Patrick Turko

Dr. Patrick Turko

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2021 in Cancer Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EREgle Ramelyte
Egle Ramelyte
ATAizhan Tastanova
Aizhan Tastanova
ZBZsolt Balázs
Zsolt Balázs
DIDesislava Ignatova
Desislava Ignatova
PTPatrick Turko
Patrick Turko
Reinhard DummerReinhard Dummer
Reinhard Dummer

22 March 2023 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OEOssia M. Eichhoff
Ossia M. Eichhoff
CSCorinne I. Stoffel
Corinne I. Stoffel
JKJan Käsler
Jan Käsler
LBLuzia Briker
Luzia Briker
PTPatrick Turko
Patrick Turko
MLMitchell Levesque
Mitchell Levesque
Clinical management of melanomas with NRAS mutations is challenging. Targeting MAPK signaling is only beneficial to a small subset of patients due to resistance that arises through genetic, transcriptional, and metabolic adaptation. Identification of targetable vulnerabilities in NRAS-mutated melanoma could help improve patient treatment. Here, we used multiomics analyses to reveal that NRAS-mutated melanoma cells adopt a mesenchymal phenotype with a quiescent metabolic program to resist cellular stress induced by MEK inhibition. The metabolic alterations elevated baseline reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, leading these cells to become highly sensitive to ROS induction. In vivo xenograft experiments and single-cell RNA sequencing demonstrated that intratumor heterogeneity necessitates the combination of a ROS inducer and a MEK inhibitor to inhibit both tumor growth and metastasis. Ex vivo pharmacoscopy of 62 human metastatic melanomas confirmed that MEK inhibitor–resistant tumors significantly benefited from the combination therapy. Finally, oxidative stress response and translational suppression corresponded with ROS-inducer sensitivity in 486 cancer cell lines, independent of cancer type. These findings link transcriptional plasticity to a metabolic phenotype that can be inhibited by ROS inducers in melanoma and other cancers. Significance: Metabolic reprogramming in drug-resistant NRAS-mutated melanoma cells confers sensitivity to ROS induction, which suppresses tumor growth and metastasis in combination with MAPK pathway inhibitors.

10 March 2016 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BDBogdan Drugă
Bogdan Drugă
PTPatrick Turko
Patrick Turko
PSPiet Spaak
Piet Spaak
FPFrancesco Pomati
Francesco Pomati

1 June 2021 in The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADAndreas Dzung
Andreas Dzung
PCPhil Cheng
Phil Cheng
CSCorinne Stoffel
Corinne Stoffel
ATAizhan Tastanova
Aizhan Tastanova
PTPatrick Turko
Patrick Turko
PBPhilipp P. Bosshard
Philipp P. Bosshard

18 April 2023 in Molecular Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MLMarlene Langenbach
Marlene Langenbach
SGSophie Giesler
Sophie Giesler
SRStefan Richtsfeld
Stefan Richtsfeld
SCSara Costa-Pereira
Sara Costa-Pereira
LRLukas Rindlisbacher
Lukas Rindlisbacher
RZRobert Zeiser
Robert Zeiser
The treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) leads to impressive response rates but primary and secondary resistance to ICI reduces progression-free survival. Novel strategies that interfere with resistance mechanisms are key to further improve patient outcome during ICI therapy. P53 is often inactivated by mouse-double-minute-2 (MDM2), which may decrease immunogenicity of melanoma cells. We analyzed primary patient-derived melanoma cell lines, performed bulk sequencing analysis of patient-derived melanoma samples, and used melanoma mouse models to investigate the role of MDM2-inhibition for enhanced ICI therapy. We found increased expression of IL15 and MHC-II in murine melanoma cells upon p53 induction by MDM2-inhibition. MDM2-inhibitor induced MHC-II and IL15-production, which was p53 dependent as Tp53 knockdown blocked the effect. Lack of IL15-receptor in hematopoietic cells or IL15 neutralization reduced the MDM2-inhibition/p53-induction–mediated antitumor immunity. P53 induction by MDM2-inhibition caused anti-melanoma immune memory as T cells isolated from MDM2-inhibitor–treated melanoma-bearing mice exhibited anti-melanoma activity in secondary melanoma-bearing mice. In patient-derived melanoma cells p53 induction by MDM2-inhibition increased IL15 and MHC-II. IL15 and CIITA expressions were associated with a more favorable prognosis in patients bearing WT but not TP53-mutated melanoma. Implications: MDM2-inhibition represents a novel strategy to enhance IL15 and MHC-II–production, which disrupts the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. On the basis of our findings, a clinical trial combining MDM2-inhibition with anti–PD-1 immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma is planned.

25 June 2021 in Genes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMelike Ak
Melike Ak
Abdullah KahramanAbdullah Kahraman
Abdullah Kahraman
FAFabian M. Arnold
Fabian M. Arnold
PTPatrick Turko
Patrick Turko
MLMitchell Levesque
Mitchell Levesque
Reinhard DummerReinhard Dummer
Reinhard Dummer
Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) and pleomorphic dermal sarcoma (PDS) are rare tumors developing in chronically sun-exposed skin. Clinicopathological features are similar, but they differ in prognosis, while PDS has a more aggressive course with a higher risk for local recurrence and metastases. In current clinical practice, they are diagnosed by exclusion using immunohistochemistry. Thus, stringent diagnostic criteria and correct differentiation are critical in management and treatment for optimal outcomes. This retrospective single-center study collected clinicopathological data and tumor samples of 10 AFX and 18 PDS. Extracted genomic DNA from tumor specimens was analyzed by a next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform (FoundationOne-CDx™). Among 65 identified mutations, TP53 inactivating mutations were observed in all tumor specimens. In both AFX and PDS, the known pathogenic gene alterations in CDKN2A, TERT promoter, and NOTCH1 were frequently present, along with high mutational burden and stable Micro-Satellite Instability status. The mutational profiles differed only in ASXL1, which was only present in AFX. Further differences were identified in likely pathogenic and unknown gene alterations. Similarities in their genomic signatures could help to distinguish them from other malignancies, but they are not distinguishable between each other using the FoundationOne-CDx™ NGS panel. Therefore, histological criteria to determine diagnosis remain valid. For further insight, performing deep tumor profiling may be necessary.