(1) Background: The need to elucidate the microbial patterns in preservation fluid and explore their relationship with early infection-related events post kidney transplant and investigate antimicrobial resistance and the effects of preemptive antibiotic therapy. (2) Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 514 kidney transplant donors and 808 recipients from April 2015 to October 2020. Clinical data of donor and recipient characteristics, preservation fluid microbes, early infections (≤30 days), probable donor-derived infections (P-DDIs), antimicrobial resistance and preemptive antibiotic therapy was collected. (3) Results: The incidence of bloodstream (10.3% versus 5.2%, p = 0.006) and graft-site infections (9.7% versus 4.6%, p = 0.004) was significantly higher in recipients with culture-positive preservation fluid. In addition, recipients with ESKAPE pathogens or Candida species had a notably higher rate of bloodstream infections (14.1% versus 6.9%, p = 0.033) and graft-site infections (16.7% versus 3.5%, p < 0.01) than those with other positive pathogens. Preemptive antibiotic therapy decreased the bloodstream infection rate (11.8% versus 35.7%, p = 0.047) when preservation fluid was positive for ESKAPE pathogens. (4) Conclusions: Culture-positive preservation fluid has potential implications for kidney transplant recipients. ESKAPE pathogens or Candida species in preservation fluid as well as their antimicrobial resistance properties and non-preemptive antibiotic therapy could pose a risk of early infection-related events.

Portopulmonary hypertension (PPH) was once regarded as a contraindicaton to liver transplantation (LT). However, growing evidence has indicated that PPH patients undergoing LT may show similar outcomes compared to those without PPH, and researchers have recommended it not be an absolute contraindication. Given this controversy, we aimed to identify and review the current evidence on this topic and to provide a comparison of the outcomes after LT between candidates with PPH and those without. We systematically searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases for all studies that compared the outcomes of PPH patients and those without PPH after LT. All studies reporting outcomes of PPH patients versus those without PPH (Control) were further considered for inclusion in this meta-analysis. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to compare the pooled data between PPH and Control groups. Eleven retrospective trials and one prospective, randomized, controlled trial, involving 37,686 transplant recipients were included. The PPH patients had increased 1-year mortality with an OR of 1.59 (95% CI = 1.26–2.01, P = 0.0001) compared to the control group. There was no significant difference in graft loss and 30-day mortality after LT between the two groups. Patients with PPH who underwent LT had increased 1-year mortality compared to those without PPH, while graft loss and 30-day mortality were similar. Nevertheless, LT may be a reasonable therapeutic option for some patients with PPH, but further studies are needed to identify those select patients with PPH who would benefit most from LT.

Background.: Kidneys from very small pediatric donors (VSPDs, aged <2 y) are underutilized. Concerns regarding potentially inferior outcomes hinder the use in pediatric recipients. Methods.: All pediatric kidney-only transplants from <18-year-old donors between January 2012 and May 2021 in our center were included in this study. Outcomes were compared between VSPD and normal pediatric donor (NPD, aged 2–18 y) groups, and 3-y death-censored graft survival was assessed by the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. Results.: Of all 252 enrolled patients, 149 (59.1%) received kidneys from NPDs and 103 (40.9%) from VSPDs. The 3-y graft survival rates of the NPD and VSPD groups were 91.2% and 88.6%, respectively (P = 0.385). The adjusted hazard ratio of 3-y graft loss was 1.2 (95% confidence interval, 0.6-2.5; P = 0.659) for the VSPD group compared with the NPD group. There was no significant difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 y posttransplant observed between NPD and VSPD groups (86.9 ± 26.8 versus 87 ± 27.9 mL/min/1.73 m²; P = 0.991). Patients (n = 12, 4.8%) who received kidneys from donors <5 kg contributed 5 (5/39, 12.8%) with delayed graft function and the sole primary nonfunction in our cohort. Conclusions.: Although attention to preventing complications is necessary, especially for kidneys from donors <5 kg, kidneys from VSPDs did not appear to impart added risk for 3-y graft loss and renal function.

Recipients of living donor renal transplantation are typically considered to have a relatively lower immunological risk. This retrospective study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety between rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) or interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL2-RA) induction therapies in Chinese population. A total of 188 patients receiving living donor renal transplantation between February 2004 and December 2013 were included and divided into the rATG group and based on their induction therapy. The primary outcome was clinically-suspected rejection. The incidences of de novo donor-specific antigen (dn-DSA), graft survival, and infection were also compared between groups. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate the influential factors associated with clinically-suspected acute rejection and graft survival. The rATG group had a higher panel reactive antibody (PRA) score and more complete HLA mismatches than the IL2-RA group (both P < 0.001). The incidences of clinically-suspected acute rejection (9.8% vs. 8.8%; P = 0.832) and dn-DSA formation (4.9% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.44) were not significantly different between groups. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrated that the graft survivals of two groups were comparable (P = 0.857). After adjusting for patients’ age, sex, PRA, HLA mismatch confounders, and the use of corticoids, the multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that methods of induction therapy were not associated with clinically-suspected acute rejection and graft survival (both P > 0.05). The incidences of complications (infections, pneumonia, liver injury and myelosuppression) were all comparable between groups (all P > 0.05). These results suggested that rATG could be a safe and efficient immunosuppressant when used in a Chinese recipient population with a higher immunological risk in living donor renal transplantation.

Background: Kidneys from very small pediatric donors (≤10 kg) are underutilized. Compared to en bloc kidney transplantation (EBKT), single kidney transplantation (SKT) can maximize donor resources. However, it remains unknown whether it’s appropriate to perform SKTs from donors weighing ≤10 kg. Methods: A total of 35 adult recipients undergoing kidney transplantation from donors weighing ≤10 kg at our center from December 2014 to December 2019 were included and grouped into SKT group (n=20) and EBKT group (n=15). Transplant outcomes were retrospectively analyzed and compared between 2 groups. Results: The 1-year and 3-year death-censored graft survival in SKT group was 95%, it is not significantly higher than that in EBKT group (80%, log-rank test, P=0.38). Significant improvement in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was noted in both groups, despite eGFR at 1 year was lower in the SKT group (P<0.01). Proteinuria was common in both groups but subsided gradually during the follow-up time. Complication rates were similar between 2 groups with no vascular thrombosis in the SKT group. Conclusions: In conclusion, SKTs from donors weighing ≤10 kg to adult recipients achieves comparable outcomes with EBKTs, which provides evidence to support performing SKTs from donors weighing ≤10 kg in certain donor and recipient scenarios.