Background: Postsurgical pain control can have a significant impact on patient outcomes and hospital-associated costs. We sought to evaluate the effect of intercostal nerve blocks using liposomal bupivacaine on length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed outcomes in 80 patients undergoing VATS wedge resection, VATS lobectomy, or minimally-invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Patients received either liposomal bupivacaine (n=40) or standard-release bupivacaine with epinephrine (n=40) via intercostal nerve block. The LOS, 24-hour postoperative pain scores, overall opioid usage, and patient ambulation rates at 24 hours were compared for the two groups. Results: The median LOS was significantly shorter in patients receiving liposomal bupivacaine, at 1.35 days (IQR, 1.28 to 1.53 days) compared to 2.45 days (IQR, 2.08 to 3.51 days) in patients receiving standard-release bupivacaine (P<0.0001). Average post-operative pain score during the first 24 hours was 3.4±1.8 for the liposomal bupivacaine group and 2.3±1.2 for the control group (P=0.002). This difference, though statistically significant, is likely not clinically significant, as there was no difference in 24-hour postoperative intravenous morphine equivalent usage between the liposomal bupivacaine and control groups (29.8±21.0 vs. 31.9±20.9 mg, respectively, P=0.664). Interestingly, however, 93% (37/40) of patients receiving liposomal bupivacaine were able to ambulate within 24-hours after surgery, compared to 65% (26/40) of patients in the control group (P=0.003). Conclusions: The use of liposomal bupivacaine is associated with decreased LOS in postoperative thoracic surgery patients and earlier return to ambulation. It does not, however, decrease 24-hour postoperative pain scores or opioid usage.

With the evolution of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE), questions remain regarding the benefits and indications of these methods. Given that set indications do not exist, this article aims first to review the reported outcomes of MIE, RAMIE, and open esophagectomy. Then, considerations based on the reported outcomes are discussed to guide surgeons in selecting the best approach. MIE and RAMIE offer the potential to improve outcomes for esophagectomy patients; however, surgeon experience as well as individual patient factors play important roles when deciding upon the surgical approach.

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality for most ethnic groups of Asian American women, including Chinese, Korean, Japanese, and Vietnamese Americans, a striking pattern given the exceedingly low prevalence of smoking among Asian American women in the general population. Recent research demonstrates that among Asian American women with a lung cancer diagnosis, the vast majority of patients have never smoked, a rate as high as 80% among Chinese and Asian Indian American women. Despite declining rates in lung cancer overall in the United States, rates among Asian American women who have never smoked appear to be increasing. This commentary articulates extant knowledge, based on studies in Asia, of a range of risk factors, such as a family history of lung cancer; a history of lung diseases, including tuberculosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; exposure to cooking fumes and second-hand smoke; and various putative risk factors. Unique mutational profiles at the tumor level, including a higher prevalence of EGFR variations among Asian populations, highlight the importance of tumor genomic testing of newly diagnosed patients. Additional research is essential, given the high burden of disease among Asian American women who have never smoked and the limited knowledge regarding contributing risk factors specific to Asian American women, because the risk factors identified in Asian people living in Asia may not apply.

Accurate mediastinal staging is essential for determining the extent of lung cancer, predicting prognosis, and guiding treatment strategies. Current clinical guidelines recommend preoperative invasive mediastinal staging for most patients with potentially resectable lung cancer, as imaging modalities alone often lack sensitivity and specificity. Invasive mediastinal staging techniques are categorized into surgical (e.g., cervical mediastinoscopy, video-assisted thoracic surgery) and nonsurgical (i.e., minimally invasive) approaches. Although cervical mediastinoscopy has historically been the gold standard, minimally invasive techniques have gained prominence in recent decades. These approaches, including endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), and combined EBUS/EUS, provide improved accuracy and reduced morbidity compared with traditional surgical methods. EBUS-TBNA facilitates access to a broad range of lymph node stations with real-time ultrasound guidance, while EUS-FNA complements EBUS by enabling transesophageal lymph node sampling. Together, these techniques enable a more comprehensive mediastinal staging. This review examines five key trials that explore the expanding role of endobronchial and endoscopic techniques in mediastinal staging for non-small cell lung cancer, demonstrating how these advancements have transformed the diagnostic landscape.

The Permanente Journal advances knowledge in scientific research, clinical medicine, and innovative health care delivery. The Permanente Journal is owned and published by The Permanente Press, an entity of the Permanente Medical Groups. The Permanente Press publishes The Permanente Journal and books related to health care and Kaiser Permanente. The Permanente Journal is archived in PubMed Central.

Progel Pleural Air Leak Sealant (CR Bard, Warwick, RI) is a US Food and Drug Administration-approved hydrogel designed for application to surgical staple lines to prevent air leak after lung surgery. This product has demonstrated efficacy in reducing intraoperative air leaks compared with standard air leak closure methods. However, the impact on chest tube duration and length of hospital stay has not been reported. To evaluate the effect on rates of postoperative air leak, chest tube duration, and hospital stay in surgical patients with and without use of Progel. Retrospective study of 176 patients aged 18 to 80 years who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resections between 2014 and 2016. Eighty-four (48%) cases using Progel were included, as well as a representative sample of non-Progel cases (n = 92; 52%). Presence of postoperative lung air leak. No difference existed between the Progel and non-Progel groups in the rate of postoperative air leak (20/84, 23.81% Progel; 16/92, 17.39% non-Progel; p = 0.33). The length of time patients had a chest tube was similar (23.5 vs 23 hours, p = 0.721), as was percentage of patients with a less than 2-day hospitalization (77.17% non-Progel vs 82.14% Progel, p = 0.414). Our results suggest that Progel, used routinely in patients undergoing nonanatomic lung resection, does not have a significant impact on postoperative air leak, chest tube duration, or length of hospital stay. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the utility of Progel in reducing postoperative complications after thoracoscopic wedge resection in those treated for air leak or in the reduction of postoperative air leak in high-risk patients.