To analyze the outcomes of j-pouch and side-to-end anastomosis in rectal cancer patients treated with laparoscopic hand-assisted low anterior resection. Prospective trial on cases randomized to have a colonic j-pouch or a side-to-end anastomosis after low anterior resection. Demographics, characteristics of disease and treatment, perioperative results, and functional outcomes and life quality were compared between the groups. Seventy four patients were randomized. Reservoir creation was withdrawn in 17 (23%) patients, mostly related to reach problem (n = 11, 64.7%). Anastomotic leakage rate was significantly higher in j-pouch group (8 [27.6%] vs. 0, p = 0.004). Stoma closure could not be achieved in 16 (28.1%) patients. Life quality and functional outcomes, measured 4, 8 and 12 months after the stoma reversal, were similar. Colonic j-pouch and side-to-end anastomosis are similar regarding perioperative measures including operation time, rates of postoperative complications, reoperation and 30-day mortality, and hospitalization period except anastomotic leak rate, which is higher in j-pouch group. Postoperative aspects are not different in patients receiving either technique including functional outcomes and life quality for the first year after stoma closure. In our opinion, both techniques may be preferred during the daily practice while performing laparoscopic surgery; but surgeons may be aware of a possibly higher anastomotic leak rate in case of a j-pouch.

Introduction: Natural orifice surgery has been increasingly used in colon surgery since the early 2000s. However, it is rarely used for total colectomy. In this study, we aimed to retrospectively compare natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) with transabdominal specimen extraction in patients undergoing laparoscopic total colectomy. Materials and Methods: Twenty-six patients who underwent laparoscopic total colectomy between 2013 and 2017 were enrolled and the patients were divided into two groups: NOSE ( n = 13) and transabdominal group ( n = 13). The patients' demographic characteristics, perioperative and postoperative outcomes, pathology results, visual analog scale scores, and cosmetic scores were compared. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics as well as perioperative and postoperative outcomes, including complications. Benign pathologies were more common in the NOSE group (85% versus 15%, P = .001). The pain scores of the postoperative first, second, and third days were significantly lower in the NOSE group 4.1 ± 2.1 versus 7.1 ± 1.3 ( P = .005), 3.7 ± 2.2 versus 6.0 ± 1.5 ( P = .003), and 2.2 ± 2.0 versus 4.1 ± 0.9 ( P = .03), respectively. As expected, the mean cosmetic score was significantly better in the NOSE group (8.3 ± 1.5 versus 6.7 ± 1.8, P = .02). Conclusion: NOSE combined with laparoscopic total colectomy provided better patient comfort in benign diseases and small-sized malignant diseases.

Background: Splenectomy impacts hematological, immunological, and metabolic functions of the patient. Since our understanding of its metabolic effects, in particular effects on lipid metabolism, is limited, this study aims to investigate the effects of splenectomy on lipid metabolism. Methods: The data from 316 patients undergoing splenectomy between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-eight patients whose serum lipid values were measured both preoperatively and 1 year after surgery were included in this study. Results: Significantly higher levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) lipid profile were found in the postsplenectomy measurements. However, no significant differences were recorded in levels of triglyceride, HDL, or very-LDL. Conclusion: We determined that splenectomy does impact lipid metabolism, and that the metabolic effects of splenectomy should further be investigated.