Katherine S. Bridge

Dr. Katherine S. Bridge

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 January 2012 in Nature Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DFDaniel E. Foxler
Daniel E. Foxler
KBKatherine S. Bridge
Katherine S. Bridge
VJVictoria James
Victoria James
TWThomas M. Webb
Thomas M. Webb
MMMaureen Mee
Maureen Mee
TSTyson V. Sharp
Tyson V. Sharp

1 July 2017 in Cell Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KBKatherine S. Bridge
Katherine S. Bridge
KSKunal M. Shah
Kunal M. Shah
YLYigen Li
Yigen Li
DFDaniel E. Foxler
Daniel E. Foxler
SWSybil C.K. Wong
Sybil C.K. Wong
Tyson SharpTyson Sharp
Tyson Sharp
As core components of the microRNA-induced silencing complex (miRISC), Argonaute (AGO) proteins interact with TNRC6 proteins, recruiting other effectors of translational repression/mRNA destabilization. Here, we show that LIMD1 coordinates the assembly of an AGO-TNRC6 containing miRISC complex by binding both proteins simultaneously at distinct interfaces. Phosphorylation of AGO2 at Ser 387 by Akt3 induces LIMD1 binding, which in turn enables AGO2 to interact with TNRC6A and downstream effector DDX6. Conservation of this serine in AGO1 and 4 indicates this mechanism may be a fundamental requirement for AGO function and miRISC assembly. Upon CRISPR-Cas9-mediated knockout of LIMD1, AGO2 miRNA-silencing function is lost and miRNA silencing becomes dependent on a complex formed by AGO3 and the LIMD1 family member WTIP. The switch to AGO3 utilization occurs due to the presence of a glutamic acid residue (E390) on the interaction interface, which allows AGO3 to bind to LIMD1, AJUBA, and WTIP irrespective of Akt signaling.

30 September 2022 in Frontiers in Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BRBeatrice Rix
Beatrice Rix
AMAndres Hernandez Maduro
Andres Hernandez Maduro
KBKatherine S. Bridge
Katherine S. Bridge
WGWilliam Grey
William Grey
The haematopoietic system is a classical stem cell hierarchy that maintains all the blood cells in the body. Haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are rare, highly potent cells that reside at the apex of this hierarchy and are historically some of the most well studied stem cells in humans and laboratory models, with haematopoiesis being the original system to define functional cell types by cell surface markers. Whilst it is possible to isolate HSCs to near purity, we know very little about the functional activity of markers to purify HSCs. This review will focus on the historical efforts to purify HSCs in humans based on cell surface markers, their putative functions and recent advances in finding functional markers on HSCs.

23 February 2023 in Blood Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KIKyomi J. Igarashi
Kyomi J. Igarashi
IKIwo Kucinski
Iwo Kucinski
YCYan Yi Chan
Yan Yi Chan
TTTze-Kai Tan
Tze-Kai Tan
HKHwei Minn Khoo
Hwei Minn Khoo
AWAdam C. Wilkinson
Adam C. Wilkinson
Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are a rare type of hematopoietic cell that can entirely reconstitute the blood and immune system after transplantation. Allogeneic HSC transplantation (HSCT) is used clinically as a curative therapy for a range of hematolymphoid diseases; however, it remains a high-risk therapy because of its potential side effects, including poor graft function and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Ex vivo HSC expansion has been suggested as an approach to improve hematopoietic reconstitution in low-cell dose grafts. Here, we demonstrate that the selectivity of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)-based mouse HSC cultures can be improved using physioxic culture conditions. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis helped confirm the inhibition of lineage-committed progenitor cells in physioxic cultures. Long-term physioxic expansion also afforded culture-based ex vivo HSC selection from whole bone marrow, spleen, and embryonic tissues. Furthermore, we provide evidence that HSC-selective ex vivo cultures deplete GVHD-causing T cells and that this approach can be combined with genotoxic-free antibody-based conditioning HSCT approaches. Our results offer a simple approach to improve PVA-based HSC cultures and the underlying molecular phenotype, and highlight the potential translational implications of selective HSC expansion systems for allogeneic HSCT.

21 June 2018 in EMBO Molecular Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DFDaniel E Foxler
Daniel E Foxler
KBKatherine S. Bridge
Katherine S. Bridge
JFJohn G Foster
John G Foster
PGPaul Grevitt
Paul Grevitt
SCSean Curry
Sean Curry
Tyson SharpTyson Sharp
Tyson Sharp
The adaptive cellular response to low oxygen tensions is mediated by the hypoxia‐inducible factors (HIFs), a family of heterodimeric transcription factors composed of HIF‐α and HIF‐β subunits. Prolonged HIF expression is a key contributor to cellular transformation, tumorigenesis and metastasis. As such, HIF degradation under hypoxic conditions is an essential homeostatic and tumour‐suppressive mechanism. LIMD1 complexes with PHD2 and VHL in physiological oxygen levels (normoxia) to facilitate proteasomal degradation of the HIF‐α subunit. Here, we identify LIMD1 as a HIF‐1 target gene, which mediates a previously uncharacterised, negative regulatory feedback mechanism for hypoxic HIF‐α degradation by modulating PHD2‐LIMD1‐VHL complex formation. Hypoxic induction of LIMD1 expression results in increased HIF‐α protein degradation, inhibiting HIF‐1 target gene expression, tumour growth and vascularisation. Furthermore, we report that copy number variation at the LIMD1 locus occurs in 47.1% of lung adenocarcinoma patients, correlates with enhanced expression of a HIF target gene signature and is a negative prognostic indicator. Taken together, our data open a new field of research into the aetiology, diagnosis and prognosis of LIMD1‐negative lung cancers. Synopsis This study identifies the tumour suppressor LIMD1 as a facilitator of an adaptive cellular response to hypoxia. Under hypoxic conditions, LIMD1 expression is induced, facilitating degradation of HIF, limiting HIF transcriptional activity and mitigating its pro‐tumorigenic effects. The LIMD1 promoter contains a hypoxia responsive element (HRE) and its expression is induced under hypoxic conditions driving increased HIF degradation via the PHD/VHL axis. HIF protein stability and transcriptional activity are reduced under chronic hypoxic conditions by LIMD1. Aberration of the LIMD1‐dependent hypoxic negative feedback loop causes larger and more vascularised tumours to grow in vivo. LIMD1 is lost in 47% of adenocarcinoma driving a hypoxic gene signature that serves as a negative prognostic indicator.

1 August 2015 in Bioscience Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AHAmeena J. Haider
Ameena J. Haider
MCMegan H. Cox
Megan H. Cox
NJNatalie Jones
Natalie Jones
AGAlice J. Goode
Alice J. Goode
KBKatherine S. Bridge
Katherine S. Bridge
IKIan Kerr
Ian Kerr
ABCG2 is an ABC (ATP-binding cassette) transporter with a physiological role in urate transport in the kidney and is also implicated in multi-drug efflux from a number of organs in the body. The trafficking of the protein and the mechanism by which it recognizes and transports diverse drugs are important areas of research. In the current study, we have made a series of single amino acid mutations in ABCG2 on the basis of sequence analysis. Mutant isoforms were characterized for cell surface expression and function. One mutant (I573A) showed disrupted glycosylation and reduced trafficking kinetics. In contrast with many ABC transporter folding mutations which appear to be ‘rescued’ by chemical chaperones or low temperature incubation, the I573A mutation was not enriched at the cell surface by either treatment, with the majority of the protein being retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Two other mutations (P485A and M549A) showed distinct effects on transport of ABCG2 substrates reinforcing the role of TM helix 3 in drug recognition and transport and indicating the presence of intracellular coupling regions in ABCG2.