Nima Golijani-Moghaddam

Prof. Dr. Nima Golijani-Moghaddam

University of Lincoln, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2016 in Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFAshley W. Francis
Ashley W. Francis
DDDavid L. Dawson
David L. Dawson
NGNima Golijani-Moghaddam
Nima Golijani-Moghaddam

1 July 2020 in Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DDDavid L. Dawson
David L. Dawson
NGNima Golijani-Moghaddam
Nima Golijani-Moghaddam

16 July 2018 in Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CNCarl Norwood
Carl Norwood
NGNima Golijani-Moghaddam
Nima Golijani-Moghaddam
SMSam Malins
Sam Malins
RSRachel Sabin‐Farrell
Rachel Sabin‐Farrell

30 April 2016 in Supportive Care in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NGNima Golijani-Moghaddam
Nima Golijani-Moghaddam
HCHelen Coxon
Helen Coxon
SNSally Nabarro
Sally Nabarro
BHBeth Hardy
Beth Hardy
KCKaren Cox
Karen Cox

17 September 2012 in BMC Palliative Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Kathryn AlmackKathryn Almack
Kathryn Almack
KCKaren Cox
Karen Cox
NGNima Golijani-Moghaddam
Nima Golijani-Moghaddam
KPKristian Pollock
Kristian Pollock
JSJane Seymour
Jane Seymour
This study explores with patients, carers and health care professionals if, when and how Advance Care Planning conversations about patients’ preferences for place of care (and death) were facilitated and documented.

22 August 2016 in Journal of Attention Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZYZoe Young
Zoe Young
NGNima Golijani-Moghaddam
Nima Golijani-Moghaddam
ATAnna Tickle
Anna Tickle
Objective: To systematically review the literature on published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for adult ADHD and to establish the effectiveness of CBT in reducing ADHD symptoms. Method: A systematic review of nine RCTs and two subsequent meta-analyses of eight of the studies were conducted. Results: Just nine studies were identified, of generally good quality but with some limitations. Four trials (total N = 160) compared CBT with waiting list controls, and three trials (total N = 191) compared CBT with appropriate active control groups. Meta-analyses showed that CBT was superior to waiting list with a moderate to large effect size (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.21, 1.31], p = .006) and superior to active control groups with a small to moderate effect size (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI [0.14, 0.71], p = .004). Conclusion: These results give support to the efficacy of CBT in reducing symptoms of ADHD post-intervention.