Mounika Polavarapu

Dr. Mounika Polavarapu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
MPMounika Polavarapu
Mounika Polavarapu
HKHillary Klonoff-Cohen
Hillary Klonoff-Cohen
DJDivya Joshi
Divya Joshi
PKPraveen Kumar
Praveen Kumar
RARuopeng An
Ruopeng An
KRKarin Rosenblatt
Karin Rosenblatt
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is the third leading cause of death among infants younger than one year of age. Effective SIDS prediction models have yet to be developed. Hence, we developed a risk score for SIDS, testing contemporary factors including infant exposure to passive smoke, circumcision, and sleep position along with known risk factors based on 291 SIDS and 242 healthy control infants. The data were retrieved from death certificates, parent interviews, and medical records collected between 1989–1992, prior to the Back to Sleep Campaign. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed to develop a risk score model. Our finalized risk score model included: (i) breastfeeding duration (OR = 13.85, p < 0.001); (ii) family history of SIDS (OR = 4.31, p < 0.001); (iii) low birth weight (OR = 2.74, p = 0.003); (iv) exposure to passive smoking (OR = 2.64, p < 0.001); (v) maternal anemia during pregnancy (OR = 2.07, p = 0.03); and (vi) maternal age <25 years (OR = 1.77, p = 0.01). The area under the curve for the overall model was 0.79, and the sensitivity and specificity were 79% and 63%, respectively. Once this risk score is further validated it could ultimately help physicians identify the high risk infants and counsel parents about modifiable risk factors that are most predictive of SIDS.

17 September 2024 in Women's Health Issues
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MPMounika Polavarapu
Mounika Polavarapu
SSShipra Singh
Shipra Singh
CACamelia Arsene
Camelia Arsene
RSRachel Stanton
Rachel Stanton
Adequate prenatal care is vital for positive maternal, fetal, and child health outcomes; however, differences in prenatal care utilization exist, particularly among rural populations. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telehealth in prenatal care, but its impact on the adequacy of care remains unclear. Using Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) data, this study examined prenatal care adequacy during the early-pandemic year (2020) and pre-pandemic years (2016-2019) and investigated rural-urban inequities. Logistic regression models assessed the association between the pandemic year and prenatal care adequacy, and considered barriers to virtual care as a covariate. The sample consisted of 163,758 respondents in 2016-2019 and 42,314 respondents in 2020. Overall, the study participants were 12% less likely to receive adequate prenatal visits during the early-pandemic year (2020) compared with 2016-2019 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.86, 0.91]). Respondents in rural areas had lower odds of receiving adequate prenatal care compared with those in urban areas during both pre-pandemic years (aOR = 0.90; 95% CI [0.88, 0.93]) and the early-pandemic year (aOR = 0.94; 95% CI [0.88, 0.99]). However, after adjusting for barriers to virtual care, the difference between rural and urban areas in the early-pandemic year became nonsignificant (aOR = 0.93; 95% CI [0.78, 1.11]). Barriers to virtual care, including lack of phones, data, computers, internet access, and private space, were significantly associated with inadequate prenatal care. During the early-pandemic year, PRAMS respondents experienced reduced adequacy of prenatal care. Although rural-urban inequities persisted, our results suggest that existing barriers to virtual care explained these inequities. Telehealth interventions that minimize these barriers could potentially enhance health care utilization among pregnant people.

15 September 2020 in Pediatric Pulmonology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MPMounika Polavarapu
Mounika Polavarapu
HKHillary Klonoff‐Cohen
Hillary Klonoff‐Cohen

24 May 2024 in Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MPMounika Polavarapu
Mounika Polavarapu
DODorian S. Odems
Dorian S. Odems
SBSativa Banks
Sativa Banks
SSShipra Singh
Shipra Singh
Introduction: In the United States, 1 in 6 women reports obstetric violence in the form of physical and verbal abuse, coercion, and lack of informed consent. Despite recommendations against routine episiotomy, its use in the United States remains notable and varies considerably. This study aimed to analyze the various forms of obstetric violence associated with undergoing an episiotomy and having a choice in undergoing an episiotomy. Methods: Data from the cross‐sectional Listening to Mothers in California survey were analyzed using weighted sample. Logistic regression models were conducted to compute adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs for undergoing episiotomy and having a choice in it. Results: Overall, 21% of the respondents reported undergoing an episiotomy, and 75% of them reported not having a choice in undergoing this procedure. After adjusting for covariates, feeling pressured to induce labor (aOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.28‐1.35) and to use an epidural analgesia (aOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.77‐1.88) increased the odds of undergoing an episiotomy. Having a midwife during childbirth significantly reduced the odds of an episiotomy. Respondents who indicated being handled roughly by health care providers were 95% less likely to have a choice in receiving an episiotomy (aOR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.04‐0.06). Discussion: This is the first study to examine other forms of obstetric violence as correlates of episiotomy and having a choice in it. Standardized institutional measures against obstetric violence, patients’ ability to make autonomous decisions through informed consent, and engaging midwives could decrease medically unnecessary labor procedures and associated complications.

5 March 2024 in Maternal and Child Health Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMounika Polavarapu
Mounika Polavarapu
TBTopista N. Barasa
Topista N. Barasa
SSShipra Singh
Shipra Singh
MOMatthew M. Orbain
Matthew M. Orbain
SISafa Ibrahim
Safa Ibrahim
Background: Ohio ranks 43rd in the nation in infant mortality rates (IMR); with IMR among non-Hispanic black infants is three times higher than white infants. Objective: To identify the social factors determining the vulnerability of Ohio counties to IMR and visualize the spatial association between relative social vulnerability and IMR at county and census tract levels. Methods: The social vulnerability index (SVICDC) is a measure of the relative social vulnerability of a geographic unit. Five out of 15 social variables in the SVICDC were utilized to create a customized index for IMR (SVIIMR) in Ohio. The bivariate descriptive maps and spatial lag model were applied to visualize the quantitative relationship between SVIIMR and IMR, accounting for the spatial autocorrelation in the data. Results: Southeastern counties in Ohio displayed highest IMRs and highest overall SVIIMR; specifically, highest vulnerability to poverty, no high school diploma, and mobile housing. In contrast, extreme northwestern counties exhibited high IMRs but lower overall SVIIMR. Spatial regression showed five clusters where vulnerability to low per capita income in one county significantly impacted IMR (p = 0.001) in the neighboring counties within each cluster. At the census tract-level within Lucas county, the Toledo city area (compared to the remaining county) had higher overlap between high IMR and SVIIMR. Conclusion: The application of SVI using geospatial techniques could identify priority areas, where social factors are increasing the vulnerability to infant mortality rates, for potential interventions that could reduce disparities through strategic and equitable policies.

8 March 2025 in Medical Science Educator
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSShipra Singh
Shipra Singh
MPMounika Polavarapu
Mounika Polavarapu
CACamelia Arsene
Camelia Arsene
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic presented unprecedented challenges not only to the healthcare system, but also to the medical education curricula. Institutions implemented policies regarding educational experiences for medical students in observance of the ever-changing pandemic and quarantine requirements. Additionally, medical students experienced significant stressors related to the pandemic that tested their resilience, which is the ability to bounce back when faced with adversity. Method: This cross-sectional study explored the independent relationship of pandemic-related stress and educational experience with burnout and compassion satisfaction. In addition, it also investigated the relationship of both actions-related resilience and beliefs-related resilience on burnout and compassion satisfaction. Study participants were students (N = 145) enrolled in a mid-western medical school during the academic year of 2020 and 2021. STATA/SE version18 was used to conduct descriptive and multivariable linear regression model statistics. Results: Results showed that among medical students, pandemic-related stress was a significant predictor of burnout (b = 0.31; SE = 0.05; p < 0.001), while a good educational experience was protective (b = − 0.28; SE = 0.05; p < 0.001). However, resilience had no significant association with burnout. A positive educational experience was also significantly associated with higher levels of compassion satisfaction (b = 0.34; SE; p < 0.001) among the medical students. Total resilience (b = 0.44; p < 0.05) and actions-related resilience (b = 0.69; p < 0.05) independently showed a significant association with compassion satisfaction. Conclusion: Multi-dimensional interventions, including individual-level and institutional-level support, benefit individual health professionals but can also contribute to a more resilient and sustainable healthcare system capable to meeting the demands of any critical health crisis.