BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to establish a standardized postoperative rehabilitation protocol following limb salvage surgery (LSS) in patients with primary bone sarcoma in five major anatomical locations: distal femur, proximal tibia, proximal and total femur, humerus and shoulder girdle and pelvic resections. SETTING AND DESIGN: Retrospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All LSSs were performed by an orthopedic oncology surgeon, and rehabilitation of all patients was based on a devised standardized rehabilitation protocol. Patient outcomes were measured using the modified Musculoskeletal Tumor Society–International Symposium on the Limb Salvage (MSTS–ISOLS) scoring system. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients received LSS in the above mentioned locations; endoprostheses were used in 49, bone allograft in five, while no replacements were made in five patients. At a mean follow-up of 24 months, the mean modified MSTS–ISOLS score for all patients was 87% (95% CI; 0.85–0.89). The highest scores were encountered for patients with distal femur replacement: 93% (95% CI; 0.91–0.95). Seven patients had interruption of more than six weeks in their rehabilitation and had a mean score of 71% (95% CI; 0.64–0.82). CONCLUSION: The proposed rehabilitation protocol is a comprehensive, organized and applicable guideline to be used after performing LSS at the above mentioned anatomical locations. The use of standardized rehabilitation protocol resulted in improved patient functional outcome.

Background. Joint-sparing limb salvage surgery (JSLSS) is an advancement in the techniques and concepts of limb salvage surgery, which makes it possible to save not only the limb affected by malignancy but also the adjacent joint and the epiphyseal plate. In the growing child, this procedure is technically demanding due to the availability of small length of bone for implant purchase. Reconstruction options can be biological reconstruction or endoprosthesis; however, the outcome of endoprosthetic reconstruction after joint-sparing resection is not well described in the literature. Purposes. (1) To determine the prosthesis survival rates when using customized Joint-Sparing Endoprosthesis (JSE) after juxta-articular resection of bone tumors, (2) to investigate the rates of local recurrence, (3) to evaluate the need for revision surgery, and (4) to compare the outcome of customized JSE with that of joint-sacrificing techniques. Methods. In our study, joint sparing is defined as any procedure where a custom-made JSE is used in lieu of sacrificing the adjacent joint whenever the length of the remaining bone segment is not enough to accommodate the stem of a modular implant. Twenty-eight patients received JSE, and 31 joints were spared. Their age ranged from 4 to 55 years with a median age of 13 years. Twenty-one patients received surgery for primary reconstruction and 7 patients for revision of failed bone allograft or modular implant. Twenty-four joints are spared in the lower limbs and 7 in the upper limbs. Osteosarcoma was the most common pathological diagnosis (n = 13). Flat surface HA-coated custom JSE was used to spare 15 joints, and short-stemmed custom JSE was used to spare 16 joints. The length of the remaining bone epiphysis for JSE anchorage from the knee and ankle joints was 25–75 mm, median = 45 mm, and the length of the cortical bone remaining for the proximal femur and distal humerus was 5–70 mm, median = 10 mm. Results. Operative time was 2.5 to 4 hours (avg. 3 hr.) The bone resection surface fitted the prosthesis surface with <2 mm difference. Histological examination of all resected specimens shows clear bone resection margins; 2 patients had positive soft tissue margins. At mean follow-up period of 3 years (6 months–10 years), 6 patients developed local and systemic recurrences, three of them had a pathological fracture at the time of diagnosis (P=0.139), and 4 showed a poor response to chemotherapy (P=0.014); all recurrences occurred in the soft tissue. Implant survival at 5 years was 86.15%, and MSTS score was 90% (83–96%). Conclusions. Whenever this kind of implant is affordable and can be utilized, particularly in younger age groups, JSE may be a good reconstruction option to avoid the use of expandable implants and to avoid the potentially higher revision and complication rates associated with biological reconstruction, as well as the complications of conventional joint-sacrificing implant, mainly dislocations and polyethylene wear and tear.

Background: Expandable distal femur endoprosthesis (EDFE) is commonly used to compensate for the loss of the distal femoral epiphyseal plate in skeletally immature children who have undergone surgical resection of bone malignancies. However, the effect of the passive tibial component of the EDFE on tibial growth has not been extensively studied in the literature. This study aims to delineate the type, frequency, and associated risk factors of multiplanar proximal tibial deformities in skeletally immature children following the use of the expandable distal femur endoprosthesis (EDFE). Moreover, we plan to detect how these deformities influence the long-term functionality of the endoprosthesis in defining the need for subsequent implant revision or further surgical management. Patients and Methods: A total of 20 patients aged (7–12) years underwent expandable distal femur replacement. Two types of implants were used: Juvenile Tumor System (JTS) non-invasive prosthesis in 14 patients, and Modular Universal Tumor and Revision System (MUTARS)^® Xpand Growing Prostheses in six patients. A scanogram and CT scan documented the measurements of longitudinal and multiplanar growth as leg length discrepancy (LLD), femur length discrepancy (FLD), tibia length discrepancy (TLD), and the yield values of rotational, sagittal, and coronal deformities of the tibia. The patients were followed up to assess the need for further management. Sex, age, size of tibial plate perforation, and type of implant used were studied for possible correlation with deformities or growth disturbance. Results: The patients were followed up for a mean of 3 (2–7) years. A total of 14 patients, (10 JTS, 4 implant cast) had a tibial deformity and/or growth disturbance. A single patient was found to have all deformities (growth, rotational, coronal, and sagittal). Fourteen patients were found to have an LLD ranging from 5.3 to 59 mm (median 21 mm), 12 had a TLD from 3 to 30 mm, (median 10 mm), and 11 patients showed evidence of malrotation from 6 to 32 degrees (median 11 degrees). TLD was found to contribute entirely to LLD in three patients, and >50% of LLDs in seven patients. All LLDs were treated conservatively, except in three patients; two received contralateral tibia epiphysiodesis and one received revision with a new implant. A single patient had a posterior tibia slope angle (PTSA) of −2.8 degrees, and three patients had a coronal deformity with a mean medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA) of 80.3 (77–83 degrees). Conclusions: Tibial growth disturbance and multiplanar deformities occur in the majority of patients following EDFE replacement, exacerbating LLD. Yet, these disturbances may be well tolerated, managed conservatively, and rarely mandate endoprosthetic revision or subsequent corrective surgery. Age at the time of surgery was found to be the only significant contributor to the development of tibia growth disturbance.

To assess the impact of delay in local control on survival outcomes of Ewing sarcoma (ES) patients. The cornerstone of therapy of localized ES includes chemotherapy and local control with surgery or radiotherapy. We sought to assess the impact of delay (>15 weeks) in timing of local control on survival outcomes of ES patients. Data of consecutive patients with primary non-metastatic ES of the extremities, treated at a single institution were collected. The impact of delay of timing for local control, demographics, and disease characteristics on overall survival (OS) was analyzed. A total of 43 patients with ES of the extremity were included. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Local control was by surgery in 36 patients and definitive radiation in 7. A total of 16 patients had delay in local control. At a median follow of up of 48 months, patients with delay in local control had significantly inferior OS compared to those with optimal local control timing (5-year OS 56% vs. 80%, respectively, p = 0.044). Other factors that predicted inferior OS included definitive radiation as opposed to definitive surgery (5-year OS 25% vs. 79%, respectively, p = 0.041) and tumor necrosis <90% as opposed to ≥90% (5-year OS 55% vs. 90%, respectively, p = 0.01). Delay in definitive therapy, local control with radiation as opposed to surgery and poor post-chemotherapy tumor necrosis predict inferior OS in ES. Adopting strategies to minimize delay in local control could improve survival outcomes.

Different classification systems for surgical tumor resections in the proximal humerus and scapula have been described, but none are specific or have been recently revised. The purpose of this article is to report modified surgical techniques and a new classification system for resections in the humerus and scapula. Thirty-two patients with shoulder girdle bone tumors were operated upon. Two separate new classifications were assigned to resections in the humerus (types I–IV) and scapula (types I–III). An annotation is added to signify deltoid preservation (A) or sacrifice (B). Modified surgical techniques were devised. For extra-articular resections of the proximal humerus, we show that sacrificing the acromion and coracoid process is not required. Preservation of these structures can improve cosmetic shoulder outcome. For tumors with no large medial component, we show that there is no need to detach the muscle attachment from the coracoid process allowing earlier elbow extension postoperatively. After a mean follow-up period of 46 months, only two patients developed local recurrence. Postoperative infection was seen in two and stem loosening in one patient. The average MSTS functional score for all patients was 83%. Our modified surgical techniques saved structures which were unnecessarily resected with no advantage in surgical series. We reserved the integrity of more muscular tissues and attachments leading to less restriction during the rehabilitation process. This new classification system is realistic, easy to implement, and applicable to all patients.