Early reports have demonstrated an association of COVID-19 infection during pregnancy and postpartum period with coagulopathy and bleeding complications and indicated that pregnant people with COVID-19 are more likely to experience coagulopathy and venous thromboembolism. A recent report concerning such complications during the first wave of the pandemic was reassuring; however, no publications have evaluated these issues in the context of increased illness severity with the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. We performed a retrospective, multinational cohort study in Canada, Romania, and the United Kingdom, aiming to provide a comprehensive analysis of the hematologic test characteristics of pregnancies affected by COVID-19 after the first wave of the pandemic. Three-hundred-seventy patients were evaluated. Markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction were significantly elevated, in keeping with observations in the nonpregnant population. Reassuringly, despite more severe disease noted in succeeding waves of the pandemic, there was no significant evidence of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy, and overall, no association was demonstrated between isolated coagulation abnormalities and bleeding risk. Notably, fibrinogen below 2g/L was again linked with the risk of postpartum hemorrhage. Finally, venous thromboembolism risk was low but noted more frequently in those with severe illness despite thromboprophylaxis. Our findings add valuable insights into the nature of hematologic test characteristics, bleeding, and thrombotic complications for those affected with COVID-19 in pregnancy, reassuring readers of the low incidence of bleeding and thrombotic complications but inviting further debate as to the degree of thromboprophylaxis that may benefit the subgroup with severe disease.

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most frequent predictors of obstetric outcome among Romanian pregnant women. Thus, we aimed to investigate the role of rs7903146 (C/T) TCF7L2 gene polymorphism in the presence of GDM and to evaluate the influence on maternal-fetal outcomes in a cohort of pregnant women from Northern Transylvania. Our prospective case–control study was performed in a tertiary maternity center on 61 patients diagnosed with GDM and 55 normal pregnant patients. The patients were genotyped for rs7903146 (C/T) polymorphism of the TCF7L2 gene using the PCR-RFLP method between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation. The minor T allele was associated with a high risk of developing GDM (OR 1.71 [95% CI 0.82–3.59]) if both heterozygote and homozygote types were considered. Also, a higher risk of developing GDM was observed in homozygous carriers (OR 3.26 [95% CI 1.10–9.68]). Women with the TT genotype were more likely to require insulin therapy during pregnancy than other genotypes with a 5.67-fold increased risk ([1.61–19.97], p = 0.015). TT homozygote type was significantly associated with fetal macrosomia for birth weights greater than the 95th percentile (p = 0.034). The homozygous TT genotype is associated with an increased risk of developing GDM. Also, rs7903146 (C/T) TCF7L2 variant is accompanied by a high probability of developing insulin-dependent gestational diabetes mellitus (ID-GDM). The presence of at least one minor T allele was associated with a higher risk of fetal macrosomia.

Backgroundand Objectives: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a pregnancy-associated pathology commonly resulting in macrosomic fetuses, a known culprit of obstetric complications. We aimed to evaluate the potential of umbilical cord biometry and fetal abdominal skinfold assessment as screening tools for fetal macrosomia in gestational diabetes mellitus pregnant women. Materials and methods: This was a prospective case–control study conducted on pregnant patients presenting at 24–28 weeks of gestation in a tertiary-level maternity hospital in Northern Romania. Fetal biometry, fetal weight estimation, umbilical cord area and circumference, areas of the umbilical vein and arteries, Wharton jelly (WJ) area and abdominal fold thickness measurements were performed. Results: A total of 51 patients were enrolled in the study, 26 patients in the GDM group and 25 patients in the non-GDM group. There was no evidence in favor of umbilical cord area and WJ amount assessments as predictors of fetal macrosomia (p > 0.05). However, there was a statistically significant difference in the abdominal skinfold measurement during the second trimester between macrosomic and normal-weight newborns in the GDM patient group (p = 0.016). The second-trimester abdominal circumference was statistically significantly correlated with fetal macrosomia at term in the GDM patient group with a p value of 0.003, as well as when considering the global prevalence of macrosomia in the studied populations, 0.001, when considering both populations. Conclusions: The measurements of cord and WJ could not be established as predictors of fetal macrosomia in our study populations, nor differentiate between pregnancies with and without GDM. Abdominal skinfold measurement and abdominal circumference measured during the second trimester may be important markers of fetal metabolic status in pregnancies complicated by GDM.