Farah Asif

Dr. Farah Asif


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2018 in Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FAFarah Asif
Farah Asif
MBMaría Brotons
María Brotons
FBFrancesc Xavier Bosch
Francesc Xavier Bosch
LBLaia Bruni
Laia Bruni

1 January 2022 in Preventive Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FAFarah Asif
Farah Asif
RIR. Ibáñez
R. Ibáñez
CRC. Robles
C. Robles
PPP. Peremiquel-Trillas
P. Peremiquel-Trillas
SSS. de Sanjosé
S. de Sanjosé
LBL. Bruni
L. Bruni
An increasing body of evidence supports the validity of self-sampling as an alternative to clinician collection for primary Human Papillomavirus (HPV) screening. Self-sampling effectively reaches underscreened women and can be a powerful strategy in low- and high-resource settings for all target ages. This work aims to summarize the current use of HPV self-sampling worldwide. It is part of a larger project that describes cervical cancer screening programmes and produces standardized coverage estimates worldwide. A systematic review of the literature and official documents supplemented with a formal World Health Organisation country consultation was conducted. Findings show that the global use of HPV self-sampling is still limited. Only 17 (12%) of countries with identified screening programs recommend its use, nine as the primary collection method, and eight to reach underscreened populations. We identified 10 pilots evaluating the switch to self-sampling in well-established screening programs. The global use of self-sampling is likely to increase in the coming years. COVID-19's pandemic has prompted efforts to accelerate HPV self-sampling introduction globally, and it is now considered a key element in scaling up screening coverage. The information generated by the early experiences can be beneficial for decision-making in both new and existing programs.

29 December 2012 in Infectious Agents and Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FAFarah Asif
Farah Asif
LALaia Alemany
Laia Alemany
Sara TousSara Tous
Sara Tous
LBLaia Bruni
Laia Bruni
GCGary M Clifford
Gary M Clifford
SSSilvia De Sanjosé
Silvia De Sanjosé
Background: Information on human papillomavirus (HPV) type distribution is necessary to evaluate the potential impact of current and future HPV vaccines. We estimated the relative contribution (RC) to invasive cervical cancer (ICC) and precancerous cervical lesions of the nine HPV types (HPV 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58) included in an HPV vaccine currently under development. Methods: Estimations on ICC were based on an international study of 8,977 HPV positive cases and estimations on precancerous cervical lesions were extracted from a published meta-analysis including 115,789 HPV positive women. Globocan 2008 and 2010 World Population Prospects were used to estimate current and future projections of new ICC cases. Results: RC of the 9 HPV types in ICC was 89.4%, with 18.5% of cases positive for HPV 31/33/45/52/58. Regional variations were observed. RCs varied by histology, ranging between 89.1% in squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) and 95.5% in adenocarcinomas (ADC). HPV 16/18/45 were detected in 94.2% of ADC. RC of the 9 types altogether decreased with age (trend test p < 0.0001), driven by the decrease in older ages of HPV 16/18/45. In contrast, the RC of HPV 31/33/52/58 increased with age. Due to population growth alone, projected estimates of ICC cases attributable to the 9 types are expected to rise from 493,770 new cases in 2012 to 560,887 new cases in 2025. The RCs of individual high risk HPV types varied by cytological and histological grades of HPV-positive precancerous cervical lesions, and there was an under representation of HPV 18 and 45 compared to ICC. Conclusions: The addition of HPV 31/33/45/52/58 to HPV types included in current vaccines could prevent almost 90% of ICC cases worldwide. If the nine-valent vaccine achieves the same degree of efficacy than previous vaccines, world incidence rates could be substantially reduced.

1 September 2015 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FAFarah Asif
Farah Asif
SSSilvia De Sanjosé
Silvia De Sanjosé
Sara TousSara Tous
Sara Tous
BQBeatriz Quiros
Beatriz Quiros
NMNubia Muñoz
Nubia Muñoz
LALaia Alemany
Laia Alemany

1 November 2012 in Vaccine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMark A. Kane
Mark A. Kane
FAFarah Asif
Farah Asif
SSSilvia de Sanjosé
Silvia de Sanjosé
SWScott Wittet
Scott Wittet

1 June 2012 in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MLMiguel Lanaspa
Miguel Lanaspa
CMCinta Moraleda
Cinta Moraleda
SMSónia Machevo
Sónia Machevo
Raquel GonzalezRaquel Gonzalez
Raquel Gonzalez
FAFarah Asif
Farah Asif
QBQuique Bassat
Quique Bassat
The combination of fosmidomycin and clindamycin (F/C) is effective in adults and older children for the treatment of malaria and could be an important alternative to existing artemisinin-based combinations (ACTs) if proven to work in younger children. We conducted an open-label clinical trial to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of F/C for the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in Mozambican children <3 years of age. Aqueous solutions of the drugs were given for 3 days, and the children were followed up for 28 days. The primary outcome was the PCR-corrected adequate clinical and parasitological response at day 28. Secondary outcomes included day 7 and 28 uncorrected cure rates and fever (FCT) and parasite (PCT) clearance times. Fifty-two children were recruited, but only 37 patients were evaluable for the primary outcome. Day 7 cure rates were high (94.6%; 35/37), but the day 28 PCR-corrected cure rate was 45.9% (17/37). The FCT was short (median, 12 h), but the PCT was longer (median, 72 h) than in previous studies. Tolerability was good, and most common adverse events were related to the recurrence of malaria. The poor efficacy observed for the F/C combination may be a consequence of the new formulations used, differential bioavailability in younger children, naturally occurring variations in parasite sensitivity to the drugs, or an insufficient enhancement of their effects by naturally acquired immunity in young children. Additional studies should be conducted to respond to the many uncertainties arising from this trial, which should not discourage further evaluation of this promising combination.