Nanoparticles (NPs) are versatile candidates for nanomedical applications due to their unique physicochemical properties. However, their clinical applicability is hindered by their undesirable recognition by the immune system and the consequent immunotoxicity, as well as their rapid clearance in vivo. After injection, NPs are usually covered with layers of proteins, called protein coronas (PCs), which alter their identity, biodistribution, half-life, and efficacy. Therefore, the characterization of the PC is for in predicting the fate of NPs in vivo. The aim of this review was to summarize the state of the art regarding the intrinsic factors closely related to the NP structure, and extrinsic factors that govern PC formation in vitro. In addition, well-known opsonins, including complement, immunoglobulins, fibrinogen, and dysopsonins, such as histidine-rich glycoprotein, apolipoproteins, and albumin, are described in relation to their role in NP detection by immune cells. Particular emphasis is placed on their role in mediating the interaction of NPs with innate and adaptive immune cells. Finally, strategies to reduce PC formation are discussed in detail.

Cell therapy based on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells has represented a revolutionary new approach for treating tumors, especially hematological diseases. Complete remission rates (CRR) > 80%–97% and 50%–90% overall response rates (ORR) have been achieved with a treatment based on CAR‐T cells in patients with malignant B‐cell tumors that have relapsed or are refractory to previous treatments. Toxicity remains the major problem. Most patients treated with CAR‐T cells develop high‐grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell‐associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). However, the unprecedentedly high CRR and ORR have led to the approval of six CAR‐T cell therapeutics by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), prompting researchers to improve existing products and develop new ones. By now, around 1000 clinical trials based on CAR‐T cells are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: 82% are for hematological diseases, while the remaining 16% are for solid tumors. As a result of this increased research, an enormous amount of conflicting information has been accumulated in the literature, and each group follows its manufacturing protocols and performs specific in vitro testing. This review aimed to combine and compare clinical and preclinical information, highlighting the most used protocols to provide a comprehensive overview of the in vitro world of CAR‐T cells, from manufacturing to their characterization. The focus is on all steps of the CAR‐T cell manufacturing process, from the collection of patient or donor blood to the enrichment of T cells, their activation with anti‐CD3/CD28 beads, interleukin‐2 (IL‐2) or IL‐7 and IL‐15 (induction of a more functional memory phenotype), and their transfection (viral or non‐viral methods). Automation is crucial for ensuring a standardized final product.

Oligonucleotide (ON) therapeutics are molecular target agents composed of chemically synthesized DNA or RNA molecules capable of inhibiting gene expression or protein function. How ON therapeutics can efficiently reach the inside of target cells remains a problem still to be solved in the majority of potential clinical applications. The chemical structure of ON compounds could affect their capability to pass through the plasma membrane. Other key factors are nuclease degradation in the extracellular space, renal clearance, reticulo-endothelial system, and at the target cell level, the endolysosomal system and the possible export via exocytosis. Several delivery platforms have been proposed to overcome these limits including the use of lipidic, polymeric, and inorganic nanoparticles, or hybrids between them. The possibility of evaluating the efficacy of the proposed therapeutic strategies in useful in vivo models is still a pivotal need, and the employment of zebrafish (ZF) models could expand the range of possibilities. In this review, we briefly describe the main ON therapeutics proposed for anticancer treatment, and the different strategies employed for their delivery to cancer cells. The principal features of ZF models and the pros and cons of their employment in the development of ON-based therapeutic strategies are also discussed.

The use of zebrafish (ZF) embryos as an in vivo model is increasingly attractive thanks to different features that include easy handling, transparency, and the absence of adaptive immunity until 4–6 weeks. These factors allow the development of xenografts that can be easily analyzed through fluorescence techniques. In this work, ZF were exploited to characterize the efficiency of drug-loaded polymeric NPs as a therapeutical approach for B-cell malignancies. Fluorescent probes, fluorescent transgenic lines of ZF, or their combination allowed to deeply examine biodistribution, elimination, and therapeutic efficacy. In particular, the fluorescent signal of nanoparticles (NPs) was exploited to investigate the in vivo distribution, while the colocalization between the fluorescence in macrophages and NPs allows following the elimination pathway of these polymeric NPs. Xenotransplanted human B-cells (Nalm-6) developed a reproducible model useful for demonstrating drug delivery by polymeric NPs loaded with doxorubicin and, as a consequence, the arrest of tumor growth and the reduction in tumor burden. ZF proved to be a versatile model, able to rapidly provide answers in the development of animal models and in the characterization of the activity and the efficacy of drug delivery systems.