Antimicrobial drug resistance is one of the major threats to global health. It has made common infections increasingly difficult or impossible to treat, and leads to higher medical costs, prolonged hospital stays and increased mortality. Infection rates due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) are increasing globally. Active agents against MDRO are limited despite an increased in the availability of novel antibiotics in recent years. This guideline aims to assist clinicians in the management of infections due to MDRO. The 2019 Guidelines Recommendations for Evidence-based Antimicrobial agents use in Taiwan (GREAT) working group, comprising of infectious disease specialists from 14 medical centers in Taiwan, reviewed current evidences and drafted recommendations for the treatment of infections due to MDRO. A nationwide expert panel reviewed the recommendations during a consensus meeting in Aug 2020, and the guideline was endorsed by the Infectious Diseases Society of Taiwan (IDST). This guideline includes recommendations for selecting antimicrobial therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. The guideline takes into consideration the local epidemiology, and includes antimicrobial agents that may not yet be available in Taiwan. It is intended to serve as a clinical guide and not to supersede the clinical judgment of physicians in the management of individual patients.

Pneumonia is a leading cause of death worldwide, ranking third both globally and in Taiwan. This guideline was prepared by the 2017 Guidelines Recommendations for Evidence-based Antimicrobial agents use in Taiwan (GREAT) working group, formed under the auspices of the Infectious Diseases Society of Taiwan (IDST). A consensus meeting was held jointly by the IDST, Taiwan Society of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (TSPCCM), the Medical Foundation in Memory of Dr. Deh-Lin Cheng, the Foundation of Professor Wei-Chuan Hsieh for Infectious Diseases Research and Education and CY Lee's Research Foundation for Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines. The final guideline was endorsed by the IDST and TSPCCM. The major differences between this guideline and the 2007 version include the following: the use of GRADE methodology for the evaluation of available evidence whenever applicable, the specific inclusion of healthcare-associated pneumonia as a category due to the unique medical system in Taiwan and inclusion of recommendations for treatment of pediatric pneumonia. This guideline includes the epidemiology and recommendations of antimicrobial treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia, ventilator-associated pneumonia, healthcare-associated pneumonia in adults and pediatric pneumonia.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged as a pandemic that spread rapidly around the world, causing nearly 500 billion infections and more than 6 million deaths to date. During the first wave of the pandemic, empirical antibiotics was prescribed in over 70% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. However, research now shows a low incidence rate of bacterial coinfection in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, between 2.5% and 5.1%. The rate of secondary infections was 3.7% in overall, but can be as high as 41.9% in the intensive care units. Over-prescription of antibiotics to treat COVID-19 patients fueled the ongoing antimicrobial resistance globally. Diagnosis of bacterial coinfection is challenging due to indistinguishable clinical presentations with overlapping lower respiratory tract symptoms such as fever, cough and dyspnea. Other diagnostic methods include conventional culture, diagnostic syndromic testing, serology test and biomarkers. COVID-19 patients with bacterial coinfection or secondary infection have a higher in-hospital mortality and longer length of stay, timely and appropriate antibiotic use aided by accurate diagnosis is crucial to improve patient outcome and prevent antimicrobial resistance.

Observation and feedback are core strategies of hand hygiene (HH) improvement. Direct overt observation is currently the gold standard method. Observation bias, also known as the Hawthorne effect, is a major disadvantage of this method. Our aim was to examine the variation of the Hawthorne effect on HH observation in different healthcare groups and settings. A prospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary teaching hospital during a 15-month period. Up to 38 overt observers (82% nurses) and 93 covert observers (81% medical students) participated in HH observation. The HH events observed overtly were matched for occupation, department, observation time, and location with those observed covertly. The data of matched pairs were then analysed to detect possible Hawthorne effects on different variables. A total of 31,522 HH opportunities were observed (4581 overtly, 26,941 covertly). There were 3047 matched pairs after 1:1 matching of overt and covert observations. The overall HH compliance was higher with overt observation than with covert observation (78% vs. 55%, p < 0.001). The Hawthorne effect was nearly three times larger in nurses (30 percentage points) than in physicians (11 percentage points) and was significantly greater in outpatient clinics (41 percentage points) than in intensive care units (11 percentage points). The magnitude of the Hawthorne effect varied among healthcare worker occupations and observation locations (p values both < 0.001) but not among departments, observation times, or HH indications. Heterogeneity in the Hawthorne effect may influence the interpretation of overt observations and prevent the correct identification of target populations with poor HH compliance. Therefore, directly observed HH compliance may not be an adequate performance indicator for infection control.

Nontuberculous mycobacterial infections and colonization are becoming more prevalent worldwide. Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC) is one of the predominant pathogens capable of a wide spectrum of infections, with 50% of infections involving the lungs. The decision to commence treatment is determined according to the severity of the disease, risk of progressive disease, presence of comorbidities, and goals of treatment. MABC is resistant to standard antituberculous agents and has variable drug susceptibility across different geographical locations, therefore, antibiotic susceptibility testing of all clinically significant isolates is crucial for selecting a treatment strategy. Pulmonary infections due to MABC is difficult to cure using the currently recommended regimens from the American Thoracic Society and British Thoracic Society. Macrolides are the cornerstone of treatment, but the efficacy of macrolide-based chemotherapy may be compromised by resistance. Despite the introduction of new drugs for treatment, treatment outcomes remain unsatisfactory. The combination of surgical resection of limited lung disease regions with a multidrug, macrolide-based therapy offers the optimal chance of achieving clinical cure of the disease. This review focuses on medical treatment of MABC-lung disease and the efficacy of new agents, such as clofazimine, amikacin inhalation therapy, tigecycline and linezolid, for treating MABC-lung disease.