Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (CNL) are lysosomal storage diseases that represent the most common cause of dementia in children. To date, 13 autosomal recessive (AR) and 1 autosomal dominant (AD) gene have been characterized. Biallelic variants in MFSD8 cause CLN7 type, with nearly 50 pathogenic variants, mainly truncating and missense, reported so far. Splice site variants require functional validation. We detected a novel homozygous non-canonical splice-site variant in MFSD8 in a 5-year-old girl who presented with progressive neurocognitive impairment and microcephaly. The diagnostic procedure was elicited by clinical genetics first, and then confirmed by cDNA sequencing and brain imaging. Inferred by the common geographic origin of the parents, an autosomal recessive inheritance was hypothesized, and SNP-array was performed as the first-line genetic test. Only three AR genes lying within the observed 24 Mb regions of homozygosity were consistent with the clinical phenotype, including EXOSC9, SPATA5 and MFSD8. The cerebral and cerebellar atrophy detected in the meantime by MRI, along with the suspicion of accumulation of ceroid lipopigment in neurons, prompted us to perform targeted MFSD8 sequencing. Following the detection of a splice site variant of uncertain significance, skipping of exon 8 was demonstrated by cDNA sequencing, and the variant was redefined as pathogenic.

Background/Objectives: The failure of physiological left-right (LR) patterning, a critical embryological process responsible for establishing the asymmetric positioning of internal organs, leads to a spectrum of congenital abnormalities characterized by laterality defects, collectively known as “heterotaxy”. MMP21 biallelic variants have recently been associated with heterotaxy syndrome and congenital heart defects (CHD). However, the genotype–phenotype correlations and the underlying pathogenic mechanisms remain poorly understood. Methods: Patients harboring biallelic MMP21 missense variants who underwent diagnostic genetic testing for CHD or heterotaxy were recruited at the Institute for Maternal and Child Health—I.R.C.C.S. “Burlo Garofolo”. Additionally, a literature review on MMP21 missense variants was conducted, and clinical data from reported patients, along with molecular data from in silico and modeling tools, were collected. Results: A total of 18 MMP21 missense variants were reported in 26 patients, with the majority exhibiting CHD (94%) and variable extra-cardiac manifestations (64%). In our cohort, through Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) analysis, the missense p.(Met301Ile) variant was identified in two unrelated patients, who both presented with heterotaxy syndrome. Conclusions: Our comprehensive analysis of MMP21 missense variants supports the pathogenic role of the p.(Met301Ile) variant and provides significant insights into the disease pathogenesis. Specifically, missense variants are distributed throughout the gene without clustering in specific regions, and phenotype comparisons between patients carrying missense variants in compound heterozygosity or homozygosity do not reveal significant differences. These findings may suggest a potential loss-of-function mechanism for MMP21 missense variants, especially those located in the catalytic domain, and highlight their critical role in the pathogenesis of heterotaxy syndrome.

We describe the complex case of a 44-year-old man with polycystic kidney disease, mild cognitive impairment, and tremors in the upper limbs. Brain MRI showed lesions compatible with leukodystrophy. The diagnostic process, which included clinical exome sequencing (CES) and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), revealed a triple diagnosis: autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) due to a pathogenic variant, c.2152C>T-p.(Gln718Ter), in the PKD1 gene; late-onset phenylketonuria due to the presence of two missense variants, c.842C>T-p.(Pro281Leu) and c.143T>C-p.(Leu48Ser) in the PAH gene; and a 915 Kb duplication on chromosome 15. Few patients with multiple concurrent genetic diagnoses are reported in the literature; in this ADPKD patient, genome-wide analysis allowed for the diagnosis of adult-onset phenylketonuria (which would have otherwise gone unnoticed) and a 15q11.2 duplication responsible for cognitive and behavioral impairment with incomplete penetrance. This case underlines the importance of clinical genetics for interpreting complex results obtained by genome-wide techniques, and for diagnosing concurrent late-onset monogenic conditions.

Background: North Carolina Macular Dystrophy (NCMD) is a non-progressive inherited macular dystrophy characterized by marked phenotypic variability. The genetic etiology of NCMD remains largely unknown, and only a limited number of families have been reported in Europe. Methods: We performed an in-depth investigation of an Italian family affected by NCMD using an integrated approach that combined SNP-array analysis, whole-exome sequencing, and long-read whole-genome sequencing. Additionally, we conducted a comprehensive review of NCMD-related literature. Results: We identified a novel 98 Kb duplication involving both PRDM13 and CCNC genes in a three-generation kindred, where the proband exhibited severe macular alterations, while all other affected family members presented with a milder clinical phenotype. A review of the literature suggests different genotype–phenotype correlations and similar penetrance for duplications and single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in described families. Specifically, smaller duplications may be associated with more severe phenotypes, while SNVs exhibit high phenotypic variability. Conclusions: In this study, we describe the first NCMD Italian family, in which the integration of second- and third-generation sequencing methods enabled the identification of a novel pathogenic PRDM13 and CCNC duplication, thereby expanding the mutational spectrum of NCMD. Overall, these findings, together with the literature review, highlight the importance of selecting appropriate genetic testing approaches that allow the detection of non-coding variants and CNVs and thus enable accurate diagnosis and effective clinical management of patients and their families.

Background: In the development of breast cancer and ovarian cancer there may be an influence of lifestyle and environmental factors. This influence could be relevant also in patients with genetic predisposition such as in carriers of germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA genes. However, this issue has been addressed in only a few studies so far. Methods: In this retrospective, multicenter case-control study, we enrolled participants with a pathogenic variant BRCA gene and divided into 2 groups: group 1, patients with breast cancer and/or ovarian cancer, and group 2, subjects without cancer. We compared these groups regarding demographic data as age, body mass index, smoking habits, estroprogestinic use, Mediterranean diet, and physical activity. Multivariable analyses were used to identify predisposing factors. All evaluations were 2-tailed and considered statistically significant if the P value was less than .05. Results: We enrolled 281 participants, 135 (79.4%) with breast cancer, 32 (18.8%) with ovarian cancer, 3 (1.8%) with both, and 111 unaffected (39.5%) women. Independent risk factors associated with cancer were age (P < .0001); body mass index (P = .007); family history (P = .002); occupation (P = .003); smoking habits (P = .012), number of cigarettes smoked (P = .016), and pack-year index (P = .022); and estroprogestinic use (P = .032) and years of estroprogestinic use (P = .029). At multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.062; P < .0001), family history (OR = 0.129; P = .001), number of cigarettes smoked (P = .014), and estroprogestinic use (OR = 2.009; P = .025) were statistically significant risk factors associated with cancer development. Conclusions: In the development of breast cancer and ovarian cancer, lifestyle and environmental factors seem to play a statistically significant role in the presence of genetic predisposition associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations.

Thank you for sharing the comment