Chang-Xing Ma

Dr. Chang-Xing Ma

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2018 in Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJeffrey M. Lackner
Jeffrey M. Lackner
JJJames Jaccard
James Jaccard
LKLaurie Keefer
Laurie Keefer
DBDarren M. Brenner
Darren M. Brenner
RFRebecca S. Firth
Rebecca S. Firth
MSMichael D. Sitrin
Michael D. Sitrin

17 May 2012 in Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DGDaniel Gelfond
Daniel Gelfond
Chang-Xing MaChang-Xing Ma
Chang-Xing Ma
JSJack Semler
Jack Semler
DBDrucy Borowitz
Drucy Borowitz

13 April 2011 in Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RFRobert J. Foxenberg
Robert J. Foxenberg
CECorie A. Ellison
Corie A. Ellison
JKJames B. Knaak
James B. Knaak
Chang-Xing MaChang-Xing Ma
Chang-Xing Ma
JOJames R. Olson
James R. Olson

1 January 2012 in BMC Genomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LYLi Yan
Li Yan
Chang-Xing MaChang-Xing Ma
Chang-Xing Ma
DWDan Wang
Dan Wang
QHQiang Hu
Qiang Hu
MQMaochun Qin
Maochun Qin
Song LiuSong Liu
Song Liu
Batch effect is one type of variability that is not of primary interest but ubiquitous in sizable genomic experiments. To minimize the impact of batch effects, an ideal experiment design should ensure the even distribution of biological groups and confounding factors across batches. However, due to the practical complications, the availability of the final collection of samples in genomics study might be unbalanced and incomplete, which, without appropriate attention in sample-to-batch allocation, could lead to drastic batch effects. Therefore, it is necessary to develop effective and handy tool to assign collected samples across batches in an appropriate way in order to minimize the impact of batch effects.

21 April 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Chang-Xing MaChang-Xing Ma
Chang-Xing Ma
GSGuogen Shan
Guogen Shan
SLSong Liu
Song Liu
In ophthalmologic studies, measurements obtained from both eyes of an individual are often highly correlated. Ignoring the correlation could lead to incorrect inferences. An asymptotic method was proposed by Tang and others (2008) for testing equality of proportions between two groups under Rosner's model. In this article, we investigate three testing procedures for general g ≥ 2 groups. Our simulation results show the score testing procedure usually produces satisfactory type I error control and has reasonable power. The three test procedures get closer when sample size becomes larger. Examples from ophthalmologic studies are used to illustrate our proposed methods.

9 June 2016 in Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Chang-Xing MaChang-Xing Ma
Chang-Xing Ma
SLSong Liu
Song Liu
In ophthalmologic studies, bilateral correlated data often arise when information involving paired organs (e.g., eyes) are measured from each subject. Adjusted chi-square approach for testing the equality of proportions has been proposed in the literature. In this article, we investigate and derive three alter- native testing procedures for the problem. Our simulation results show the score testing procedure usually produces satisfactory type I error control with higher power, and therefore is recommended. Examples from ophthalmologic studies are used to illustrate our proposed methods.