Oleg Mariev

Dr. Oleg Mariev


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 July 2024 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mirzat UllahMirzat Ullah
Mirzat Ullah
MUMuhammad Umair
Muhammad Umair
KSKazi Sohag
Kazi Sohag
OMOleg Mariev
Oleg Mariev
Muhammad Asif KhanMuhammad Asif Khan
Muhammad Asif Khan
Hafiz M. SohailHafiz M. Sohail
Hafiz M. Sohail

15 December 2022 in Resources Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MIMonirul Islam
Monirul Islam
KSKazi Sohag
Kazi Sohag
OMOleg Mariev
Oleg Mariev

1 May 2022 in Borsa Istanbul Review
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KSKazi Sohag
Kazi Sohag
AGAnna Gainetdinova
Anna Gainetdinova
OMOleg Mariev
Oleg Mariev

21 May 2021 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KSKazi Sohag
Kazi Sohag
OMOleg Mariev
Oleg Mariev
NDNatalia Davidson
Natalia Davidson

25 November 2023 in Environment, Development and Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SAShujaat Abbas
Shujaat Abbas
SGSudeshna Ghosh
Sudeshna Ghosh
SSSanhita Sucharita
Sanhita Sucharita
BDBuhari Doğan
Buhari Doğan
ODOsman Değer
Osman Değer
OMOleg Mariev
Oleg Mariev

10 September 2018 in Foresight-Russia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NDNatalia Davidson
Natalia Davidson
OMOleg Mariev
Oleg Mariev
APAndrey Pushkarev
Andrey Pushkarev
In this paper, we analyze the impact of externalities on firms’ capacity to develop and implement innovations. We evaluate a Probit model containing both firm level factors and regional factors, such as the institutional environment, state support, and human capital. The dependent variable is a dummy variable reflecting the involvement of a firm in innovation activity. We employ data provided by BEEPS 2012-2014 for firm-level indicators and data provided by the Russian Federal State Statistics Service for region level indicators. The results confirm that at present the most important external factors affecting the innovation activity of Russian firms are state support, both at the firm level and at the regional level, economic situation in the region, institutions, and quality of human capital. At the same time, we found several factors such as political stability, tax policy, and investment risks to be insignificant. These results require further analysis. We also found that the impact of the factors mentioned above depends on whether a region receives state support. The results imply that a differentiated policy that considers regional characteristics will probably be more effective than a uniform policy on innovation.