Complications from diabetic retinopathy such as diabetic macular edema (DME) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) constitute leading causes of preventable vision loss in working-age patients. Since vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a major role in the pathogenesis of these complications, VEGF inhibitors have been the cornerstone of their treatment. Anti-VEGF monotherapy is an effective but burdensome treatment for DME. However, due to the intensive and burdensome treatment, most patients in routine clinical practice are undertreated, and therefore, their outcomes are compromised. Even in adequately treated patients, persistent DME is reported anywhere from 30% to 60% depending on the drug used. PDR is currently treated by anti-VEGF, panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) or a combination of both. Similarly, a number of eyes, despite these treatments, continue to progress to tractional retinal detachment and vitreous hemorrhage. Clearly there are other molecular pathways other than VEGF involved in the pathogenesis of DME and PDR. One of these pathways is the angiopoietin–Tie signaling pathway. Angiopoietin 1 (Ang1) plays a major role in maintaining vascular quiescence and stability. It acts as a molecular brake against vascular destabilization and inflammation that is usually promoted by angiopoietin 2 (Ang2). Several pathological conditions including chronic hyperglycemia lead to Ang2 upregulation. Recent regulatory approval of the bi-specific antibody, faricimab, may improve long term outcomes in DME. It targets both the Ang/Tie and VEGF pathways. The YOSEMITE and RHINE were multicenter, double-masked, randomized non-inferiority phase 3 clinical trials that compared faricimab to aflibercept in eyes with center-involved DME. At 12 months of follow-up, faricimab demonstrated non-inferior vision gains, improved anatomic outcomes and a potential for extended dosing when compared to aflibercept. The 2-year results of the YOSEMITE and RHINE trials demonstrated that the anatomic and functional results obtained at the 1 year follow-up were maintained. Short term outcomes of previously treated and treatment-naive eyes with DME that were treated with faricimab during routine clinical practice suggest a beneficial effect of faricimab over other agents. Targeting of Ang2 has been reported by several other means including VE-PTP inhibitors, integrin binding peptide and surrobodies.

To evaluate interval between primary cancer diagnosis and uveal metastasis and assess survival outcomes based on whether the primary cancer was diagnosed before or after uveal metastasis. In this retrospective analysis, all patients with uveal metastasis evaluated on the Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA between February 1, 1974 and June 1, 2017 were included. Features and outcomes based on timing of primary cancer diagnosis, whether before or after diagnosis of uveal metastasis, were assessed. A total of 2214 uveal metastases were diagnosed in 1310 eyes of 1111 consecutive patients. Primary cancer was known prior to uveal metastasis in 742 patients (67%) and not known in 369 (33%). Of those not known, the primary cancer was later found in 192 patients (17%) and never found in 177 patients (16%). For those with known primary cancer, mean interval from primary cancer diagnosis to uveal metastasis was 5.2 years with differences in primary sites of gastrointestinal (2.1 years, p = 0.003), lung (2.2 years, p < 0.001), breast (6.5 years, p < 0.001), and thyroid (13 years, p < 0.001). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 5-year overall survival showed no difference between patients with primary cancer found before (28%) vs after (20%) vs never found (33%), relative to uveal metastasis. Of 1111 patients with uveal metastasis, early-onset uveal metastases were found with lung and gastrointestinal tract cancers, whereas late-onset metastases were found with breast and thyroid cancers. Overall survival did not vary on whether the primary tumor was diagnosed before, after, or never found, relative to uveal metastasis.

Purpose: To evaluate clinical features and survival outcomes of uveal metastasis based on patient age. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all patients with uveal metastasis evaluated on the Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA between February 1, 1974 and June 1, 2017. The features and outcomes were analyzed based on patient age classified as children (0–20 years), young adults (21–40 years), middle [aged] adults (41–60 years), older adults (61–80 years) and senior adults (81–100 years). Results: There were 1111 consecutive patients, including children (n = 3, <1%), young adults (n = 77, 7%), middle adults (n = 472, 42%), older adults (n = 509, 46%), and senior adults (n = 50, 4%). At uveal metastasis diagnosis, demographics included mean patient age of 60 years, Caucasian race (88%), and female gender (64%). Compared to the largest cohort (older adults), there were significant differences (age group versus [vs.] older adults) in Caucasian race (senior adult 98% vs. 89%, p = 0.042), male sex (young adults: 22% vs. 43%, p < 0.001) (middle adults: 29% vs. 43%, p < 0.001), unilateral tumor (young adult: 70% vs. 86%, p < 0.001) (middle adult: 79% vs. 86%, p = 0.003) (senior adults: 96% vs. 86%, p = 0.045), and cancer origin in breast (young adults: 51% vs. 32%, p = 0.002) (middle adults: 44% vs 32%, p < 0.001), lung (young adults: 14% vs. 30%, p = 0.004), kidney (young adults: 0% vs. 5%, p = 0.043), prostate (middle adults: 1% vs. 4%, p = 0.001), gastrointestinal tract (senior adults: 8% vs. 2%, p = 0.028), and others (children: 100% vs. 4%, p < 0.001) (young adults: 10% vs. 4%, p = 0.044). Kaplan-Meier survival (children, young, middle, older, and senior adults) at 1 year was 33%, 48%, 60%, 62%, and 76% and at 5 years was 0%, 22%, 29%, 25%, and 40%, respectively, with no difference per age category. The mean overall survival was 17.2 months and children demonstrated hazard ratio (HR) for death at 1 year of 2.1 relative to older adults. Conclusion: Uveal metastasis is found in all age groups. Compared to older adults, primary cancer site was more often breast and less likely lung in young and middle adults. Other rare sites were more often seen in children. Survival outcomes at 1 and 5 years were most favorable for senior adults and least favorable for children.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term, real-world outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for complications of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. A retrospective review involving 64 patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy that underwent PPV in their worse-seeing eye were followed for a minimum of 8 years. The fellow eye underwent conventional treatment. Patients were divided into two groups by age: patients younger than 50 years of age and patients older than 50. In the younger than 50 group, 89% of vitrectomized eyes had improved visual acuity (VA) while 3.6% had decreased VA. A total of 14% of vitrectomized eyes required additional laser and 11% required reoperations. In the conventional treatment eyes, 25% had improved VA while 68% had decreased VA (p < 0.05). A total of 72% required additional laser and 60% required PPV. In the older than 50 group, 86% of vitrectomized eyes had VA improvement and 3% had decreased VA. A total of 8% required laser and 8% required reoperations. In the conventional treatment eyes, 30% improved VA and 48% had decreased VA (p < 0.05). Additional procedures required included laser in 70% and PPV in 17%. In both age groups, eyes that underwent PPV had better final visual outcomes than eyes that received conventional treatment for PDR.