Sympathetic activation has been long appreciated exclusively as a fundamental compensatory mechanism of the failing heart and, thus, welcome and to be supported. In the initial clinical phases of heart failure (HF), the sympathetic nervous system overdrive plays a compensatory function aimed at maintaining an adequate cardiac output despite the inotropic dysfunction affecting the myocardium. However, when the sympathetic reflex response is exaggerated it triggers a sequence of unfavourable remodelling processes causing a further contractile deterioration that unleashes major adverse cardiovascular consequences, favouring the HF progression and the occurrence of fatal events. Eventually, the sympathetic nervous system in HF was demonstrated to be a ‘lethality factor’ and thus became a prominent therapeutic target. The existence of an effective highly specialized intracardiac neuronal network immediately rules out the old concept that sympathetic activation in HF is merely the consequence of a drop in cardiac output. When a cardiac damage occurs, such as myocardial ischaemia or a primary myocardial disorder, the adaptive capability of the system may be overcame, leading to excessive sympatho-excitation coupled with attenuation till to abolishment of central parasympathetic drive. Myocardial infarction causes, within a very short time, both a functional and anatomical remodelling with a diffuse up-regulation of nerve growth factor (NGF). The subsequent nerve sprouting signal, facilitated by a rise in the levels of NGF in the left stellate ganglion and in the serum, triggers an increase in cardiac nerve density in both peri-infarct and non-infarcted areas. Finally, NFG production decreases over time, supposedly as an adaptative response to the prolonged exposure to sympathetic overactivity, leading in the end to a reduction in sympathetic nerve density. Accordingly, NGF levels were markedly reduced in patients with severe congestive heart failure. The kidney is the other key player of the sympathetic response to HF as it indeed reacts to under-perfusion and to loop diuretics to preserve filtration at the cost of many pathological consequences on its physiology. This vicious loop ultimately participates to the chronic and disruptive sympathetic overdrive. In conclusion, sympathetic activation is the natural physiological consequence to life stressors but also to any condition that may harm our body. It is the first system of reaction to any potential life-threatening event. However, in any aspect of life over reaction is never effective but, in many instances, is, actually, life threatening. One for all is the case of ischaemia-related ventricular fibrillation which is, strongly facilitated by sympathetic hyperactivity. The take home message? When, in a condition of harm, everybody is yelling failure is just around the corner.

The liver is not the exclusive site of glucose production in humans in the postabsorptive state. Robust data support that the kidney is capable of gluconeogenesis and studies have demonstrated that renal glucose production can increase systemic glucose production. The kidney has a role in maintaining glucose body balance, not only as an organ for gluconeogenesis but by using glucose as a metabolic substrate. The kidneys reabsorb filtered glucose through the sodium‐glucose cotransporters sodium‐glucose cotransporter (SGLT) 1 and SGLT2, which are localized on the brush border membrane of the early proximal tubule with immune detection of their expression in the tubularized Bowman capsule. In patients with diabetes mellitus, the renal maximum glucose reabsorptive capacity, and the threshold for glucose passage into the urine, are higher and contribute to the hyperglycemic state. The administration of SGLT2 inhibitors to patients with diabetes mellitus enhances sodium and glucose excretion, leading to a reduction of the glycosuria threshold and tubular maximal transport of glucose. The net effects of SGLT2 inhibition are to drive a reduction in plasma glucose levels, improving insulin secretion and sensitivity. The benefit of SGLT2 inhibitors goes beyond glycemic control, since inhibition of renal glucose reabsorption affects blood pressure and improves the hemodynamic profile and the tubule glomerular feedback. This action acts to rebalance the dense macula response by restoring adenosine production and restraining renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone activation. By improving renal and cardiovascular function, we explain the impressive reduction in adverse outcomes associated with heart failure supporting the current clinical perspective.

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a clinical condition characterized by large pathophysiology heterogeneity with lack of effective therapies as proven by the disappointing results generated by randomized controlled trials. The innovative therapeutic concept provided by sacubitril–valsartan, a molecule combining angiotensin receptor blocking agent and neprilysin inhibitor has suggested the hypothesis it would have led to a reduced risk of hospitalization for HF or death from cardiovascular causes among patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction. The PARAGON-HF (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01920711) investigated HF subjects class II to IV HF, ejection fraction of 45% or higher, elevated level of natriuretic peptides, and structural heart disease to receive sacubitril–valsartan (target dose, 97 mg of sacubitril with 103 mg of valsartan twice daily) or valsartan (target dose, 160 mg twice daily). The trial missed the primary outcome of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization (HFH) in the overall study population. A subgroup analysis addressed significant decrease of HFH in subjects with left ventricular ejection fraction below the median 57% value in the study. The data were consistent with previous post hoc analysis performed in studies where candesartan and spironolactone were investigated in HFpEF. Those results open the door to investigate angiotensin aldosterone and peptidases inhibition efficacy in the unexplored HF middle range ejection fraction, currently lacking of valid evidence.

Background: Over the last years, several trials offered new evidence on heart failure (HF) treatment.Design and results: For HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, type 2 sodium—glucose cotransporter inhibitors, aside from sacubitril—valsartan, demonstrated extraordinary efficacy in ameliorating patients' prognosis. Some new molecules (eg vericiguat, omecamtiv mecarbil and ferric carboxymaltose) correct iron deficiency and have shown to be capable of furthering reducing the burden of HF hospitalisation. Finally, there is new evidence on the possible therapeutic approaches of HF patients with mid‐range or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.Conclusions: This review aimed to revise the main novelties in the field of HF therapy and focus on how the daily clinical approach to patient treatment is changing.

Large clinical studies conducted with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction have demonstrated their ability to achieve both cardiac and kidney benefits. Although there is huge evidence on SGLT2i-mediated clinical benefits both in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying their efficacy are still poorly understood. Some favorable mechanisms are likely due to the prompt glycosuric action which is associated with natriuretic effects leading to hemodynamic benefits as well as a reduction in glomerular hyperfiltration and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation. In addition to the renal mechanisms, SGLT2i may play a relevant role in cardiorenal axis protection by improving the cardiomyocyte metabolism, by exerting anti-fibrotic and anti-inflammatory actions, and by increasing cardioprotective adipokine expression. New studies will be needed to better understand the specific molecular mechanisms that mediate the SGLT2i favorable effects in patients suffering diabetes. Our aim is to first discuss about the molecular mechanisms underlying the cardiovascular benefits of SGLT2i in each of the main organs involved in the cardiorenal axis. Furthermore, we update on the most recent clinical trials evaluating the beneficial effects of SGLT2i in treatment of both diabetic and non-diabetic patients suffering heart failure.