Total number born (TNB), number of stillborn (NSB), and gestation length (GL) are economically important traits in pig production, and disentangling the molecular mechanisms associated with traits can provide valuable insights into their genetic structure. Genotype imputation can be used as a practical tool to improve the marker density of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chips based on sequence data, thereby dramatically improving the power of genome-wide association studies (GWAS). In this study, we applied Beagle software to impute the 50 K chip data to the whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data with average imputation accuracy (R²) of 0.876. The target pigs, 2655 Large White pigs introduced from Canadian and French lines, were genotyped by a GeneSeek Porcine 50K chip. The 30 Large White reference pigs were the key ancestral individuals sequenced by whole-genome resequencing. To avoid population stratification, we identified genetic variants associated with reproductive traits by performing within-population GWAS and cross-population meta-analyses with data before and after imputation. Finally, several genes were detected and regarded as potential candidate genes for each of the traits: for the TNB trait: NOTCH2, KLF3, PLXDC2, NDUFV1, TLR10, CDC14A, EPC2, ORC4, ACVR2A, and GSC; for the NSB trait: NUB1, TGFBR3, ZDHHC14, FGF14, BAIAP2L1, EVI5, TAF1B, and BCAR3; for the GL trait: PPP2R2B, AMBP, MALRD1, HOXA11, and BICC1. In conclusion, expanding the size of the reference population and finding an optimal imputation strategy to ensure that more loci are obtained for GWAS under high imputation accuracy will contribute to the identification of causal mutations in pig breeding.

The number of teats is related to the nursing ability of sows. In the present study, we conducted genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for traits related to teat number in Duroc pig population. Two mixed models, one for counted and another for binary phenotypic traits, were employed to analyze seven traits: the right (RTN), left (LTN), and total (TTN) teat numbers; maximum teat number on a side (MAX); left minus right side teat number (LR); the absolute value of LR (ALR); and the presence of symmetry between left and right teat numbers (SLR). We identified 11, 1, 4, 13, and 9 significant SNPs associated with traits RTN, LTN, MAX, TTN, and SLR, respectively. One significant SNP (MARC0038565) was found to be simultaneous associated with RTN, LTN, MAX and TTN. Two annotated genes (VRTN and SYNDIG1L) were located in genomic region around this SNP. Three significant SNPs were shown to be associated with TTN, RTN and MAX traits. Seven significant SNPs were simultaneously detected in two traits of TTN and RTN. Other two SNPs were only identified in TTN. These 13 SNPs were clustered in the genomic region between 96.10—98.09 Mb on chromosome 7. Moreover, nine significant SNPs were shown to be significantly associated with SLR. In total, four and 22 SNPs surpassed genome-wide significance and suggestive significance levels, respectively. Among candidate genes annotated, eight genes have documented association with the teat number relevant traits. Out of them, DPF3 genes on Sus scrofa chromosome (SSC) 7 and the NRP1 gene on SSC 10 were new candidate genes identified in this study. Our findings demonstrate the genetic mechanism of teat number relevant traits and provide a reference to further improve reproductive performances in practical pig breeding programs.

Background: Genomic selection involves choosing as parents those elite individuals with the higher genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) to accelerate the speed of genetic improvement in domestic animals. But after multi-generation selection, the rate of inbreeding and the occurrence of homozygous harmful alleles might increase, which would reduce performance and genetic diversity. To mitigate the above problems, we can utilize genomic mating (GM) based upon optimal mate allocation to construct the best genotypic combinations in the next generation. In this study, we used stochastic simulation to investigate the impact of various factors on the efficiencies of GM to optimize pairing combinations after genomic selection of candidates in a pig population. These factors included: the algorithm used to derive inbreeding coefficients; the trait heritability (0.1, 0.3 or 0.5); the kind of GM scheme (focused average GEBV or inbreeding); the approach for computing the genomic relationship matrix (by SNP or runs of homozygosity (ROH)). The outcomes were compared to three traditional mating schemes (random, positive assortative or negative assortative matings). In addition, the performance of the GM approach was tested on real datasets obtained from a Large White pig breeding population. Results: Genomic mating outperforms other approaches in limiting the inbreeding accumulation for the same expected genetic gain. The use of ROH-based genealogical relatedness in GM achieved faster genetic gains than using relatedness based on individual SNPs. The G_ROH-based GM schemes with the maximum genetic gain resulted in 0.9%–2.6% higher rates of genetic gain ΔG, and 13%–83.3% lower ΔF than positive assortative mating regardless of heritability. The rates of inbreeding were always the fastest with positive assortative mating. Results from a purebred Large White pig population, confirmed that GM with ROH-based GRM was more efficient than traditional mating schemes. Conclusion: Compared with traditional mating schemes, genomic mating can not only achieve sustainable genetic progress but also effectively control the rates of inbreeding accumulation in the population. Our findings demonstrated that breeders should consider using genomic mating for genetic improvement of pigs.

Selection is a continuous process that can influence the distribution of target traits in a population. From the perspective of breeding, elite individuals are selected for breeding, which is called truncated selection. With the introduction and application of the best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) method, breeders began to use pedigree-based estimated breeding values (EBV) to select candidates for the genetic improvement of complex traits. Although truncated selection based on EBV can significantly improve the genetic progress, the genetic relationships between individuals with a high breeding value are usually closed, and the probability of being co-selected is greater, which will lead to a rapid increase in the level of inbreeding in the population. Reduced genetic variation is not conducive to long-term sustainable breeding, so a trade-off between genetic progress and inbreeding is required. As livestock and poultry breeding enters the genomic era, using genomic information to obtain optimal mating plans has formally been proposed by Akdemir et al., a method called genomic mating (GM). GM is more accurate and reliable than using pedigree information. Moreover, it can effectively control the inbreeding level of the population and achieve long-term and sustainable genetic gain. Hence, GM is more suitable for modern animal breeding, especially for local livestock and poultry breed conservation and genetic improvement. This review mainly summarized the principle of genomic mating, the methodology and usage of genomic mating, and the progress of its application in livestock and poultry.