31 May 2023 in Nursing Open
FBFaustino Jerome G. Babate
Faustino Jerome G. Babate
Background: Touch is an integral part of human interaction. Health care makes significant use of touch, and for most healthcare professionals, it is indispensable to their practice. An essential and inevitable facet of the nursing profession is the touching of patients during the provision of care. Unfortunately, touch is seldom considered in the nursing framework today.Aims: To emphasize the importance of touch in contemporary nursing practice in a highly technological environment.Materials and methods: A search was conducted on February–May 2022. The initial search identified 84 articles and the final analysis included 38 articles that met the inclusion criteria (touch; touch in health care; touch and nursing; touch and technology; nursing and technology; nursing and caring; touch and caring).Results: The nurses' touch will always be an irreplaceable component of caring in nursing.Discussion: There can be no substitute to the expressive touch of a nurse. As the technological revolution in nursing is inevitable, it is imperative that nurses consider how much these technologies impact the nurse–patient relationships.Conclusion: The study emphasized the importance of touch in contemporary nursing practice. The study found that the nurses' touch will always be an irreplaceable component of caring in nursing. The finding will have an impact on nurses and patients situated in highly technological healthcare environments.
1 February 2021 in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences
This study investigates the differences between nursing students' surface and deep approaches to learning across their demographic profiles. Further, this study explores the association between the participants’ ages, year levels, and learning approaches. From December 2019 to February 2020, we used a quantitative-comparative- correlational study design at the University of Hail KSA. A survey-based questionnaire was used to collect data from 349 randomly selected nursing students. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-tests were used to examine the difference between the surface learning and the deep learning approaches of the participants across their profiles. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between participants' learning approaches, ages, and year levels. A significant difference in the deep learning approach was noted for age (F (3, 345) = 35.71; p = 0.01] and program type (bridging/regular) [t (347) = −8.81, p = 0.01]. A moderately positive significant correlation was found between age and both deep (r = 0.47, n = 349, p = 0.01) and surface (r = 0.45, n = 349, p = 0.01) learning approaches. This study shows that nursing students use both surface and deep learning approaches alike and are able to capitalise on either learning style. Both learning approaches are important and valuable in nursing education. The age of the student is correlated with the learning approach. Older students have higher scores for both deep and surface learning approaches. Academia must develop creative learning environments that can encourage students to use both approaches and to advance the transition to deep learning.