Raouf Mobasheri

Dr. Raouf Mobasheri

Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering, Department of Smart Systems and Energies, JUNIA Graduate School of Engineering, 13 Rue De Toul, CEDEX, BP41290 59014 Lille, France
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2012 in International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Raouf MobasheriRaouf Mobasheri
Raouf Mobasheri
ZPZhijun Peng
Zhijun Peng
SMSeyed Mostafa Mirsalim
Seyed Mostafa Mirsalim

1 January 2018 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Raouf MobasheriRaouf Mobasheri
Raouf Mobasheri
MSMahdi Seddiq
Mahdi Seddiq
ZPZhijun Peng
Zhijun Peng

26 April 2022 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XLXiang Li
Xiang Li
DLDayou Li
Dayou Li
JLJingyin Liu
Jingyin Liu
TATahmina Ajmal
Tahmina Ajmal
AAAbdel Aitouche
Abdel Aitouche
ZPZhijun Peng
Zhijun Peng

16 April 2012 in SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
PDF file
Raouf MobasheriRaouf Mobasheri
Raouf Mobasheri
ZPZhijun Peng
Zhijun Peng
An investigation has been carried out to examine the influence of re-entrant combustion chamber geometry on mixture preparation, combustion process and engine performance in a high-speed direct injection (HSDI) four valves 2.0L Ford diesel engine by CFD modeling. The computed cylinder pressure, heat release rate and soot and NOx emissions were firstly compared with experimental data and good agreement between the predicted and experimental values was ensured the accuracy of the numerical predictions collected with the present work. Three ITs (Injection Timing) at 2.65° BTDC, 0.65° BTDC and 1.35° ATDC, all with 30 crank angle pilot separations were also considered to identify the optimum IT for achieving the minimum amount of pollutant emissions. In order to investigate the effect of combustion chamber, thirteen different types of combustion chamber configurations have been considered based on four categories including piston bowl depth, piston bowl width, and piston bottom surface and lip area. For all the studied cases, compression ratio, squish bowl volume and the amount of injected fuel were kept constant to avoid that the effects of changes in chamber geometry be masked by the effect of other engine parameters. The results confirmed that the combustion chamber geometry has significant effects on the combustion process. It showed that by changing the design of the piston crown, the amount of emission pollutants can be decreased while the other performance parameters of engine remain constant.

1 April 2013 in Computers & Fluids
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Raouf MobasheriRaouf Mobasheri
Raouf Mobasheri
ZPZhijun Peng
Zhijun Peng

10 September 2012 in SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
PDF file
Raouf MobasheriRaouf Mobasheri
Raouf Mobasheri
ZPZhijun Peng
Zhijun Peng
Effects of included spray angle with different injection strategies on combustion characteristics, performance and amount of pollutant emission have been computationally investigated in a common rail heavy-duty DI diesel engine. The CFD model was firstly validated with experimental data achieved from a Caterpillar 3401 diesel engine for a conventional part load condition at 1600 rev/min. Three different included spray angles (α = 145°, 105°, 90°) were studied in comparison with the traditional spray injection angle (α = 125°). The results show that spray targeting is very effective for controlling the in-cylinder mixture distributions especially when it accompanied with various injection strategies. It was found that 105° spray cone angle along with an optimized split pre- and post-Top Dead Center (TDC) injection strategy could significantly reduce NOx and soot emissions without much penalty of the fuel consumption, as compared to the wide spray angle. In addition, a narrow injection angle offers more efficient air-mixing process due to better interaction with the combustion chamber and cylinder liner.