Tumour-induced osteomalacia (TIO) is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome characterised by severe hypophosphataemia and osteomalacia, with renal phosphate wasting that occurs in association with tumour. The epidemiology likewise aetiology is not known. The clinical presentation of TIO includes bone fractures, bone and muscular pains, and sometimes height and weight loss. TIO may be associated with mesenchymal tumours which may be benign or malignant in rare cases. Mesenchymal tumour itself may be related to fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), which is responsible for hypophosphataemia and phosphaturia occurring in this paraneoplastic syndrome. Hypophosphataemia, phosphaturia and elevated alkaline phosphatase are the main laboratory readings that may lead to more precise investigations and better diagnosis. Finding the tumour can be a major diagnostic challenge and may involve total body magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and scintigraphy using radiolabelled somatostatin analogue. The treatment of choice for TIO is resection of a tumour with a wide margin to insure complete tumour removal, as recurrences of these tumours have been reported. We provide here an overview on the current available TIO case reports and review the best practices that may lead to earlier recognition of TIO and the subsequent treatment thereof, even though biochemical background and the long-term prognosis of the disease are not well understood. This review also includes a 4-year-long history of a patient that featured muscular pains, weakness and multiple stress fractures localised in the hips and vertebra with subsequent recovery after tumour resection. Because the occurrence of such a condition is rare, it may take years to correctly diagnose the disease, as is reported in this case report.

Most kidney transplant patients who undergo biopsies are classified as having no rejection based on consensus thresholds. However, we hypothesized that because these patients have normal adaptive immune systems, T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) may exist as subthreshold activity in some transplants currently classified as no rejection. To examine this question, we studied genome-wide microarray results from 5086 kidney transplant biopsies (4170 patients). An updated archetypal analysis designated 56% of biopsies as no rejection. Subthreshold molecular TCMR and/or ABMR activity molecular activity was detectable as elevated classifier scores in many biopsies classified as no rejection, with ABMR activity in many TCMR biopsies and TCMR activity in many ABMR biopsies. In biopsies classified as no rejection histologically and molecularly, molecular TCMR classifier scores correlated with increases in histologic TCMR features and molecular injury, lower eGFR, and higher risk of graft loss, and molecular ABMR activity correlated with increased glomerulitis and donor-specific antibody. No rejection biopsies with high subthreshold TCMR or ABMR activity had a higher probability of having TCMR or ABMR respectively diagnosed in a future biopsy. We conclude that many kidney transplant recipients have unrecognized subthreshold TCMR or ABMR activity, with significant implications for future problems.

The coronavirus (COVID‐19) pandemic is evolving very quickly and has affected healthcare systems worldwide. Many uncertainties remain about transplantation from a SARS‐CoV‐2‐positive donor as only a few cases have been reported. Here, we present the successful transplantation of 2 kidneys from a 52‐year‐old male donor with active (2 weeks of COVID‐19‐like symptoms and positive nasopharyngeal swab SARS‐CoV‐2 polymerase chain reaction on the day of organ recovery) SARS‐CoV‐2 disease. The immediate postoperative course of both recipients was uneventful. This case emphasizes that patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 may be safe organ donors.

Background: Recently proposed histopathological classification may predict patient outcome in pauci-immune glomerulonephritis. This study sought to prove that the prognostic effect could be extended to all types of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis between April 1999 and August 2015 was performed. Epidemiological and clinical data were collected from medical records. The descriptions of renal biopsies were reviewed and classified into focal, sclerotic, crescentic and mixed class according to classification proposed by Berden et al. The study end points were end stage renal disease (ESRD) or death. Survival analyses were modelled using Cox regression. Results: 73 renal biopsies with diagnosis of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis were included in the study. 25 (34.2%), 16 (21.9%), 24 (32.9%) and 8 (11%) patients were assigned to focal, crescentic, mixed and sclerotic class, respectively. Thirty-two (42.5%) patients were anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) negative, of which eight (10.9%) were anti–glomerular basement membrane antibody (anti–GBM) positive and 24 (32.8%) were negative for autoimmune antibodies. Six (8.2%) patients died within one year. Among patients who survived, median change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values were: −10.5 mL/min in focal, 4.2 mL/min in crescentic, −4.3 mL/min in mixed and 4.1 mL/min in sclerotic group, p > 0.05. In the Cox regression model, there was no significant predictor of patient survival whereas the sclerotic group (HR 3.679, 95% CI, 1.164–11.628, p < 0.05) and baseline eGFR of <15 mL/min (HR 4.832, 95% CI, 1.55–15.08, p < 0.01) had an unfavorable effect for renal survival. Conclusions: Predominant glomerular sclerosis and low eGFR at baseline are associated with higher risk of ESRD in cases with crescentic glomerulonephritis. Therefore, despite the origin of injury, histological classification might aid in prediction of patient outcomes in rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis.