Zhen-Shun Cheng

Dr. Zhen-Shun Cheng


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 March 2020 in medRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
CCChang Chen
Chang Chen
YZYi Zhang
Yi Zhang
JHJianying Huang
Jianying Huang
PYPing Yin
Ping Yin
ZCZhen-Shun Cheng
Zhen-Shun Cheng
XWXinghuan Wang
Xinghuan Wang
Background: No clinically proven effective antiviral strategy exists for the epidemic Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label multicenter trial involving adult patients with COVID-19. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive conventional therapy plus Umifenovir (Arbidol) (200mg*3/day) or Favipiravir (1600mg*2/first day followed by 600mg*2/day) for 10 days. The primary outcome was clinical recovery rate of Day 7. Latency to relief for pyrexia and cough, the rate of auxiliary oxygen therapy (AOT) or noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NMV) were the secondary outcomes. Safety data were collected for 17 days. Results: 240 enrolled COVID-19 patients underwent randomization; 120 patients were assigned to receive Favipiravir (116 assessed), and 120 to receive Arbidol (120 assessed). Clinical recovery rate of Day 7 does not significantly differ between Favipiravir group (71/116) and Arbidol group (62/120) (P=0.1396, difference of recovery rate: 0.0954; 95% CI: -0.0305 to 0.2213). Favipiravir led to shorter latencies to relief for both pyrexia (difference: 1.70 days, P<0.0001) and cough (difference: 1.75 days, P0.05). The most frequently observed Favipiravir-associated adverse event was raised serum uric acid (16/116, OR: 5.52, P=0.0014). Conclusions: Among patients with COVID-19, Favipiravir, compared to Arbidol, did not significantly improve the clinically recovery rate at Day 7. Favipiravir significantly improved the latency to relief for pyrexia and cough. Adverse effects caused Favipiravir are mild and manageable. This trial is registered with Chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2000030254).

6 December 2021 in Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJin-Lan Zhang
Jin-Lan Zhang
YLYu-Huan Li
Yu-Huan Li
LWLu-Lu Wang
Lu-Lu Wang
HLHong-Qi Liu
Hong-Qi Liu
SLShuai-Yao Lu
Shuai-Yao Lu
JJJian-dong Jiang
Jian-dong Jiang
Azvudine (FNC) is a nucleoside analog that inhibits HIV-1 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). Recently, we discovered FNC an agent against SARS-CoV-2, and have taken it into Phase III trial for COVID-19 patients. FNC monophosphate analog inhibited SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-OC43 coronavirus with an EC50 between 1.2 and 4.3 μM, depending on viruses or cells, and selective index (SI) in 15–83 range. Oral administration of FNC in rats revealed a substantial thymus-homing feature, with FNC triphosphate (the active form) concentrated in the thymus and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Treating SARS-CoV-2 infected rhesus macaques with FNC (0.07 mg/kg, qd, orally) reduced viral load, recuperated the thymus, improved lymphocyte profiles, alleviated inflammation and organ damage, and lessened ground-glass opacities in chest X-ray. Single-cell sequencing suggested the promotion of thymus function by FNC. A randomized, single-arm clinical trial of FNC on compassionate use (n = 31) showed that oral FNC (5 mg, qd) cured all COVID-19 patients, with 100% viral ribonucleic acid negative conversion in 3.29 ± 2.22 days (range: 1–9 days) and 100% hospital discharge rate in 9.00 ± 4.93 days (range: 2–25 days). The side-effect of FNC is minor and transient dizziness and nausea in 16.12% (5/31) patients. Thus, FNC might cure COVID-19 through its anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity concentrated in the thymus, followed by promoted immunity.

4 December 2022 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJing Luo
Jing Luo
JWJin Wang
Jin Wang
JZJing Zhang
Jing Zhang
ASAming Sang
Aming Sang
XYXujun Ye
Xujun Ye
XLXinyi Li
Xinyi Li
The balance between M1 and M2 macrophage polarization is involved in the regulation of pulmonary inflammation. Nuclear factor erythroid-derived 2-like 2 (Nfe2l2, also known as Nrf2), a nuclear transcription factor, is reported to play protective roles in acute lung injury (ALI) and inflammation, and increasing evidence indicates that the protective effects of Nrf2 are closely related to autophagy. This study aimed to explore whether Nrf2 is involved in sepsis-induced acute pulmonary injury and inflammation and in the role of macrophage polarization in the process. In the present study, sepsis patients, an Nrf2 knockout mouse that underwent cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated macrophage cell lines were employed to investigate the potential functions of Nrf2 in sepsis-induced lung injury and the underlying mechanisms. Clinical studies showed that the NRF2 mRNA level was inversely correlated with pulmonary inflammation and disease severity in patients with sepsis. Analyses in a CLP-treated Nrf2 knockout mouse model indicated that an Nrf2 deficiency promoted a CLP-induced increase in M1 macrophage polarization and apoptosis and inhibited CLP-induced upregulation of the autophagy level in lung tissues. Experiments in RAW264.7 cells revealed that Nrf2 overexpression inhibited M1 macrophage polarization but promoted M2 macrophage polarization by improving the autophagy, and Nrf2 overexpression promoted PPARγ but inhibited NF-κB nuclear translocation. In conclusion, these results indicate that Nrf2 plays a protective role in sepsis-induced pulmonary injury and inflammation through the regulation of autophagy- and NF-κB/PPARγ-mediated macrophage polarization.

4 September 2020 in Military Medical Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YJYing-Hui Jin
Ying-Hui Jin
QZQing-Yuan Zhan
Qing-Yuan Zhan
ZPZhi-Yong Peng
Zhi-Yong Peng
XRXue-Qun Ren
Xue-Qun Ren
XYXun-Tao Yin
Xun-Tao Yin
XWXinghuan Wang
Xinghuan Wang
The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of a rapidly spreading illness, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), affecting more than seventeen million people around the world. Diagnosis and treatment guidelines for clinicians caring for patients are needed. In the early stage, we have issued “A rapid advice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infected pneumonia (standard version)”; now there are many direct evidences emerged and may change some of previous recommendations and it is ripe for develop an evidence-based guideline. We formed a working group of clinical experts and methodologists. The steering group members proposed 29 questions that are relevant to the management of COVID-19 covering the following areas: chemoprophylaxis, diagnosis, treatments, and discharge management. We searched the literature for direct evidence on the management of COVID-19, and assessed its certainty generated recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of ungraded consensus-based statement. Finally, we issued 34 statements. Among them, 6 were strong recommendations for, 14 were weak recommendations for, 3 were weak recommendations against and 11 were ungraded consensus-based statement. They covered topics of chemoprophylaxis (including agents and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) agents), diagnosis (including clinical manifestations, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), respiratory tract specimens, IgM and IgG antibody tests, chest computed tomography, chest x-ray, and CT features of asymptomatic infections), treatments (including lopinavir-ritonavir, umifenovir, favipiravir, interferon, remdesivir, combination of antiviral drugs, hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine, interleukin-6 inhibitors, interleukin-1 inhibitors, glucocorticoid, qingfei paidu decoction, lianhua qingwen granules/capsules, convalescent plasma, lung transplantation, invasive or noninvasive ventilation, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)), and discharge management (including discharge criteria and management plan in patients whose RT-PCR retesting shows SARS-CoV-2 positive after discharge). We also created two figures of these recommendations for the implementation purpose. We hope these recommendations can help support healthcare workers caring for COVID-19 patients.

19 August 2020 in Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JXJingen Xia
Jingen Xia
YZYi Zhang
Yi Zhang
LNLan Ni
Lan Ni
LCLei Chen
Lei Chen
CZChangzhi Zhou
Changzhi Zhou
QZQingyuan Zhan
Qingyuan Zhan
Objectives: An ongoing outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 is spreading globally. Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is the most common complication of coronavirus disease 2019. However, the clinical effectiveness of early high-flow nasal oxygen treatment in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure has not been explored. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of high-flow nasal oxygen treatment and to identify the variables predicting high-flow nasal oxygen treatment failure in coronavirus disease 2019 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Design: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Setting: Three tertiary hospitals in Wuhan, China. Patients: Forty-three confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 adult patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure treated with high-flow nasal oxygen. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Mean age of the enrolled patients was 63.0 ± 9.7 years; female patients accounted for 41.9%. High-flow nasal oxygen failure (defined as upgrading respiratory support to positive pressure ventilation or death) was observed in 20 patients (46.5%), of which 13 (30.2%) required endotracheal intubation. Patients with high-flow nasal oxygen success had a higher median oxygen saturation (96.0% vs 93.0%; p < 0.001) at admission than those with high-flow nasal oxygen failure. High-flow nasal oxygen failure was more likely in patients who were older (p = 0.030) and male (p = 0.037), had a significant increase in respiratory rate and a significant decrease in the ratio of oxygen saturation/Fio 2 to respiratory rate index within 3 days of high-flow nasal oxygen treatment. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis model, male and lower oxygen saturation at admission remained independent predictors of high-flow nasal oxygen failure. The hospital mortality rate of the cohort was 32.5%; however, the hospital mortality rate in patients with high-flow nasal oxygen failure was 65%. Conclusions: High-flow nasal oxygen may be effective for treating coronavirus disease 2019 patients with mild to moderate acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. However, high-flow nasal oxygen failure was associated with a poor prognosis. Male and lower oxygenation at admission were the two strong predictors of high-flow nasal oxygen failure.

27 February 2023 in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YWYun Wang
Yun Wang
HDHaifeng Duan
Haifeng Duan
JZJing Zhang
Jing Zhang
QWQingyuan Wang
Qingyuan Wang
TPTuo Peng
Tuo Peng
XLXinyi Li
Xinyi Li
Pollution from fine particulate matter (PM2.5) has become a major threat to public health and has been related to lung toxicity. One of the key regulators of the Hippo signaling system, Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1), is speculated to play a role in ferroptosis development. Here, we focused on investigating the function of YAP1 in pyroptosis and ferroptosis, aiming to explore its therapeutic potential in PM2.5-induced lung toxicity. PM2.5-induced lung toxicity was induced in Wild-type WT and conditional YAP1-knockout mice, and lung epithelial cells were stimulatd by PM2.5 in vitro. We used western blot, transmission electron microscopy, and fluorescence microscopy to investigate pyroptosis- and ferroptosis-related characteristics. We found that PM2.5 leads to lung toxicity using mechanisms involving pyroptosis and ferroptosis. YAP1 knockdown impeded pyroptosis, ferroptosis, and PM2.5-induced lung damage, as shown by increased histopathology, higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines, GSDMD protein, lipid peroxidation, and iron accumulation, as well as increased NLRP3 inflammasome activation and decreased SLC7A11 expression. YAP1 silencing consistently promoted NLRP3 inflammasome activation and reduced SLC7A11 levels, aggravating PM2.5-induced cellular damage. In contrast, YAP1-overexpressing cells inhibited NLRP3 inflammasome activation and increased SLC7A11 levels, preventing pyroptosis and ferroptosis. Overall, our data suggest that YAP1 ameliorates PM2.5-induced lung injury by inhibiting NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis and SL7A11-dependent ferroptosis.