Hugo Pena-Verdeal

Dr. Hugo Pena-Verdeal

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2016 in Clinical and Experimental Optometry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Hugo Pena-VerdealHugo Pena-Verdeal
Hugo Pena-Verdeal
CGCarlos García‐Resúa
Carlos García‐Resúa
LRLucía Ramos
Lucía Ramos
Eva Yebra-PimentelEva Yebra-Pimentel
Eva Yebra-Pimentel
MGMª Jesús Giráldez
Mª Jesús Giráldez
This study was designed to examine diurnal variations in tear film break-up time (BUT) and maximum blink interval (MBI) and to assess two different ways of calculating these variables on video recordings of the BUT test interpreted with the help of especially designed software. The repeatability of interpreting BUT video recordings was also addressed. Twenty-six healthy young adults were enrolled after ruling out dry eye according to a battery of tests (ocular surface disease index, McMonnies questionnaire, Schirmer test, phenol red test and corneal staining). BUT and maximum blink interval were determined on video-recordings of the BUT test conducted over a day in four sessions (9.30 am, 12.30 pm, 3.30 pm and 6.30 pm). In each session, the test was repeated three times to give three videos in which three BUT and MBI values were obtained by a masked observer. BUT and MBI were determined by averaging the three measurements and by averaging only the two closest measurements. Finally, two further experienced observers re-examined the videos to assess the repeatability of the BUT measurements made. No diurnal variation in BUT was observed regardless of whether three or two video measurements were averaged. Significant correlation was detected between BUT and MBI. Inter-observer repeatability was better when BUT times were no longer than 15 seconds. Tear film BUT was not influenced by the time of day and moderate to strong correlation with MBI was observed in all four sessions. The software-assisted method proved useful and identified the need to clarify the BUT end-point and to limit the test to 15 seconds to improve observer repeatability.

1 December 2014 in Optometry and Vision Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CGCarlos García‐Resúa
Carlos García‐Resúa
Hugo Pena-VerdealHugo Pena-Verdeal
Hugo Pena-Verdeal
BRBeatriz Remeseiro
Beatriz Remeseiro
MFMaría Jesús Giráldez Fernández
María Jesús Giráldez Fernández
EYEva Yebra‐Pimentel
Eva Yebra‐Pimentel

1 August 2021 in Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Hugo Pena-VerdealHugo Pena-Verdeal
Hugo Pena-Verdeal
JGJacobo Garcia-Queiruga
Jacobo Garcia-Queiruga
CGCarlos García-Resúa
Carlos García-Resúa
EYEva Yebra-Pimentel
Eva Yebra-Pimentel
MGMaría J. Giráldez
María J. Giráldez

1 May 2013 in Clinical and Experimental Optometry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CGCarlos García‐Resúa
Carlos García‐Resúa
Hugo Pena-VerdealHugo Pena-Verdeal
Hugo Pena-Verdeal
MMMercedes Miñones
Mercedes Miñones
MGM Jesus Giraldez
M Jesus Giraldez
EYEva Yebra‐Pimentel
Eva Yebra‐Pimentel

1 December 2014 in Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CGCarlos García-Resúa
Carlos García-Resúa
Hugo Pena-VerdealHugo Pena-Verdeal
Hugo Pena-Verdeal
MMMercedes Miñones
Mercedes Miñones
MFMaría Jesús Giráldez Fernández
María Jesús Giráldez Fernández
EYEva Yebra-Pimentel
Eva Yebra-Pimentel

11 April 2022 in Clinical and Experimental Optometry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Hugo Pena-VerdealHugo Pena-Verdeal
Hugo Pena-Verdeal
CGCarlos Garcia-Resua
Carlos Garcia-Resua
Jacobo Garcia-QueirugaJacobo Garcia-Queiruga
Jacobo Garcia-Queiruga
Belen Sabucedo-VillamarinBelen Sabucedo-Villamarin
Belen Sabucedo-Villamarin
Eva Yebra-PimentelEva Yebra-Pimentel
Eva Yebra-Pimentel
MFMaría Jesús Giráldez Fernández
María Jesús Giráldez Fernández
The measurement of tear film osmolarity has been suggested as a gold standard in the diagnosis of dry eye. Many tear film physiological variables oscillate during the day. This review summarises current clinical knowledge regarding diurnal osmolarity variation in the tear film. A critical analysis is presented in respect of of sample size and characteristics, differences in the diurnal osmolarity variation on healthy versus altered tear film conditions or environment, and time of day and number of measurements undertaken. A comparison of 21 studies was made for studies in which one of the main objectives was to analyse the variance of tear film osmolarity at different time-points in a day on human cohorts. Tear film osmolarity appeard to be somewhat influenced by the time of day in healthy subjects and patients with ocular surface disease, or altered by environmental conditions. Both healthy and non-physiological tear film cohorts showed variations in results depending on the study: no variations during the day or statistically different values at some point in the day. These differences could be in the middle of the day or between the beginning and the end of the day, with higher values in the morning than in the afternoon, or even the opposite situation. The possibility of diurnal variations in tear film osmolarity should be considered by the clinician since the time of day when the tear film measurements are made can be critical in making the right diagnosis. Future studies in the diurnal variation field may have to use a well-established range of measurement time-points and a larger group of healthy subjects and and subjects who have a tear film altered by pathological or environmental conditions.