Background: Sepsis is triggered by an infection and represents one of the greatest challenges of modern intensive care medicine. With regard to a targeted antimicrobial treatment strategy, the earliest possible pathogen detection is of crucial importance. Until now, culture-based detection methods represent the diagnostic gold standard, although they are characterized by numerous limitations. Culture-independent molecular diagnostic procedures represent a promising alternative. In particular, the plasmatic detection of circulating, cell-free DNA by next-generation sequencing (NGS) has shown to be suitable for identifying disease-causing pathogens in patients with bloodstream infections. Methods: The DigiSep-Trial is a randomized, controlled, interventional, open-label, multicenter trial characterizing the effect of the combination of NGS-based digital precision diagnostics with standard-of-care microbiological analyses compared to solely standard-of-care microbiological analyses in the clinical picture of sepsis/septic shock. Additional anti-infective expert consultations are provided for both study groups. In 410 patients (n = 205 per arm) with sepsis/septic shock, the study examines whether the so-called DOOR-RADAR (Desirability of Outcome Ranking/Response Adjusted for Duration of Antibiotic Risk) score (representing a combined endpoint including the criteria (1) intensive/intermediate care unit length of stay, (2) consumption of antibiotics, (3) mortality, and (4) acute kidney injury (AKI)) can be improved by an additional NGS-based diagnostic concept. We also aim to investigate the cost-effectiveness of this new diagnostic procedure. It is postulated that intensive/intermediate care unit length of stay, mortality rate, incidence of AKI, the duration of antimicrobial therapy as well as the costs caused by complications and outpatient aftercare can be reduced. Moreover, a significant improvement in patient’s quality of life is expected. Discussion: The authors´ previous work suggests that NGS-based diagnostics have a higher specificity and sensitivity compared to standard-of-care microbiological analyses for detecting bloodstream infections. In combination with the here presented DigiSep-Trial, this work provides the optimal basis to establish a new NGS-driven concept as part of the national standard based on the best possible evidence. Trial registrations: DRKS-ID DRKS00022782. Registered on August 25, 2020 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04571801. Registered October 1, 2020

Infections with SARS-CoV-2 spread worldwide early in 2020. In previous winters, we had been treating patients with seasonal influenza. While creating a larger impact on the health care systems, comparisons regarding the intensive care unit (ICU) courses of both diseases are lacking. We compared patients with influenza and SARS-CoV-2 infections treated at a tertiary care facility offering treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and being a high-volume facility for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Patients with COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic (n = 64) were compared to 64 patients with severe influenza from 2016 to 2020 at our ICU. All patients were treated using a standardized protocol. ECMO was used in cases of severe ARDS. Both groups had similar comorbidities. Time in ICU and mortality were not significantly different, yet mortality with ECMO was high amongst COVID-19 patients with approximately two-thirds not surviving. This is in contrast to a mortality of less than 40% in influenza patients with ECMO. Mortality was higher than estimated by SAPSII score on admission in both groups. Patients with COVID-19 were more likely to be male and non-smokers than those with influenza. The outcomes for patients with severe disease were similar. The study helps to understand similarities and differences between patients treated for severe influenza infections and COVID-19.

A biomarker for risk stratification and disease severity assessment in SARS-CoV-2 infections has not yet been established. Point of care testing (POCT) of butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) enables early detection of systemic inflammatory responses and correlates with disease severity in sepsis and burns. In acute care or resource-limited settings, POCT facilitates rapid clinical decision making, a particularly beneficial aspect in the management of pandemic situations. In this prospective observational study, POCT-measured BChE activity was assessed in 52 critically ill COVID-19 patients within 24 h of ICU admission and on the third and seventh day after ICU admission. Forty (77%) of these patients required venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO). In critically ill COVID-19 patients, BChE activity is significantly decreased compared with healthy subjects, but also compared with other inflammatory conditions such as sepsis, burns, or trauma. POCT BChE activity reflects the severity of organ dysfunction and allows prediction of 28-day mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Implementing early POCT BChE measurement could facilitate risk stratification and support admission and transfer decisions in resource-limited settings.

Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) is a non-invasive technology that provides information on biochemical tissue properties, including skin oxygenation and perfusion quality. Microcirculatory alterations are associated with organ dysfunction in septic COVID-19 patients. This prospective observational study investigated associations between skin HSI and organ dysfunction severity in critically ill COVID-19 patients. During the first seven days in the ICU, palmar HSI measurements were carried out with the TIVITA^® tissue system. We report data from 52 critically ill COVID-19 patients, of whom 40 required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). HSI parameters for superficial tissue oxygenation (StO₂) and oxygenation and perfusion quality (NPI) were persistently decreased. Hemoglobin tissue content (THI) increased, and tissue water content (TWI) was persistently elevated. Regression analysis showed strong indications for an association of NPI and weaker indications for associations of StO₂, THI, and TWI with sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scoring. StO₂ and NPI demonstrated negative associations with vasopressor support and lactate levels as well as positive associations with arterial oxygen saturation. These results suggest that skin HSI provides clinically relevant information, opening new perspectives for microcirculatory monitoring in critical care.

Superinfections with Aspergillus spp. in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (CAPA: COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis) are increasing. Dexamethasone has shown beneficial effects in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Whether dexamethasone increases the risk of CAPA has not been studied exclusively. Moreover, this retrospective study aimed to identify risk factors for a worse outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Data from 231 critically ill COVID-19 patients with or without dexamethasone treatment from March 2020 and March 2021 were retrospectively analysed. Only 4/169 (6.5%) in the DEXA-group and 13/62 (7.7%) in the Non-DEXA group were diagnosed with probable CAPA (p = 0.749). Accordingly, dexamethasone was not identified as a risk factor for CAPA. Moreover, CAPA was not identified as an independent risk factor for death in multivariable analysis (p = 0.361). In contrast, elevated disease severity (as assessed by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA]-score) and the need for organ support (kidney replacement therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]) were significantly associated with a worse outcome. Therefore, COVID-19 treatment with dexamethasone did not increase the risk for CAPA. Moreover, adequately treated CAPA did not represent an independent risk factor for mortality. Accordingly, CAPA might reflect patients’ severe disease state instead of directly influencing outcome.