The COVID-19 pandemic illustrated that intolerance of uncertainty (IU) can hinder problem-solving and lead to avoidance of ambiguous situations. Furthermore, people tend to lack confidence in decisions made in ambiguous contexts. We wanted to investigate the impact of IU on intentions to get vaccinated, to vaccinate one’s children, and to recommend the vaccine in situations with varying degrees of perceived uncertainty. We first conducted a pretest to select six scenarios with different levels of perceived uncertainty. In the core study, 485 participants answered for each of the six scenarios whether they would get vaccinated, vaccinate their children (or imagine doing so, for individuals without children), and whether they would recommend the vaccine. They also completed the IUS-12 (Intolerance of Uncertainty scale) and the VAX (Vaccination Attitudes Examination). Results showed that perceived uncertainty did not influence our measures, but the IUS-12 and VAX predicted the difference in score between the most and least uncertain scenarios. An indirect effect of the IUS-12 on decision confidence through the VAX was found, but with no direct effect. We conclude that, even if future studies should refine these results, Public Policies should be more focused on factors such as IU and attitudes toward vaccination.

Mistrust in COVID-19 vaccines may hinder vaccination campaigns. We looked at cognitive determinants of vaccination intentions against COVID-19. We were interested in (i) the effects of stress and (ii) the effects of self-protection systems on attitudes and intentions to get COVID-19 vaccines. We conducted an online observational pilot study with 203 participants and used self-report questionnaires to assess perceived stress and vulnerability to disease, beliefs about a dangerous world, pandemic-related stressors, living conditions, attitudes and intentions toward the vaccines and trust in government management of the COVID-19 pandemic. The participants reporting high levels of trust in government and high levels of stress were more likely to have positive attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines, although these two effects are at least partially independent of each other. We discuss how to improve the communication around COVID-19 vaccine policies.

Face aux problématiques persistantes d’insertion professionnelle en France, de nombreux dispositifs ont été mis en place. Ces dispositifs reposent notamment de plus en plus sur des outils numériques, malheureusement encore trop peu nombreux. Parmi eux, l’outil Diagoriente s’impose comme un outil novateur et complet, permettant de faire le point sur les compétences transversales et d’identifier des pistes concrètes d’immersion et de formation professionnelle. Nous avons mené 117 entretiens avec des personnes éloignées de l’emploi afin de mieux comprendre les bénéfices de l’outil pour ce public, et la manière dont il se différencie des autres outils de sa catégorie. L’identification des points forts de l’outil a permis de dresser une liste de bonnes pratiques pouvant optimiser les effets bénéfiques des dispositifs et outils d’aide à l’insertion professionnelle.

L’orientation professionnelle des élèves de collèges et lycées, notamment des publics à besoins éducatifs spécifiques (i.e., SEGPA, ULIS), demeure un problème récurrent en France. Nous avons évalué dans quelle mesure un outil numérique facilitant l’identification des expériences personnelles et professionnelles ayant permis le développement de compétences transversales (Diagoriente) s’avérait pertinent pour l’accompagnement à l’orientation scolaire et professionnelle d’élèves de collèges et lycées, notamment de filières spécialisées. D’après 19 entretiens auprès de professionnels de l’orientation scolaire, Diagoriente serait pertinent pour accompagner la construction du projet professionnel des élèves, y compris ceux à besoins spécifiques. La principale force de Diagoriente résiderait dans sa démarche unique d’identification des compétences via les expériences professionnelles et personnelles qui favorisent la valorisation des jeunes. Les outils numériques accessibles et polyvalents comme Diagoriente représentent une des opportunités que les professionnels scolaires peuvent saisir pour lutter contre les inégalités sociales qui, encore aujourd’hui, déterminent grandement les choix d’orientation.

Background: Despite its proven efficacy in preventing HPV-related cancers, HPV vaccine uptake remains suboptimal in France (i.e., coverage reached 54.6% for girls and 15.8% for boys in 2023). Understanding stakeholder perspectives across key dimensions related to vaccination perceptions, HPV-related representations, barriers, facilitators, and communication dynamics is essential. This study investigates the knowledge, attitudes, barriers, and facilitators related to HPV vaccination among four stakeholder groups: adolescents, parents, school staff, and pharmacists. Methods: A total of 63 semi-structured interviews were conducted with middle school students ( n = 15), parents ( n = 18), school staff ( n = 15), and pharmacists ( n = 15) in France. Thematic analysis was used to identify common and group-specific representations, emotional responses, and social dynamics influencing HPV vaccine acceptance. Results: Participants generally supported HPV vaccination as a cancer-prevention tool but highlighted barriers such as limited HPV knowledge, gender-based misconceptions, unease discussing sexuality, concerns about side effects, and logistical hurdles. Facilitators included trust in healthcare professionals, pharmacies’ accessibility, and the school’s potential as an information platform. While adolescents expressed injection anxiety and a need for age-appropriate, anonymous formats, parents emphasized clear, data-driven communication. Overall, teachers felt underprepared, and pharmacists showed willingness to engage but required better informational tools. All groups called for targeted, emotionally resonant, multi-channel communication. Conclusions: Increasing HPV vaccination requires coordinated efforts that support schools, mobilize trusted healthcare professionals, and deliver clear, stigma-free information. Practical tools and targeted training could further strengthen stakeholder engagement.