P. Lakshmi Soujanya

Dr. P. Lakshmi Soujanya


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 June 2024 in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSP. Lakshmi Soujanya
P. Lakshmi Soujanya
KVK. VaniSree
K. VaniSree
GGGouri Shankar Giri
Gouri Shankar Giri
SMSushant Mahadik
Sushant Mahadik
SJShankar Lal Jat
Shankar Lal Jat
HJHanuman Jat
Hanuman Jat

11 July 2022 in Frontiers in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PSP. Lakshmi Soujanya
P. Lakshmi Soujanya
JSJ. C. Sekhar
J. C. Sekhar
KYK. R. Yathish
K. R. Yathish
CKChikkappa G. Karjagi
Chikkappa G. Karjagi
KRK. Sankara Rao
K. Sankara Rao
SRSujay Rakshit
Sujay Rakshit
Globally, maize is an important cereal food crop with the highest production and productivity. Among the biotic constraints that limit the productivity of maize, the recent invasion of fall armyworm (FAW) in India is a concern. The first line of strategy available for FAW management is to evaluate and exploit resistant genotypes for inclusion in an IPM schedule. Screening for resistant maize genotypes against FAW is in its infancy in India, considering its recent occurrence in the country. The present work attempts to optimize screening techniques suited to Indian conditions, which involve the description of leaf damage rating (LDR) by comparing injury levels among maize genotypes and to validate the result obtained from the optimized screening technique by identification of lines potentially resistant to FAW under artificial infestation. Exposure to 20 neonate FAW larvae at the V5phenological stage coupled with the adoption of LDR on a 1–9 scale aided in preliminary characterize maize genotypes as potentially resistant, moderately resistant, and susceptible. The LDR varies with genotype, neonate counts, and days after infestation. The genotypes,viz., DMRE 63, DML-163-1, CML 71, CML 141, CML 337, CML 346, and wild ancestorZea maysssp.parviglumisrecorded lower LDR ratings against FAW and can be exploited for resistance breeding in maize.

4 January 2016 in Journal of Food Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PSP. Lakshmi Soujanya
P. Lakshmi Soujanya
JSJ. C. Sekhar
J. C. Sekhar
PKP. Kumar
P. Kumar
NSN. Sunil
N. Sunil
CPCh. Vara Prasad
Ch. Vara Prasad
UMU. V. Mallavadhani
U. V. Mallavadhani

24 July 2023 in Frontiers in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PSP. Lakshmi Soujanya
P. Lakshmi Soujanya
JSJ. C. Sekhar
J. C. Sekhar
CKChikkappa G. Karjagi
Chikkappa G. Karjagi
CRC. V. Ratnavathi
C. V. Ratnavathi
RVR. Venkateswarlu
R. Venkateswarlu
SRSujay Rakshit
Sujay Rakshit
Host Plant Resistance (HPR) is the most important component for sustainable management of insect pests. The purpose of the present work was to understand the role of various morphological and biochemical factors as defense mechanism and their interaction on different biological parameters attributed to survival and development of pink stem borer (PSB), Sesamia inferens Walker in maize. The resistant and moderately resistant genotypes (DMRE 63, CM 500 and WNZ Exotic pool) suffered least leaf injury rating (LIR), dead hearts (DH%), percentage stem tunneling (ST%), number of entry/exit holes (E/EH) and showed deleterious effects on biological parameters of pink stem borer as compared to susceptible ones (CM 202 and BML 6). Resistance index among the genotypes varied from 0.11 to 0.46. The variation in morphological traits such as number of nodes, internode distance and stem diameter could not distinguish all the resistant genotypes from that of susceptible genotypes in terms of its mean value. Higher levels of biochemical constituents, viz., p-Coumaric acid (p-CA), ferulic acid (FA), acid detergent fibre (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) were observed in resistant genotypes compared to susceptible ones. Antibiosis was expressed in terms of reduced pupal weight when fed on WNZ Exotic pool, whereas larval weight and larval survival affected when fed on DMRE 63. Higher concentration of p-CA content in pith of resistant maize genotypes prolonged the pupal period of pink stem borer. Higher concentration of p-CA and FA contents in rind reduced the adult emergence, as they showed significant negative correlation between them. The larval period was prolonged with higher levels of ADF and ADL contents in maize genotypes either in rind or both rind and pith as both ADF and ADL content showed a significant positive correlation with the larval period. The Pearson correlation analysis of most of the biochemical constituents revealed significant negative correlation with damage parameters. The correlation coefficients between p-CA with DH (%), ST (%) and E/EH were r= -0.9642**, r= -0.9363**, and r= -0.9646**, respectively. Similarly, the correlation coefficients between FA with DH (%), ST (%) and E/EH were r= -0.9217*, r= -0.9563**, and r= -0.9434**, respectively and ADF with DH (%), ST (%) and E/EH were r= -0.9506**, r= -0.9611**, and r= -0.9709**, respectively. The study confirms that stem damage parameters can also be used as selection criteria along with LIR to identify resistant genotypes against pink stem borer. Based on the correlation analysis it was concluded that resistance to pink stem borer in maize is the result of interaction of several morphological and biochemical traits rather than a single factor. The findings obtained from the present study can be utilised in pink stem borer resistance breeding programmes to enhance and diversify the basis of resistance.

26 November 2024 in Phytoparasitica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PSP. Lakshmi Soujanya
P. Lakshmi Soujanya
JSJ. C. Sekhar
J. C. Sekhar
KYK. R. Yathish
K. R. Yathish
CKChikkappa G Karjagi
Chikkappa G Karjagi
KRK. Sankara Rao
K. Sankara Rao
SRSujay Rakshit
Sujay Rakshit

11 April 2024 in Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GAGadde Anilkumar
Gadde Anilkumar
PSP. Lakshmi Soujanya
P. Lakshmi Soujanya
DKD. V. Sai Ram Kumar
D. V. Sai Ram Kumar
VKV. Manoj Kumar
V. Manoj Kumar
KYK. R. Yathish
K. R. Yathish
HJH. S. Jat
H. S. Jat