The increasing burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) despite the progress in management entails the need of more effective preventive and curative strategies. As dietary-associated risk is the most important behavioral factor influencing global health, it appears the best target in the challenge against CVD. Although for many years, since the formulation of the cholesterol hypothesis, a nutrient-based approach was attempted for CVD prevention and treatment, in recent years a dietary-based approach resulted more effective in reducing cardiovascular risk worldwide. After the publication of randomized trials on the remarkable effects of the Mediterranean diet and the Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet on CVD, new efforts were put on research about the effects of complex dietary interventions on CVD. The purpose of this paper is to review the evidence on dietary interventions in the prevention and disease modification of CVD, focusing on coronary artery disease and heart failure, the main disease responsible for the enormous toll taken by CVD worldwide.

Heart failure (HF) is the main cause of mortality and morbidity in Western countries. Although evidence-based treatments have substantially improved outcomes, prognosis remains poor with high costs for health care systems. In patients with HF, poor dietary behaviors are associated with unsatisfactory quality of life and adverse outcome. The HF guidelines have not recommended a specific nutritional strategy. Despite the role of micronutrient deficiency it has been extensively studied, data about the efficacy of supplementation therapy in HF are not supported by large randomized trials and there is limited evidence regarding the outcomes. The aim of the present review is to analyze the state-of-the-art of nutritional deficiencies in HF, focusing on the physiological role and the prognostic impact of micronutrient supplementation.

In recent years, there has been growing interest in the risk stratification for heart failure, and the use of multiple biomarkers to identify different pathophysiological processes associated with this condition. One such biomarker is soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2), which has shown some potential for integration into clinical practice. sST2 is produced by both cardiac fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes in response to myocardial stress. Other sources of sST2 are endothelial cells of the aorta and coronary arteries and immune cells such as T cells. Indeed, ST2 is also associated with inflammatory and immune processes. We aimed at reviewing the prognostic value of sST2 in both chronic and acute heart failure. In this setting, we also provide a flowchart about its potential use in clinical practice.

Candidate patients for cardiac surgery procedures with a history of malignancies and antitumour therapy or with an active cancer and on antineoplastic treatment are increasingly common in daily practice. Oncological therapy can lead to cardiovascular injury and, therefore, has the potential for impacting operative risks and surgical strategies. This means that a number of considerations are essential to take into account prior to cardiac surgery. These include the type of cancer, previous cardiotoxicity or concomitant antitumour therapy, reversibility or irreversibility of such complications, the interaction between cancer disease course and extracorporeal circulation, the need for associated surgery and the impact of cancer on early and long-term outcomes. Adequate preoperative evaluation of cardiovascular abnormalities potentially related to antineoplastic therapy and proper diagnostic workup of other conditions linked to the type of cancer (e.g. haematological disorders and lung dysfunction) are therefore of paramount importance for appropriate surgical decision-making. Careful evaluation of the association of cardiovascular disease to be treated and the prognosis of remitted or active cancer should be established to enhance the prediction of early, medium and long-term outcomes and for a more correctly informed patient. Furthermore, if the prognosis of operated patients appears unfavourable, then alternative therapeutic strategies can be applied without significant delay. The aim of this review is to give an overview of factors that should be considered in adult patients who are undergoing, or have undergone, treatment for oncological indications who are candidates for cardiac surgery.

Patients who experienced cardiovascular side effects during cancer therapy with carfilzomib for multiple myeloma had relapsed multiple myeloma, so have be previously treated with other cancer therapies. The present is a single center cohort study to evaluate early cardiovascular effects of administration of irreversible proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib in naïve patients. We included 24 patients and collected cardiovascular side effects, echocardiographic parameters and endothelial function at baseline and after 4 cycles. At early follow up we observed increase in blood arterial pressure values (mean change in systolic pressure of 10 mmHg (P-value < 0.01; diastolic arterial pressure and mean arterial pressure of 3.3 mmHg and 5.4 mmHg, both P-value < 0.01). Reactive hyperemia PAT index was reduced in the whole cohort by a mean of 0.46 points (P-value < 0.01); diastolic function was changed: E-wave-deceleration-time (EDT) was reduced by 49,96 ± 31 ms, P-value < 0.05 and early diastolic tissue Doppler velocity (e') by a mean value of 1.46 cm/s, P - value 0.04. At early follow up we did not observe events of grade 3 or 4. We observe correlation between events and endothelial dysfunction at baseline and age (OR 1.9, CI 95% 0.05-5.804, P- value: 0.038 for RHI<1.67; OR 1,4, CI 95%0.99-2.56, P- value: 0.04 for age). Our results suggest that therapy with carfilzomib when used as first line therapy is responsible for increase in systemic blood pressure, alteration of endothelium-mediated vascular dilatation and early myocardial diastolic dysfunction.