Gut dysbiosis has a role in the pathogenesis of lupus. Synbiotic supplementation may restore the balance of gut microbiota. This study investigated whether synbiotics could improve gut microbiota and systemic inflammation in lupus patients. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in adult systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Subjects were randomized to receive either synbiotics or a placebo. Fecal microbiota, hs-CRP, IL-6, and IL-17 were measured at baseline and after 60 days. Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomized into synbiotic (n = 23) and placebo groups (n = 23). In the synbiotic group, hs-CRP was not significantly increased (1.8 [0.9; 4.85] vs. 2.1 [0.9; 4.25] mg/L; pre vs. post; p = 0.23), whereas in the placebo group hs-CRP was increased significantly (1.75 [0.4; 4.45] vs. 3.75 [0.58; 7.05] mg/L; pre vs. post; p = 0.005). In the synbiotic group, IL-6 decreased significantly (8.76 [6.62; 11.39] vs. 6.59 [4.96; 8.01]; pre vs. post; p = 0.02), while there was no significant change in IL-17 level. In the placebo group, there was no significant change in IL-6 and IL-17. Synbiotic supplementation increased the Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio (0.05 ± 0.60 vs. −0.08 ± 0.63, synbiotic vs. placebo p = 0.48) and butyrate metabolism (p = 0.037) and decreased amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism (p = 0.040). There was improvement in the SLE disease activity index 2K (SLEDAI-2K) score in the synbiotic group (14 [9; 16] vs. 8 [2; 12]; pre vs. post; p < 0.001), while no change in the placebo group (9 [8; 18.25] vs. 9 [5.5; 15]; pre vs. post; p = 0.31). Synbiotic supplementation could reduce systemic inflammation and SLE disease activity and alter the composition and functions of gut microbiota.

Patients with autoimmune diseases are among the susceptible groups to COVID-19 infection because of the complexity of their conditions and the side effects of the immunosuppressive drugs used to treat them. They might show impaired immunogenicity to COVID-19 vaccines and have a higher risk of developing COVID-19. Using a systematic review and meta-analysis, this research sought to summarize the evidence on COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety in patients with autoimmune diseases following predefined eligibility criteria. Research articles were obtained from an initial search up to 26 September 2022 from PubMed, Embase, EBSCOhost, ProQuest, MedRxiv, bioRxiv, SSRN, EuroPMC, and the Cochrane Center of Randomized Controlled Trials (CCRCT). Of 76 eligible studies obtained, 29, 54, and 38 studies were included in systematic reviews of efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety, respectively, and 6, 18, and 4 studies were included in meta-analyses for efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety, respectively. From the meta-analyses, patients with autoimmune diseases showed more frequent breakthrough COVID-19 infections and lower total antibody (TAb) titers, IgG seroconversion, and neutralizing antibodies after inactivated COVID-19 vaccination compared with healthy controls. They also had more local and systemic adverse events after the first dose of inactivated vaccination compared with healthy controls. After COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, patients with autoimmune diseases had lower TAb titers and IgG seroconversion compared with healthy controls.

Background: Health care workers (HCWs) are a high-priority group for COVID-19 vaccination for several reasons. Health behavior theory-based studies on the intention or acceptability of COVID-19 vaccination among Indonesian HCWs is lacking. Using an integrated behavioral model, this research sought to identify Indonesian health care workers’ intentions to obtain COVID-19 vaccines. Methods: A countrywide cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was conducted. The questionnaire was constructed on the basis of IBM (integrated behavioral model) constructs and scored on a seven-point bipolar scale. A hierarchical multivariable regression was used to evaluate the fit of the predictor model as well as the correlations between variables in the study. Results: 3304 people responded to the survey. A model combining demographic and IBM characteristics predicted 42.5 percent (adjusted R² = 0.42) of the COVID-19 vaccination intention. Vaccination intention was associated with favorable vaccine attitudes, perceived norms, and self-efficacy. Among the determining constructs, behavior belief predicted vaccination intention the best. Being female, being married, having a history of COVID-19 infection, living outside Java Island, and having a low income were all linked to lower vaccination intentions. Conclusions: This study confirms the IBM model’s robustness in predicting health care workers’ intention to vaccinate against COVID-19.

Facing the rising cases of with higher fatalities COVID-19, some countries decided to give the third dose of vaccine as a booster. As of 9 January 2022, 90.31% of health workers in Indonesia have received the third dose vaccine. This study aims to provide an evaluation of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) in a single center in Indonesia to form a basis for ensuring safety for booster administration nationally. A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey. Demographic data, AEFI complaints, and factors influencing AEFIs were evaluated. In this study, there were a total of 311 subjects were gathered. The most common AEFI symptoms found at onset <24 h to 28 days were pain at the injection site, fever, shoulder pain, and headache. Most of the AEFI severity of <24 h to 28 days post-vaccination was grade 1 (reduced or uninterrupted daily activities). There was a significant correlation between AEFI and several factors, such as the history of drug allergy, exercise after vaccination, age, BMI < 25, history of symptoms after the first and second vaccinations, and history of COVID-19. There was no anaphylactic reaction in this study. Several AEFI should be considered for the third dose of COVID-19 vaccine administration.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially among health-care workers. One of the most important preventive measures is vaccination. This study examined factors associated with the incidence rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection after mRNA-1273 booster vaccination (preceded by the CoronaVac primary vaccination) and the antibody profile of health-care workers at one of the tertiary hospitals in Indonesia. This was a combined retrospective cohort and cross-sectional study. Three hundred health-care workers who were given the mRNA-1273 booster vaccine a minimum of 5 months prior to this study were randomly selected. Participants were then interviewed about their history of COVID-19 vaccination, history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and comorbidities. Blood samples were taken to assess IgG sRBD antibody levels. The median antibody level was found to be 659 BAU/mL (min 37 BAU/mL, max 5680 BAU/mL, QIR 822 BAU/mL) after the booster, and this was not related to age, sex, comorbidities, or adverse events following immunization (AEFI) after the booster. SARS-CoV-2 infection after the booster was correlated with higher antibody levels. In sum, 56 participants (18.6%) experienced SARS-CoV-2 infection after the mRNA-1273 booster vaccination within 5 months. Incidence per person per month was 3.2%. Age, sex, diabetes mellitus type 2, hypertension, obesity, and post-booster AEFI were not related to COVID-19 incidence after the booster. History of SARS-CoV-2 infection before the booster vaccination was significantly associated with a reduced risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection after booster vaccination, with a relative risk (RR) of 0.21 (95% CI 0.09–0.45, p < 0.001).

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the knowledge, attitude, and behavior of people living with HIV (PLWH) during the COVID-19 pandemic and the pandemic’s impact on their socioeconomic conditions, antiretroviral adherence, and worries. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in May–August 2020 at the Integrated HIV Center of Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Indonesia. The data were collected using an online questionnaire and an offline paper-based questionnaire. Results: A total of 545 subjects participated in this study, 72.8% (397) of which were male. Most subjects were middle-aged (36– 55 years old) (66.5%). Many subjects reported to have experienced reduced incomes (49.2%) or losses of income (22.4%), while 15.6% reported losing their job during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most subjects (97%) wished to continue treatment despite the many obstacles, and the subjects’ knowledge about COVID-19 and its prevention was considerably good. More than 70% of subjects reported that they have been implementing the general precautions of the COVID-19 pandemic: maintaining distance, wearing a mask, washing hands, and avoiding crowds. Conclusion: This study provides an overview of what PLWH are experiencing, which will allow for policy-making that can help them continue their treatment with consideration of the possibility of having to live a “new normal” future.