Objective: To summarize and evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) and compare its safety and efficacy with open radical nephrectomy (ORN) in pediatric renal tumors (RT) and Wilms’ tumors (WT). Background: ORN is the gold standard treatment for pediatric RT, consisting predominantly of WT. LRN is gaining popularity but remains controversial in pediatric surgical oncology. Methods: A systematic search was performed for all eligible studies on LRN and comparative studies between LRN and ORN in pediatric RT and WT. Meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, and sensitivity analysis were conducted. The main endpoints were cancer-related outcomes and surgical morbidity. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed. Results: No levels I to II studies were identified. LRN was feasible in nearly 1 in 5 pediatric RT and WT after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with pooled mid-term oncological outcomes (90% event-free survival) comparable with those of ORN. There was no strong evidence of an increased risk of intraoperative tumor spillage, but lymph node harvest was inadequate in LRN. Large tumors crossing the ipsilateral spinal border were associated with a trend for intraoperative complications and positive margins. Pooled complications rate and hospital stay duration were similar between LRN and ORN. Long-term (>3 years) outcomes are unknown. Conclusions: Available level III evidence indicates that LRN is a safe alternative to ORN for carefully selected cases, with similar spillage rates and mid-term oncological outcomes. However, there was no advantage in surgical morbidity and lymph node harvest was inadequate with LRN. Tumor-matched–group studies with long-term follow-up are required. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Treatment of pilonidal sinus disease with conventional excision techniques is associated with recurrence up to 20 to 30% (primary closure) or with prolonged healing that might last months (closure by secondary intention). Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT) is gaining increasing popularity. This systematic review aims to summarize and evaluate the reported outcomes of pediatric EPSiT (PEPSiT) to date. Systematic search was performed for all studies on PEPSiT in patients younger than 18 years, pertaining to demographics, technique, and outcomes. Fisher's test was used to assess the associations between success/recurrence rates and different approaches (fistuloscope vs. cystoscope, different wound care protocols). A total of 320 patients (9 studies, 2018–2022) with a weighted mean age of 15.7 years and follow-up duration of 13.5 months were included. PEPSiT was successful in 290 patients (90.9%) with weighted mean time to healing of 4.1 weeks. Recurrence was reported in 29 patients (9.1%) with weighted mean time to recurrence of 4.6 months. Outcomes were not significantly altered by the use of fistuloscope versus pediatric cystoscope (p = 1.0), or with perioperative laser epilation (p = 0.06), or postoperative regular shaving, depilatory creams, light pulse, or laser (p = 0.31). The weighted mean operative time was 38 minutes and hospital stay was 16 hours. Summary of available evidence confirms that PEPSiT is safe and effective. Added to its noninvasiveness, PEPSiT's pooled outcomes appear superior to those of numerous conventional techniques. Comparison with conventional techniques, particularly off-midline flap and semi-closure procedures, is, however, lacking. The superiority of PEPSiT needs to be confirmed in future comparative studies, including cost–benefit analysis.