Acute kidney injury is a common clinical disorder and one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in the postoperative period. In this study, the safety and efficacy of autologous mitochondrial transplantation by intra-arterial injection for renal protection in a swine model of bilateral renal ischemia-reperfusion injury were investigated. Female Yorkshire pigs underwent percutaneous bilateral temporary occlusion of the renal arteries with balloon catheters. Following 60 min of ischemia, the balloon catheters were deflated and animals received either autologous mitochondria suspended in vehicle or vehicle alone, delivered as a single bolus to the renal arteries. The injected mitochondria were rapidly taken up by the kidney and were distributed throughout the tubular epithelium of the cortex and medulla. There were no safety-related issues detected with mitochondrial transplantation. Following 24 h of reperfusion, estimated glomerular filtration rate and urine output were significantly increased while serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen were significantly decreased in swine that received mitochondria compared with those that received vehicle. Gross anatomy, histopathological analysis, acute tubular necrosis scoring, and transmission electron microscopy showed that the renal cortex of the vehicle-treated group had extensive coagulative necrosis of primarily proximal tubules, while the mitochondrial transplanted kidney showed only patchy mild acute tubular injury. Renal cortex IL-6 expression was significantly increased in vehicle-treated kidneys compared with the kidneys that received mitochondrial transplantation. These results demonstrate that mitochondrial transplantation by intra-arterial injection provides renal protection from ischemia-reperfusion injury, significantly enhancing renal function and reducing renal damage.

OBJECTIVES: Type 2 diabetes causes mitochondrial dysfunction, which increases myocardial susceptibility to ischaemia–reperfusion injury. We investigated the efficacy of transplantation of mitochondria isolated from diabetic or non-diabetic donors in providing cardioprotection from warm global ischaemia and reperfusion in the diabetic rat heart.METHODS: Ex vivo perfused hearts from Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF fa/fa) rats (n = 6 per group) were subjected to 30 min of warm global ischaemia and 120 min reperfusion. Immediately prior to reperfusion, vehicle alone (VEH) or vehicle containing mitochondria isolated from either ZDF (MTZDF) or non-diabetic Zucker lean (ZL +/?) (MTZL) skeletal muscle were delivered to the coronary arteries via the aortic cannula.RESULTS: Following 30-min global ischaemia and 120-min reperfusion, left ventricular developed pressure was significantly increased in MTZDF and MTZL groups compared to VEH group (MTZDF: 92.8 ± 5.2 mmHg vs MTZL: 110.7 ± 2.4 mmHg vs VEH: 44.3 ± 5.9 mmHg; P < 0.01 each); and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was significantly decreased (MTZDF 12.1 ± 1.3 mmHg vs MTZL 8.6 ± 0.8 mmHg vs VEH: 18.6 ± 1.5 mmHg; P = 0.016 for MTZDF vs VEH and P < 0.01 for MTZL vs VEH). Total tissue ATP content was significantly increased in both MT groups compared to VEH group (MTZDF: 18.9 ± 1.5 mmol/mg protein/mg tissue vs MTZL: 28.1 ± 2.3 mmol/mg protein/mg tissue vs VEH: 13.1 ± 0.5 mmol/mg protein/mg tissue; P = 0.018 for MTZDF vs VEH and P < 0.01 for MTZL vs VEH). Infarct size was significantly decreased in the MT groups (MTZDF: 11.8 ± 0.7% vs MTZL: 9.9 ± 0.5% vs VEH: 52.0 ± 1.4%; P < 0.01 each).CONCLUSIONS: Mitochondrial transplantation significantly enhances post-ischaemic myocardial functional recovery and significantly decreases myocellular injury in the diabetic heart.

Background: Although studies demonstrate its feasibility, there is ongoing debate on the short and long-term outcomes of MitraClip versus surgical repair or mitral valve replacement (MVR). The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare the safety, morbidity, mortality and long-term function following MitraClip compared to MVR. Methods: Articles were searched in PubMed and Cochrane databases for studies comparing outcomes of MitraClip and surgery on December 1, 2019. Eligible prospective, retrospective, randomized and non-randomized studies were reviewed. Results: A total of nine studies (n=1,873, MitraClip =533, MVR =644) were eligible for review. At baseline, MitraClip patients had more comorbidities than MVR patients, including myocardial infarction (P<0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P=0.022) and chronic kidney disease (P<0.001). MitraClip was associated with shorter length of stay (–3.86 days; 95% CI, –4.73 to –2.99; P<0.01) with a similar safety profile. Residual moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation was more frequent in MitraClip at discharge (OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.39–5.69; P<0.01) and at five years (OR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.54–3.94; P<0.01), and there was a higher need for reoperation on the MitraClip group at latest follow-up (OR, 5.28; 95% CI, 3.43–8.11; P<0.01). The overall mortality was comparable between the two groups (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 0.98–4.29; P=0.06) for a mean follow-up of 4.8 years. Conclusions: Compared to surgery, MitraClip demonstrates a similar safety profile and shorter length of stay in high-risk patients, at the expense of increased residual mitral regurgitation and higher reoperation rate. Despite this, long term mortality appears comparable between the two techniques, suggesting that a patient-tailored approach will lead to optimal results.