José-Ignacio Antón

Dr. José-Ignacio Antón

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 March 2011 in Socio-Economic Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RBRafael Muñoz de Bustillo
Rafael Muñoz de Bustillo
EFEnrique Fernández-Macías
Enrique Fernández-Macías
FEFernando Esteve
Fernando Esteve
JAJosé-Ignacio Antón
José-Ignacio Antón
In recent years, there has been growing concern in Europe about the lack of an established comparable measure of job quality to complement the widely accepted quantitative indicators in the formulation and evaluation of European employment policies. The aim of this paper is to offer a guided tour around the different views and existing proposals of job quality indicators, mainly from a European perspective. First, we discuss the methodological decisions that have to be made in the process of designing an indicator of job quality, from both a theoretical and methodological/technical perspective. Second, these arguments are used to discuss critically the different empirical approaches to the measurement of job quality proposed in the literature. We finish by presenting some recommendations for the construction of a job quality index for policy purposes.

1 June 2010 in International Migration Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JAJosé-Ignacio Antón
José-Ignacio Antón

1 September 2021 in Structural Change and Economic Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EFEnrique Fernández-Macías
Enrique Fernández-Macías
DKDavid Klenert
David Klenert
JAJosé-Ignacio Antón
José-Ignacio Antón

8 December 2022 in Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JAJosé-Ignacio Antón
José-Ignacio Antón
EFEnrique Fernández‐Macías
Enrique Fernández‐Macías
RWRudolf Winter‐Ebmer
Rudolf Winter‐Ebmer
Whereas there are recent papers on the effect of robot adoption on employment and wages, there is no evidence on how robots affect non‐monetary working conditions. We explore the impact of robot adoption on several domains of non‐monetary working conditions in Europe over the period 1995–2005 combining information from the World Robotics Survey and the European Working Conditions Survey. In order to deal with the possible endogeneity of robot deployment, we employ an instrumental variables strategy, using the robot exposure by sector in other developed countries as an instrument. Our results indicate that robotization has a negative impact on the quality of work in the dimension of work intensity and no relevant impact on the domains of physical environment or skills and discretion.

7 November 2009 in The European Journal of Health Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JAJosé-Ignacio Antón
José-Ignacio Antón
RBRafael Muñoz de Bustillo
Rafael Muñoz de Bustillo

24 February 2022 in European Journal of Industrial Relations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JAJosé-Ignacio Antón
José-Ignacio Antón
DKDavid Klenert
David Klenert
EFEnrique Fernández-Macías
Enrique Fernández-Macías
MBMaria Cesira Urzì Brancati
Maria Cesira Urzì Brancati
GAGeorgios Alaveras
Georgios Alaveras
This paper explores the impact of robot adoption on European regional labour markets between 1995 and 2015. Specifically, we look at the effect of the usage of industrial robots on jobs and employment structures across European regions. Our estimates suggest that the effect of robots on employment tends to be mostly small and negative during the period 1995–2005 and positive during the period 2005–2015 for the majority of model specifications. Regarding the effects on employment structures, we find some evidence of a mildly polarising effect in the first period, but this finding depends to some extent on the model specifications. In sum, this paper shows that the impact of robots on European labour markets in the last couple of decades has been ambiguous and is not robust. The strength and even the sign of this effect are sensitive to the specifications, as well as to the countries and periods analysed.