Ruth Mae McLeod

Ms. Ruth Mae McLeod

University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 January 2023 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ruth Mae McLeodRuth Mae McLeod
Ruth Mae McLeod
TRTed Rosenrkantz
Ted Rosenrkantz
RFRoslyn Holly Fitch
Roslyn Holly Fitch
RKRachel R. Koski
Rachel R. Koski
Preterm infants are often treated with caffeine as a respiratory stimulant. However, follow-up data shows caffeine may also have neuroprotective potential. There are several theories as to how caffeine might protect the brain, but none have been proven. This study looked at caffeine effects on microglial activation in rodent brains post hypoxic ischemic (HI) injury. Rat pups underwent either sham or HI surgery on P6, followed by treatment with either caffeine or saline. Forty-eight hours post-injury, brains were collected and underwent paraffin embedding and sectioning followed by immunofluorescence staining. Ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba-1) was used to label microglia, and 4′,6-diamindino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) was used to label DNA. Cell size measurements of microglia were obtained to gauge microglia activation, and chromatin condensation (DAPI optical density) was used as an index of neuronal cell death. Results suggest that caffeine does offer protective effects, based on significantly increased levels of cell death in HI-saline animals not seen in caffeine-treated HI males and females. However, the mechanism of action may be different. Male HI animals showed marginally reduced microglial activation following caffeine treatment, whereas females did not. Results indicate that though caffeine may act protectively in both sexes by reducing cell death, the benefits may be mediated by different mechanisms.

28 September 2022 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ruth Mae McLeodRuth Mae McLeod
Ruth Mae McLeod
TRTed Rosenrkantz
Ted Rosenrkantz
RFRoslyn Holly Fitch
Roslyn Holly Fitch
Infants born prematurely have an increased risk of experiencing brain injury, specifically injury caused by Hypoxia Ischemia (HI). There is no approved treatment for preterm infants, in contrast to term infants that experience Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) and can be treated with hypothermia. Given this increased risk and lack of approved treatment, it is imperative to explore and model potential treatments in animal models of preterm injury. Hypothermia is one potential treatment, though cooling to current clinical standards has been found to be detrimental for preterm infants. However, mild hypothermia may prove useful. Caffeine is another treatment that is already used in preterm infants to treat apnea of prematurity, and has shown neuroprotective effects. Both of these treatments show sex differences in behavioral outcomes and neuroprotective effects, which are critical to explore when working to translate from animal to human. The effects and research history of hypothermia, caffeine and how sex affects these treatment outcomes will be explored further in this review article.

24 July 2024 in Developmental Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ruth Mae McLeodRuth Mae McLeod
Ruth Mae McLeod
TRTed S. Rosenkrantz
Ted S. Rosenkrantz
RFR. Holly Fitch
R. Holly Fitch
Introduction: Caffeine and theophylline are methylxanthines and non-selective adenosine antagonists commonly used to treat apnea of prematurity. Both human and animal data suggest that xanthines also have clinically important long-term neuroprotective effects in the presence of inflammation in the perinatal period as seen following hypoxic-ischemic brain insults. Moreover, these protective effects appear to be more robust when administered shortly (< 48 hrs) after preterm birth. Method: To evaluate the importance of the post-delivery therapeutic window, we collected and analyzed medical data from preterm infants meeting criteria (23 – 30 weeks gestational age (GA)), born at the University of Connecticut Health Center (UCHC) and cared for at the UCHC/Connecticut Children’s Medical Center (CCMC) NICU from 1991 – 2017 (n=858). Eighteen-month follow-up data included cognitive and language scores from the Neonatal Neurodevelopmental Follow-Up Clinic records, with a retention of 81% of subjects (n=696). Differences were analyzed via multivariate ANOVA and ANCOVA. Results: Analyses showed that infants who received xanthine treatment within the first 48 hours after preterm birth showed significantly better 18-month behavioral outcomes than those treated later than 48 hours, despite a lack of a priori differences in GA, birth, or length of stay. The positive effect of early xanthine therapy was particularly robust for infants exposed prenatally to the inflammatory conditions of chorioamnionitis and/or preeclampsia. Conclusions: Current findings are consistent with human and animal data showing that caffeine exerts protective effects, at least in part via attenuation of inflammation. Results add to the evidence supporting routine immediate prophylactic neuroprotective xanthine therapy (i.e., caffeine) in preterm infants. Findings also add important new evidence of the augmented value of caffeine specifically for infants with inflammatory risk including mothers with pre-eclampsia or chorioamnionitis.

7 February 2024 in Pharmaceuticals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ruth Mae McLeodRuth Mae McLeod
Ruth Mae McLeod
TRTed Rosenrkantz
Ted Rosenrkantz
RFRoslyn Holly Fitch
Roslyn Holly Fitch
Magnesium sulfate (MagSul) is used clinically to prevent eclamptic seizures during pregnancy and as a tocolytic for preterm labor. More recently, it has been implicated as offering neural protection in utero for at-risk infants. However, evidence is mixed. Some studies found that MagSul reduced the incidence of cerebral palsy (CP) but did not improve other measures of neurologic function. Others did not find any improvement in outcomes. Inconsistencies in the literature may reflect the fact that sex effects are largely ignored, despite evidence that MagSul shows sex effects in animal models of neonatal brain injury. The current study used retrospective infant data to assess differences in developmental outcomes as a function of sex and MagSul treatment. We found that on 18-month neurodevelopmental cognitive and language measures, preterm males treated with MagSul (n = 209) had significantly worse scores than their untreated counterparts (n = 135; p < 0.05). Female preterm infants treated with MagSul (n = 220), on the other hand, showed a cognitive benefit relative to untreated females (n = 123; p < 0.05). No significant effects of MagSul were seen among females on language (p > 0.05). These results have tremendous implications for risk–benefit considerations in the ongoing use of MagSul and may explain why benefits have been hard to identify in clinical trials when sex is not considered.