Laura Maritza Cardenas

Dr. Laura Maritza Cardenas

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2019 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LCLaura Maritza Cardenas
Laura Maritza Cardenas
ABA. Bhogal
A. Bhogal
DCD.R. Chadwick
D.R. Chadwick
KMK. McGeough
K. McGeough
TMThomas H. Misselbrook
Thomas H. Misselbrook
SCS. Calvet
S. Calvet
Intensification of grasslands is necessary to meet the increasing demand of livestock products. The application of nitrogen (N) on grasslands affects the N balance therefore the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). Emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O) are produced due to N fertilisation and low NUE. These emissions depend on the type and rates of N applied. In this study we have compiled data from 5 UK N fertilised grassland sites (Crichton, Drayton, North Wyke, Hillsborough and Pwllpeiran) covering a range of soil types and climates. The experiments evaluated the effect of increasing rates of inorganic N fertiliser provided as ammonium nitrate (AN) or calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN). The following fertiliser strategies were also explored for a rate of 320 kg N ha-1: using the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD), changing to urea as an N source and splitting fertiliser applications. We measured N2O emissions for a full year in each experiment, as well as soil mineral N, climate data, pasture yield and N offtake. N2O emissions were greater at Crichton and North Wyke whereas Drayton, Hillsborough and Pwllpeiran had the smallest emissions. The resulting average emission factor (EF) of 1.12% total N applied showed a range of values for all the sites between 0.6 and 2.08%. NUE depended on the site and for an application rate of 320 kg N ha-1, N surplus was on average higher than 80 kg N ha-1, which is proposed as a maximum by the EU Nitrogen Expert Panel. N2O emissions tended to be lower when urea was applied instead of AN or CAN, and were particularly reduced when using urea with DCD. Finally, correlations between the factors studied showed that total N input was related to Nofftake and Nexcess; while cumulative emissions and EF were related to yield scaled emissions.

16 July 2020 in Journal of Environmental Quality
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAlice F. Charteris
Alice F. Charteris
DCDave Chadwick
Dave Chadwick
RTRachel E. Thorman
Rachel E. Thorman
AVAntonio Vallejo
Antonio Vallejo
CKCecile A.M. de Klein
Cecile A.M. de Klein
LCLaura Maritza Cardenas
Laura Maritza Cardenas
Adequately estimating soil nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions using static chambers is challenging due to the high spatial variability and episodic nature of these fluxes. We discuss how to design experiments using static chambers to better account for this variability and reduce the uncertainty of N2O emission estimates. This paper is part of a series, each discussing different facets of N2O chamber methodology. Aspects of experimental design and sampling affected by spatial variability include site selection and chamber layout, size, and areal coverage. Where used, treatment application adds a further level of spatial variability. Time of day, frequency, and duration of sampling (both individual chamber closure and overall experiment duration) affect the temporal variability captured. We also present best practice recommendations for chamber installation and sampling protocols to reduce further uncertainty. To obtain the best N2O emission estimates, resources should be allocated to minimize the overall uncertainty in line with experiment objectives. Sometimes this will mean prioritizing individual flux measurements and increasing their accuracy and precision by, for example, collecting four or more headspace samples during each chamber closure. However, where N2O fluxes are exceptionally spatially variable (e.g., in heterogeneous agricultural landscapes, such as uneven and woody grazed pastures), using available resources to deploy more chambers with fewer headspace samples per chamber may be beneficial. Similarly, for particularly episodic N2O fluxes, generated for example by irrigation or freeze–thaw cycles, increasing chamber sampling frequency will improve the accuracy and reduce the uncertainty of temporally interpolated N2O fluxes.

11 April 2021 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
M. Jordana RiveroM. Jordana Rivero
M. Jordana Rivero
PGPatricia Grau-Campanario
Patricia Grau-Campanario
SMSiobhan Mullan
Siobhan Mullan
SHSuzanne D Held
Suzanne D Held
Jessica StokesJessica Stokes
Jessica Stokes
LCLaura Maritza Cardenas
Laura Maritza Cardenas
Understanding the behaviour of grazing animals at pasture is crucial in order to develop management strategies that will increase the potential productivity of grazing systems and simultaneously decrease the negative impact on the environment. The objective of this review was to summarize and analyse the scientific literature that has addressed the site use preference of grazing cattle using global positioning systems (GPS) collars in the past 21 years (2000–2020) to aid the development of more sustainable grazing livestock systems. The 84 studies identified were undertaken in several regions of the world, in diverse production systems, under different climate conditions and with varied methodologies and animal types. This work presents the information in categories according to the main findings reviewed, covering management, external and animal factors driving animal movement patterns. The results showed that some variables, such as stocking rate, water and shade location, weather conditions and pasture (terrain and vegetation) characteristics, have a significant impact on the behaviour of grazing cattle. Other types of bio-loggers can be deployed in grazing ruminants to gain insights into their metabolism and its relationship with the landscape they utilise. Changing management practices based on these findings could improve the use of grasslands towards more sustainable and productive livestock systems.

1 May 2019 in Geoderma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CXCong Xu
Cong Xu
XHXiao Han
Xiao Han
SRShuhua Ru
Shuhua Ru
LCLaura Maritza Cardenas
Laura Maritza Cardenas
RRRobert Martin Rees
Robert Martin Rees
FMFanqiao Meng
Fanqiao Meng

1 October 2021 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSaoirse Cummins
Saoirse Cummins
JFJohn A. Finn
John A. Finn
KRKarl G Richards
Karl G Richards
GLGary J. Lanigan
Gary J. Lanigan
GGGuylain Grange
Guylain Grange
DKDominika Krol
Dominika Krol

1 November 2016 in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LCLaura Maritza Cardenas
Laura Maritza Cardenas
TMThomas H. Misselbrook
Thomas H. Misselbrook
CHC. Hodgson
C. Hodgson
NDN. Donovan
N. Donovan
SGS. Gilhespy
S. Gilhespy
DCD. Chadwick
D. Chadwick
• N2O EFs from urine deposition to grassland are larger if applied in spring. • Meta-analysis showed a significant effect of season and not of treatment on the N2O EFs. • Methane emissions were larger from the dung application compared to urine. • CH4 totals were significantly different across seasons (lowest in spring). • CH4 totals were not significantly different between treatments.