Background: Retrograde type A aortic dissection ( RTAD ) is a potentially lethal complication after thoracic endovascular aortic repair ( TEVAR ). However, data are limited regarding the development of RTAD post‐ TEVAR . This systematic review aims to define the incidence, mortality, and potential risk factors of RTAD post‐ TEVAR . Methods and Results: Multiple electronic searches were performed. Fifty publications with a total of 8969 patients were analyzed. Pooled estimates for incidence and mortality of RTAD were 2.5% (95% confidence interval [ CI] , 2.0–3.1) and 37.1% (95% CI , 23.7–51.6), respectively. Metaregression analysis evidenced that RTAD rate was associated with hypertension ( P =0.043), history of vascular surgery ( P =0.042), and American Surgical Association ( P =0.044). The relative risk of RTAD was 1.81 (95% CI, 1.04–3.14) for acute dissection (relative to chronic dissection) and 5.33 (95% CI, 2.70–10.51) for aortic dissection (relative to a degenerative aneurysm). Incidence of RTAD was significantly different in patients with proximal bare stent and nonbare stent endografts (relative risk [RR] =2.06; 95% CI, 1.22–3.50). RTAD occurrence rate in zone 0 was higher than other landing zones. Conclusions: The pooled RTAD rate after TEVAR was calculated at 2.5% with a high mortality rate (37.1%). Incidence of RTAD is significantly more frequent in patients treated for dissection than those with an aneurysm (especially for acute dissection), and when the proximal bare stent was used. Rate of RTAD after TEVAR varied significantly according to the proximal Ishimaru landing zone. The more‐experienced centers tend to have lower RTAD incidences.

Purpose: To find a suitable rate of thoracic stent-graft oversizing by exploring its association with the occurrence of retrograde type A dissection (RTAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection. Methods: From January 2013 to June 2014, 203 patients (mean age 55 years; 167 men) with type B aortic dissection underwent TEVAR. The mean rate of oversizing at the proximal landing zone was 10% (range 0%–32%). Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on the degree of oversizing: ≤5% (n=105, mean 1.2%±1.5%) and >5% (n=98, mean 18.5%±2.8%). TEVAR-related complications, including RTAD, stent migration, and type I endoleaks, were analyzed. Results: There were no significant differences in the preoperative proximal landing zone diameters between the groups (31.1 mm for the ≤5% group vs 31.8 mm for the >5% group, p=0.229). The incidence of type I endoleaks over a mean follow-up 15.1±6.4 months was 5.4% [6 (5.7%) in the ≤5% group vs 5 (5.1%) in the >5% group, p=0.847]. The stent migration rate was low in both groups (1% vs 2%, respectively; p=0.521). The occurrence of RTAD [0 in the ≤5% group vs 11 (11.2%) in the >5% group] was significantly associated with the rate of oversizing (p<0.001). Conclusion: The early and midterm outcomes of this study demonstrate that ≤5% oversizing may be a suitable option for thoracic endografts used to treat type B dissection. The smaller rate of oversizing can lower the incidence of RTAD without increasing stent migration or type I endoleak rates.

Purpose: To evaluate the midterm outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) using chimney grafts (ch-TEVAR) or thoracic stent-grafts with fenestrations made on the back table (f-TEVAR) to treat thoracic aortic dissection (TAD) and thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 474 consecutive patients (mean age 62.3±10.7 years; 346 men) treated with either f-TEVAR (n=110) or ch-TEVAR (n=364) for 352 TADs (81 f-TEVAR and 271 ch-TEVAR) or 122 TAAs (29 f-TEVAR and 93 ch-TEVAR) from 2008 to 2016. The primary endpoints at 30 days and during follow-up were overall mortality, aorta-related mortality, and major complications. The secondary endpoints were endoleak and reintervention. The patency of the target branches, cost of hospitalization, and the use of antiplatelet drugs were also analyzed. Results: Intraoperative type I endoleaks were treated in 69 (14.6%) cases (4 f-TEVAR and 65 ch-TEVAR, p<0.01) to achieve 100% technical success. Four (0.8%) patients died within 30 days [1 (0.9%) f-TEVAR and 3 (0.8%) ch-TEVAR]. Perioperative cerebral ischemia (1 fatal stroke) occurred in 9 (1.9%) patients: (1 f-TEVAR and 8 ch-TEVAR, p=0.39). During the mean follow-up of 50.6±20.0 months (49.5±18.3 months in f-TEVAR and 50.9±20.6 months in ch-TEVAR), 11 (2.3%) patients died of an aorta-related event. Type I endoleak was present in 40 (8.4%) patients (1 f-TEVAR and 39 ch-TEVAR, p<0.01). Eleven (2.3%) patients experienced stent-graft migration and 13 (2.7%) had a retrograde dissection. One hundred (16.9%) of the 593 branch stents occluded (4/75 in the f-TEVAR group and 96/518 in the ch-TEVAR group, p<0.01). The branch reintervention rate was 7.2% (34/474). The f-TEVAR group had a significantly higher probability of freedom from branch occlusion (92%) than the ch-TEVAR group (83%, p=0.007). Conclusion: Off-the-shelf techniques employing chimney grafts and homemade fenestrations are both suitable options for TAD and TAA involving the supra-aortic branches, with a low incidence of reintervention. Fenestrated TEVAR seems to have more favorable short- and midterm outcomes. Further study of these off-the-shelf techniques for aortic arch repair is warranted.

As an emerging field, telesurgery robotic system is changing the traditional medical mode and can delivery remote surgical treatment anywhere in the world. Advances in telesurgery robotic technology achieve the remote control beyond the current limitation of distance and special medical environment. This review introduces the development history, the current status and the potential in future of the telesurgery robotic system. In addition, it presents the construction of control platform and the application, especially in trauma treatment, as well as the challenge in clinic.