Purpose: To assess the current feasibility of online hyperthermia treatment planning guided steering (HGS) and its current contribution to treatment quality in deep hyperthermia for locally advanced cervical cancer. Materials and methods: 36 patients were randomized to receive either their second and fourth (arm A) or their third and fifth (arm B) hyperthermia treatment of the series with the aid of HGS. The other treatments were conducted according to the Rotterdam Empirical Steering Guidelines (RESG). Results: During period I (second and third treatment of the series) similar results were found for HGS and RESG with a slight, non-significant difference found in favour of HGS. The average temperature T50 was 40.3°C for both (p = 0.409) and the dose parameter CEM43T90 was 0.64 for RESG and 0.63 for HGS (p = 0.154). However, during period II (fourth and fifth treatment of the series) HGS performed less well, with significant lower thermal dose parameters, minimum, mean and maximum intraluminal temperatures, tolerance measures and net integrated power. T50 was 40.4°C after RESG and 40°C after HGS (p = 0.001) and CEM43T90 0.57 and 0.38 (p = 0.01) respectively. Conclusion: We found that the procedure of online treatment planning guided steering is feasible. For maximal exploitation of its possibilities, however, better control and understanding of several patient, tumour and technical parameters is required. This study has been very helpful in identifying some of the challenges and flaws that warrant further investigation in the near future, such as patient positioning and the prevention of hotspot-related complaints.

Hyperthermia treatments in the clinic rely on accurate temperature measurements to guide treatments and evaluate clinical outcome. Currently, magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) is the only clinical option to non-invasively measure 3D temperature distributions. In this review, we evaluate the status quo and emerging approaches in this evolving technology for replacing conventional dosimetry based on intraluminal or invasively placed probes. First, we define standardized MRT performance thresholds, aiming at facilitating transparency in this field when comparing MR temperature mapping performance for the various scenarios that hyperthermia is currently applied in the clinic. This is based upon our clinical experience of treating nearly 4000 patients with superficial and deep hyperthermia. Second, we perform a systematic literature review, assessing MRT performance in (I) clinical and (II) pre-clinical papers. From (I) we identify the current clinical status of MRT, including the problems faced and from (II) we extract promising new techniques with the potential to accelerate progress. From (I) we found that the basic requirements for MRT during hyperthermia in the clinic are largely met for regions without motion, for example extremities. In more challenging regions (abdomen and thorax), progress has been stagnating after the clinical introduction of MRT-guided hyperthermia over 20 years ago. One clear difficulty for advancement is that performance is not or not uniformly reported, but also that studies often omit important details regarding their approach. Motion was found to be the common main issue hindering accurate MRT. Based on (II), we reported and highlighted promising developments to tackle the issues resulting from motion (directly or indirectly), including new developments as well as optimization of already existing strategies. Combined, these may have the potential to facilitate improvement in MRT in the form of more stable and reliable measurements via better stability and accuracy.

Clinical outcome of hyperthermia depends on the achieved target temperature, therefore target conformal heating is essential. Currently, invasive temperature probe measurements are the gold standard for temperature monitoring, however, they only provide limited sparse data. In contrast, magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) provides unique capabilities to non-invasively measure the 3D-temperature. This study investigates MRT accuracy for MR-hyperthermia hybrid systems located at five European institutions while heating a centric or eccentric target in anthropomorphic phantoms with pelvic and spine structures. Scatter plots, root mean square error (RMSE) and Bland–Altman analysis were used to quantify accuracy of MRT compared to high resistance thermistor probe measurements. For all institutions, a linear relation between MRT and thermistor probes measurements was found with R² (mean ± standard deviation) of 0.97 ± 0.03 and 0.97 ± 0.02, respectively for centric and eccentric heating targets. The RMSE was found to be 0.52 ± 0.31 °C and 0.30 ± 0.20 °C, respectively. The Bland-Altman evaluation showed a mean difference of 0.46 ± 0.20 °C and 0.13 ± 0.08 °C, respectively. This first multi-institutional evaluation of MR-hyperthermia hybrid systems indicates comparable device performance and good agreement between MRT and thermistor probes measurements. This forms the basis to standardize treatments in multi-institution studies of MR-guided hyperthermia and to elucidate thermal dose-effect relations.