Hamid Riazi-Esfahani

Dr. Hamid Riazi-Esfahani

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2014 in Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MRMohammad Riazi-Esfahani
Mohammad Riazi-Esfahani
Mohammad Hossein MaghamiMohammad Hossein Maghami
Mohammad Hossein Maghami
ASAmirMasoud Sodagar
AmirMasoud Sodagar
ALAlireza Lashay
Alireza Lashay
HRHamid Riazi-Esfahani
Hamid Riazi-Esfahani
Millions of patients are either slowly losing their vision or are already blind due to retinal degenerative diseases such as retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or because of accidents or injuries. Employment of artificial means to treat extreme vision impairment has come closer to reality during the past few decades. Currently, many research groups work towards effective solutions to restore a rudimentary sense of vision to the blind. Aside from the efforts being put on replacing damaged parts of the retina by engineered living tissues or microfabricated photoreceptor arrays, implantable electronic microsystems, referred to as visual prostheses, are also sought as promising solutions to restore vision. From a functional point of view, visual prostheses receive image information from the outside world and deliver them to the natural visual system, enabling the subject to receive a meaningful perception of the image. This paper provides an overview of technical design aspects and clinical test results of visual prostheses, highlights past and recent progress in realizing chronic high-resolution visual implants as well as some technical challenges confronted when trying to enhance the functional quality of such devices.

1 September 2018 in Ophthalmology Retina
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRamak Roohipoor
Ramak Roohipoor
RKReza Karkhaneh
Reza Karkhaneh
MRMohammad Riazi-Esfahani
Mohammad Riazi-Esfahani
AFAfsar Dastjani Farahani
Afsar Dastjani Farahani
AKAlireza Khodabandeh
Alireza Khodabandeh
BMBobeck S. Modjtahedi
Bobeck S. Modjtahedi

28 February 2024 in Ophthalmology Retina
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RKReza Karkhaneh
Reza Karkhaneh
HFHooshang Faghihi
Hooshang Faghihi
HRHamid Riazi-Esfahani
Hamid Riazi-Esfahani
MAMojtaba Abrishami
Mojtaba Abrishami
FBFatemeh Bazvand
Fatemeh Bazvand
KFKhalil Ghasemi Falavarjani
Khalil Ghasemi Falavarjani

2 September 2022 in Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EPElias Khalili Pour
Elias Khalili Pour
KRKhosro Rezaee
Khosro Rezaee
HAHossein Azimi
Hossein Azimi
SMSeyed Mohammad Mirshahvalad
Seyed Mohammad Mirshahvalad
BJBehzad Jafari
Behzad Jafari
MEMohammad Riazi Esfahani
Mohammad Riazi Esfahani

1 September 2019 in Journal of Current Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AMAhmad Mirshahi
Ahmad Mirshahi
FGFariba Ghassemi
Fariba Ghassemi
KFKaveh Fadakar
Kaveh Fadakar
RMReza Mirshahi
Reza Mirshahi
FBFatemeh Bazvand
Fatemeh Bazvand
HRHamid Riazi-Esfahani
Hamid Riazi-Esfahani
To evaluate the optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) parameters in patients with diabetic retinopathy following panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). Eleven eyes of 6 patients with very severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) or early proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) were recruited in this prospective interventional pilot study. All patients underwent OCTA imaging at baseline, and choroidal flow, foveal avascular zone (FAZ), retinal thickness, and vascular density were measured at baseline. Three months after treatment, OCTA was repeated, and the alteration in variables was analyzed. The FAZ area remained unchanged following treatment, (P = 0.75). Retinal thickness increased along (P = 0.02) with an increase in vascular density in the superficial and deep foveal area and the macular temporal sector (P = 0.007, 0.03 and 0.049, respectively). Choroidal flow surface area was unchanged (P = 0.10). In this study, foveal vascular density increased and FAZ remained unchanged after PRP for diabetic retinopathy.

1 December 2019 in Clinical Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FGFariba Ghassemi
Fariba Ghassemi
HKHassan Khojasteh
Hassan Khojasteh
AKAlireza Khodabande
Alireza Khodabande
LDLauren A Dalvin
Lauren A Dalvin
MMMehdi Mazloumi
Mehdi Mazloumi
MMMasoud Mirghorbani
Masoud Mirghorbani
Purpose: To evaluate and compare three different techniques of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap in the treatment of large idiopathic full-thickness macular hole. Methods: In a comparative interventional case series, 72 eyes from 72 patients with large (> 400 μm) full-thickness macular hole were randomly enrolled into three different groups: group A – hemicircular ILM peel with temporally hinged inverted flap; group B – circular ILM peel with temporally hinged inverted flap; and group C – circular ILM peel with superior inverted flap. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), anatomical closure rate, and ellipsoid zone (EZ) or external limiting membrane (ELM) defects were evaluated preoperatively, at week 1, and months 1, 3 and 6 after surgery. Results: There were 24 eyes in group A, 23 in group B, and 25 in group C. In all three groups, larger diameter macular hole was associated with worse preoperative visual acuity (r=0.625, P<0.001). Mean BCVA improved significantly in all three groups 6 months after surgery (0.91vs 0.55, p<0.001). 6 months after surgery, mean BCVA improved from 0.91 logMAR to 0.52±0.06 in group A, 0.90 to 0.53±0.06 in group B, and 0.91 to 0.55±0.11 in group C. In group A vs. B vs. C, improvement of BCVA was 0.380±0.04 vs. 0.383±0.04 vs. 0.368±0.11 logMAR, with no statistically significant difference between groups (P=0.660). The rate of successful hole closure was 87.5% vs. 91.3% vs. 100%. Although the closure rate was 100% in Group C (circular ILM peel with superiorly hinged inverted flap), this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.115). Conclusion: ILM peel with an inverted flap is a highly effective procedure for the treatment of large, full-thickness macular hole. Different flap techniques have comparable results, indicating that the technique can be chosen based on surgeon preference.