existing Arabic tools for assessing cognitive flexibility. Methods: Conducted at King Saud University, Riyadh, between April and June 2024, the study employed random sampling and involved 529 participants, including 419 students and 110 patients. Results: The average participant age was 25.8 years, with females making up 56.9% of the sample. Participants completed the Arabic CFS, along with the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), at two time points 3–6 weeks apart. Reliability was evaluated through internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.8) and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.82). Item analysis indicated that removing any single item did not significantly impact overall reliability, and inter-item correlations were strongest between items 4 and 6 (0.55) and items 6 and 7 (0.51). Validity was assessed through face, content, and construct validity, with factor analysis revealing a dominant single component accounting for 34.4% of the variance, confirming the scale’s unidimensionality. Content validity indices for all items exceeded 0.9 in terms of relevance, importance, simplicity, and clarity. The Arabic CFS demonstrated good construct validity, showing significant correlations with the ERQ’s reappraisal and suppression dimensions and the PSS. Conclusion: In conclusion, the Arabic version of the CFS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing cognitive flexibility in Arabic-speaking populations. This tool will be valuable in both clinical and research settings within Saudi Arabia, offering a robust instrument for evaluating cognitive flexibility.

Background: Excessive sun exposure is a major modifiable risk factor for skin cancer, with ultraviolet (UV) radiation identified as a key contributor. Saudi Arabia’s high UV index and hot climate increase the risk of photo-induced skin damage among residents. Although awareness of sun protection is growing, inconsistent use of preventive measures persists, often due to misconceptions and limited knowledge. This study aimed to assess patterns of current and prior sun exposure across demographic groups in Saudi Arabia using the validated Arabic version of the Sun Exposure and Behaviour Inventory (Ar-SEBI). Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted between August 2024 and January 2025 across all five Saudi regions using non-probability quota sampling to ensure geographic representation. Sun-exposure practices and protective behaviours were measured using the Ar-SEBI. Data were collected via an online questionnaire and analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26. Normality was assessed via Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests. Depending on the distribution, data were analysed using the Mann–Whitney U test, the Kruskal–Wallis H test, unpaired t-tests, or ANOVA. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 11,491 adults participated. Significant demographic and regional differences in sun-related behaviours were observed. Overall, 72.7% of participants were unaware of the SPF level of their sunscreen. Males and individuals under 30 years of age had significantly higher sun exposure scores than females and older adults, respectively (p < 0.001). Residents of the Southern region had the highest exposure and behaviour scores (p < 0.001), despite also reporting higher engagement in some protective measures. Additionally, sun exposure scores increased progressively with darker Fitzpatrick skin types (IV–VI) (p < 0.001), suggesting a common belief that darker skin confers adequate protection. Conclusions: This study reveals notable disparities in sun-protection practices across Saudi Arabia. Younger adults, males, and individuals with darker skin types reported greater sun exposure and indicators of lower protective awareness. These findings support the need for targeted, culturally tailored public health campaigns and policy measures to enhance sun safety and reduce long-term dermatological risks.