Samuel J. S. Rubin

Dr. Samuel J. S. Rubin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2017 in Drug Discovery Today
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NQNir Qvit
Nir Qvit
SRSamuel J. S. Rubin
Samuel J. S. Rubin
TUTravis J. Urban
Travis J. Urban
DMDaria Mochly-Rosen
Daria Mochly-Rosen
EGEric R. Gross
Eric R. Gross


9 April 2019 in Nature Reviews Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SRSamuel J. S. Rubin
Samuel J. S. Rubin
MBMichelle S. Bloom
Michelle S. Bloom
WRWilliam H. Robinson
William H. Robinson

19 June 2019 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SRSamuel J. S. Rubin
Samuel J. S. Rubin
LBLawrence Bai
Lawrence Bai
YHYeneneh Haileselassie
Yeneneh Haileselassie
GGGotzone Garay
Gotzone Garay
CYChohee Yun
Chohee Yun
AHAida Habtezion
Aida Habtezion
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) includes Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Each disease is characterized by a diverse set of potential manifestations, which determine patients’ disease phenotype. Current understanding of phenotype determinants is limited, despite increasing prevalence and healthcare costs. Diagnosis and monitoring of disease requires invasive procedures, such as endoscopy and tissue biopsy. Here we report signatures of heterogeneity between disease diagnoses and phenotypes. Using mass cytometry, we analyze leukocyte subsets, characterize their function(s), and examine gut-homing molecule expression in blood and intestinal tissue from healthy and/or IBD subjects. Some signatures persist in IBD despite remission, and many signatures are highly represented by leukocytes that express gut trafficking molecules. Moreover, distinct systemic and local immune signatures suggest patterns of cell localization in disease. Our findings highlight the importance of gut tropic leukocytes in circulation and reveal that blood-based immune signatures differentiate clinically relevant subsets of IBD.

1 August 2021 in Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJohn Gubatan
John Gubatan
KKKian Keyashian
Kian Keyashian
SRSamuel J. S. Rubin
Samuel J. S. Rubin
JWJenny Wang
Jenny Wang
CBCyrus Buckman
Cyrus Buckman
SSSidhartha Sinha
Sidhartha Sinha
Leukocyte trafficking to the gastrointestinal tract is recognized to play a role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Integrins are expressed on immune cells and interact with cell adhesion molecules (CAM) to mediate leukocyte trafficking. Blockade of the gut-tropic integrin α 4β 7 and its subunits has been exploited as a therapeutic target in IBD. Natalizumab (anti-α 4) is approved for moderate to severe Crohn’s disease (CD), but its use is limited due to potential risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Vedolizumab (anti-α 4β 7) is approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and CD. It is the most widely used anti-integrin therapy in IBD and has been shown to be effective in both induction and maintenance therapy, with a favorable safety profile. Several models incorporating clinical, genetic, immune, gut microbial, and vitamin D markers to predict response to vedolizumab in IBD have been developed. Etrolizumab (anti-β 7) blocks leukocyte trafficking via α 4β 7 and cell adhesion via αEβ 7 integrins. Large phase 3 clinical trials evaluating efficacy of etrolizumab in the induction and maintenance of patients with IBD are underway. Other investigational anti-integrin therapies include abrilumab (anti-α 4β 7 IgG2), PN-943 (orally administered and gut-restricted α 4β 7 antagonist peptide), AJM300 (orally active small molecule inhibitor of α 4), and ontamalimab (anti-MAdCAM-1 IgG).

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSShmuel Silnitsky
Shmuel Silnitsky
SRSamuel J. S. Rubin
Samuel J. S. Rubin
MZMulate Zerihun
Mulate Zerihun
NQNir Qvit
Nir Qvit
Protein kinases are one of the most significant drug targets in the human proteome, historically harnessed for the treatment of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and a growing number of other conditions, including autoimmune and inflammatory processes. Since the approval of the first kinase inhibitors in the late 1990s and early 2000s, the field has grown exponentially, comprising 98 approved therapeutics to date, 37 of which were approved between 2016 and 2021. While many of these small-molecule protein kinase inhibitors that interact orthosterically with the protein kinase ATP binding pocket have been massively successful for oncological indications, their poor selectively for protein kinase isozymes have limited them due to toxicities in their application to other disease spaces. Thus, recent attention has turned to the use of alternative allosteric binding mechanisms and improved drug platforms such as modified peptides to design protein kinase modulators with enhanced selectivity and other pharmacological properties. Herein we review the role of different protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms in cancer and cardiovascular disease, with particular attention to PKC-family inhibitors. We discuss translational examples and carefully consider the advantages and limitations of each compound (Part I). We also discuss the recent advances in the field of protein kinase modulators, leverage molecular docking to model inhibitor–kinase interactions, and propose mechanisms of action that will aid in the design of next-generation protein kinase modulators (Part II).