Monica Malta

Dr. Monica Malta

1. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Toronto, ON M6J 1H4, Canada
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2010 in Revista de Saúde Pública
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Monica MaltaMonica Malta
Monica Malta
LCLeticia Oliveira Cardoso
Leticia Oliveira Cardoso
FBFrancisco Inacio Bastos
Francisco Inacio Bastos
MMMonica Maria Ferreira Magnanini
Monica Maria Ferreira Magnanini
CSCosme Marcelo Furtado Passos da Silva
Cosme Marcelo Furtado Passos da Silva
Freqüentemente, a descrição de pesquisas de natureza observacional é inadequada, dificultando a avaliação de seus pontos fracos e fortes e, em conseqüência, a generalização de seus resultados. A iniciativa denominada Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE), formulou uma lista de verificação que contém 22 itens, denominada STROBE Statement ("Declaração STROBE"), com recomendações sobre o que deveria ser incluído em uma descrição mais precisa e completa de estudos observacionais. Entre junho e dezembro de 2008, um grupo de pesquisadores brasileiros dedicou-se à tradução e adaptação da "Declaração STROBE" para o português. O objetivo do estudo foi apresentar a tradução para o português, bem como introduzir a discussão sobre o contexto de utilização, as potencialidades e limitações da Iniciativa STROBE.

15 July 2008 in Addiction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Monica MaltaMonica Malta
Monica Malta
Steffanie StrathdeeSteffanie Strathdee
Steffanie Strathdee
MMMonica M. F. Magnanini
Monica M. F. Magnanini
FBFrancisco I. Bastos
Francisco I. Bastos

20 November 2008 in AIDS and Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Monica MaltaMonica Malta
Monica Malta
MMMonica M. F. Magnanini
Monica M. F. Magnanini
Steffanie StrathdeeSteffanie Strathdee
Steffanie Strathdee
FBFrancisco I. Bastos
Francisco I. Bastos

31 December 2019 in PLOS Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Monica MaltaMonica Malta
Monica Malta
TVThepikaa Varatharajan
Thepikaa Varatharajan
CRCayley Russell
Cayley Russell
MPMichelle Pang
Michelle Pang
SBSarah Bonato
Sarah Bonato
BFBenedikt Fischer
Benedikt Fischer
Worldwide opioid-related overdose has become a major public health crisis. People with opioid use disorder (OUD) are overrepresented in the criminal justice system and at higher risk for opioid-related mortality. However, correctional facilities frequently adopt an abstinence-only approach, seldom offering the gold standard opioid agonist treatment (OAT) to incarcerated persons with OUD. In an attempt to inform adequate management of OUD among incarcerated persons, we conducted a systematic review of opioid-related interventions delivered before, during, and after incarceration. We systematically reviewed 8 electronic databases for original, peer-reviewed literature published between January 2008 and October 2019. Our review included studies conducted among adult participants with OUD who were incarcerated or recently released into the community (≤90 days post-incarceration). The search identified 2,356 articles, 46 of which met the inclusion criteria based on assessments by 2 independent reviewers. Thirty studies were conducted in North America, 9 in Europe, and 7 in Asia/Oceania. The systematic review included 22 randomized control trials (RCTs), 3 non-randomized clinical trials, and 21 observational studies. Eight observational studies utilized administrative data and included large sample sizes (median of 10,419 [range 2273–131,472] participants), and 13 observational studies utilized primary data, with a median of 140 (range 27–960) participants. RCTs and non-randomized clinical trials included a median of 198 (range 15–1,557) and 44 (range 27–382) participants, respectively. Twelve studies included only men, 1 study included only women, and in the remaining 33 studies, the percentage of women was below 30%. The majority of study participants were middle-aged adults (36–55 years). Participants treated at a correctional facility with methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) or buprenorphine (BPN)/naloxone (NLX) had lower rates of illicit opioid use, had higher adherence to OUD treatment, were less likely to be re-incarcerated, and were more likely to be working 1 year post-incarceration. Participants who received MMT or BPN/NLX while incarcerated had fewer nonfatal overdoses and lower mortality. The main limitation of our systematic review is the high heterogeneity of studies (different designs, settings, populations, treatments, and outcomes), precluding a meta-analysis. Other study limitations include the insufficient data about incarcerated women with OUD, and the lack of information about incarcerated populations with OUD who are not included in published research. In this carefully conducted systematic review, we found that correctional facilities should scale up OAT among incarcerated persons with OUD. The strategy is likely to decrease opioid-related overdose and mortality, reduce opioid use and other risky behaviors during and after incarceration, and improve retention in addiction treatment after prison release. Immediate OAT after prison release and additional preventive strategies such as the distribution of NLX kits to at-risk individuals upon release greatly decrease the occurrence of opioid-related overdose and mortality. In an effort to mitigate the impact of the opioid-related overdose crisis, it is crucial to scale up OAT and opioid-related overdose prevention strategies (e.g., NLX) within a continuum of treatment before, during, and after incarceration.

22 March 2019 in AIDS and Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LMLuiz Montenegro
Luiz Montenegro
LVLuciane Velasque
Luciane Velasque
SLSara LeGrand
Sara LeGrand
KWKathryn Whetten
Kathryn Whetten
RRRicardo de Mattos Russo Rafael
Ricardo de Mattos Russo Rafael
Monica MaltaMonica Malta
Monica Malta

7 June 2010 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Monica MaltaMonica Malta
Monica Malta
MMMonica Mf Magnanini
Monica Mf Magnanini
MMMaeve B Mello
Maeve B Mello
APAna Roberta P Pascom
Ana Roberta P Pascom
YLYohana Linhares
Yohana Linhares
FBFrancisco I Bastos
Francisco I Bastos
The Brazilian response towards AIDS epidemic is well known, but the absence of a systematic review of vulnerable populations ─ men who have sex with men (MSM), female sex workers (FSW), and drug users (DU) remains a main gap in the available literature. Our goal was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing HIV prevalence among MSM, FSW and DU, calculating a combined pooled prevalence and summarizing factors associated the pooled prevalence for each group.