Muhammad Yousaf

Mr. Muhammad Yousaf

Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Islamabad, Islāmābād, Pakistan
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 February 2022 in International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MYMuhammad Yousaf
Muhammad Yousaf
AMAsif Mahmood
Asif Mahmood
AEAli Elkamel
Ali Elkamel
MRMuhammad Rizwan
Muhammad Rizwan
MZMuhammad Zaman
Muhammad Zaman

27 September 2022 in Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YMYusra Muazzam
Yusra Muazzam
MYMuhammad Yousaf
Muhammad Yousaf
MZMuhammad Zaman
Muhammad Zaman
Ali ElkamelAli Elkamel
Ali Elkamel
AMAsif Mahmood
Asif Mahmood
MAMuhammad Adnan
Muhammad Adnan
Carbon capture and utilization is an attractive technique to mitigate the damage to the environment. The aim of this study was to techno-economically investigate the hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol and then conversion of methanol to dimethyl ether using Aspen Plus® (V.11, Aspen Technology, Inc., Bedford, Massachusetts 01730, USA). Hydrogen was obtained from alkaline water electrolysis, proton exchange membrane and solid oxide electrolysis processes for methanol production. The major cost contributing factor in the methanol production was the cost of hydrogen production; therefore, the cost per ton of methanol was highest for alkaline water electrolysis and lowest for solid oxide electrolysis. The specific cost of methanol for solid oxide electrolysis, proton exchange membrane and alkaline water electrolysis was estimated to be 701 $/ton, 760 $/ton and 920 $/ton, respectively. Similarly, the specific cost of dimethyl ether was estimated to be 1141 $/ton, 1230 $/ton and 1471 $/ton, using solid oxide electrolysis, proton exchange membrane and alkaline water electrolysis based hydrogen production, respectively. The cost for methanol and dimethyl ether production by proton exchange membrane was slightly higher than for the solid oxide electrolysis process. However, the proton exchange membrane operates at a lower temperature, consequently leading to less operational issues.