Virulent footrot is a significant economic and animal welfare concern. The disease can be treated, controlled, and eliminated with vaccine, but selecting the appropriate vaccination strategy can be challenging. There are two main strategies: outbreak (serogroup)-specific univalent or bivalent vaccination, or use of a multivalent vaccine containing up to nine of the most common serogroups. The objective of this study was to compare these approaches in sheep flocks infected with multiple Dichelobacter nodosus serogroups. In the first phase, we undertook an immunogenicity trial in which we compared four pre-commercial multivalent recombinant fimbrial vaccines containing six (A, B, C, G, H, I) or nine (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I) serogroups, and compared them to commercial bivalent vaccines. Two multivalent vaccines stimulated significantly higher antibody responses than two other multivalent vaccines but the number of serogroups included in the multivalent vaccine formulations did not have a significant effect. In the first phase, we also compared inter-vaccination intervals of two- and three-months between sequential bivalent vaccines, and found that a two-month interval was sufficient to avoid antigenic competition. In the second phase, the most immunogenic multivalent vaccine (nine serogroups) was compared to sequential bivalent vaccines and monthly foot-bathing in a field trial in four commercial Merino flocks. The duration of protection afforded by the multivalent vaccine was likely to be less than that of the bivalent vaccines, as the antibody titres stimulated were lower and less persistent.

The study objectives were to understand the practices and perceptions of sheep farmers and district veterinarians (DVs) towards sheep health management and, the impact of disease at the farm level in addition to the availability, accessibility, and use of veterinary services. Data were collected using question-based surveys, distributed online and in-person to sheep farmers (45 respondents) and DVs (25 respondents). Most farmers were male, ≥51 years old, who placed a high priority on the health and welfare of their sheep. For disease prevention most farmers vaccinated their sheep (91%) and 86.7% had a farm biosecurity plan, although its components and their application varied, e.g., the isolation of new or sick sheep. Fencing costs were most frequently identified (70.5% respondents) as a financial concern for sheep farmers. Their most common sources of information about disease control and prevention were DVs (66.7%), private veterinarians (60.0%), the internet (42.9%), rural suppliers (35.7%), and farmers/neighbours (28.6%). Fifty-eight percent of farmers reported a long distance from veterinarian services. Farmers preferred to receive information via email (77.8%), whereas 56% of DVs preferred to share information via phone call. This discrepancy presents an opportunity to align these mechanisms more closely for effective dissemination of information and increased producer engagement.