Inês N. Ramos

Inês N. Ramos


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 March 2025 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMahsa Farrokhi
Mahsa Farrokhi
IRInês N. Ramos
Inês N. Ramos
Cristina L. M. SilvaCristina L. M. Silva
Cristina L. M. Silva
Ultrasound (US) treatment is an eco-friendly physical modification technique increasingly used to enhance the functionality of gluten-free flours. In this study, the impact of sonication on the techno-functional, thermal, structural, and rheological properties of a composite gluten-free flour was investigated. The flour, comprising corn starch, rice flour, and other ingredients, was treated at hydration levels of 15% and 25% (w/w) under controlled conditions (10 min of sonication at 20 °C) and compared to a non-sonicated control. Sonication reduced the water absorption capacity (WAC) and swelling power (SP) while increasing the oil absorption capacity (OAC) and water solubility (WSI). Thermal analysis revealed lower gelatinization enthalpy, indicating structural modifications induced by cavitation. Structural assessments (XRD and FTIR) confirmed minimal alterations in crystallinity and short-range order. Rheological studies demonstrated an enhanced elasticity in the gel structure, especially at 15% hydration, while a morphological analysis via SEM highlighted particle fragmentation and surface roughening. These findings demonstrate the potential of ultrasound to modify gluten-free flours for improved functionality and diverse applications in gluten-free product development.

2 September 2022 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RSRocío Santiago-Ramos
Rocío Santiago-Ramos
Cristina L. M. SilvaCristina L. M. Silva
Cristina L. M. Silva
IRInês N. Ramos
Inês N. Ramos
A snack made of 36% by byproducts of grape and tomato pomaces was developed, also including other ingredients, such as oats, chia, quinoa, honey and peanut butter. The recipe was defined as tasty and healthy by a focus group. The snack was produced by using forced air at three different drying temperatures (50 °C, 60 °C and 70 °C). The Newton, Page, Henderson and Pabis, and Midilli–Kucuk models fit the drying curves well. The average values for the Newton’s model drying constants were k50 = 2.71 × 10−1 ± 3 × 10−3 min−1, k60 = 2.76 10−1 ± 4 × 10−3 min−1 and k70 = 3.91 × 10−1 ± 8 × 10−3 min−1 at 50 °C, 60 °C and 70 °C, respectively. The product’s quality was assessed in terms of storage with respect to water activity and texture (hardness, springiness, cohesiveness, chewiness and resilience). There were no differences among the three tested processing temperatures in terms of their influence the final product’s quality. As there were no significant differences between initial and final water activity and texture attributes at any temperature and they were mainly unaltered during storage, the snack bar was considered stable during this period. This new snack, which includes byproducts from the food industry, reduces food waste and contributes to a circular economic model, simultaneously presenting environmental and economic advantages.